Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Hmm, I've more broken ports on my system.. Like a trouble with net/samba-devel (because of PAM headers) and I can't compile lang/librep since KSE III. Are you still having problems with this. If you could show me some errors I may be able to relay them to the samba developers for you unless

Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread Marc Recht
On Sa, 2002-10-19 at 22:36, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: Hmm, I've more broken ports on my system.. Like a trouble with net/samba-devel (because of PAM headers) and I can't compile lang/librep since KSE III. Are you still having problems with this. If you could show me some errors I may

X problem,Undefined symbol __sF

2002-10-19 Thread suken woo
after rebuild everything today. get the errro messages,when running nautilus etc what can i do? Regards /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9: Undefined symbol __sF To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

open-motif compilation problem

2002-10-19 Thread walt
While compiling the open-motif port on -CURRENT I see this error during the 'configure' phase. Anyone else seeing this? checking for vprintf... yes checking whether sprintf returns void... Bus error (core dumped) yes checking for wcslen... yes ===

Re: X problem,Undefined symbol __sF

2002-10-19 Thread Julian Elischer
Unfortunaly you need to replace almost all X11 stuff.. I wish whoever broke this would fix it. So much for compatibility. On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, suken woo wrote: after rebuild everything today. get the errro messages,when running nautilus etc what can i do? Regards /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:

Re: X problem,Undefined symbol __sF

2002-10-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:02:21AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Unfortunaly you need to replace almost all X11 stuff.. Not quite. You can easily identify problematic packages by doing something like: $ for f in `find /usr/X11R6/ -type f`; do nm $f 2/dev/null | grep -qw U __sF echo $f; done $

ISO C99

2002-10-19 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi folks, I saw many warning messages when compiling sth. under -current (as expected) while I turned on the -DNO_WERROR in /etc/make.conf as told in UPDATING. But the warnings are always the same: ISO C89 doesn't support %s, so I thought about turning on the -std=c99 switch. But the kernel

Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 23:00, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I

Re: cdrtools doesn't build on -current

2002-10-19 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Long, Scott wrote: All I'm asking is that ports maintainers make an effort to maintain their ports. Will's accertation that it's an all or nothing issue is certainly not productive, and neither is the 'us versus them' inuendo here. The single one -CURRENT vs. -STABLE difference that causes

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

`nroff -mandoc foo.X | less' is broken

2002-10-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've noticed that after upgrading my -current box (15 Oct snapshot) the `nroff -mandoc foo.X | less' construction no longer does produce valid results. I'm seeing ESC[ all over the place, i.e.: ESC[1mNAMEESC[0m ESC[1mradioctl ESC[22m- control radio tuners ESC[1mSYNOPSISESC[0m

Re: [Ugly PATCH] Again: panic kmem_malloc()

2002-10-19 Thread Ben Stuyts
At 04:15 19/10/2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Jake Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021018 18:26] wrote: semop() leaks memory. An important free() was removed by alfred in rev 1.55. Try this. Oh' c'mon, isn't MP-safeness a bit more important than a some little memory leak, ram is cheap!

Re: [Ugly PATCH] Again: panic kmem_malloc(): SOLVED

2002-10-19 Thread Ben Stuyts
At 13:34 19/10/2002, Ben Stuyts wrote: At 04:15 19/10/2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Jake Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021018 18:26] wrote: semop() leaks memory. An important free() was removed by alfred in rev 1.55. Try this. Seriously, I just checked in slightly different fix (based on

Re: X problem,Undefined symbol __sF

2002-10-19 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:07:19AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:02:21AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Unfortunaly you need to replace almost all X11 stuff.. Not quite. You can easily identify problematic packages by doing something like: $ for f in `find

Continuing saga of the VAIO R505ES - now panic in GEOM

2002-10-19 Thread Pete Carah
Well, now the bad free (actually appeared to me to be a bad malloc or a bad call to malloc) is fixed; now I get a panic from GEOM (actually from witness). There are 3 or 4 geom debug messages and then a panic indicating Giant not owned. I'll follow up with an actual trace from a serial

Re: `nroff -mandoc foo.X | less' is broken

2002-10-19 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:11:34PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Hi, I've noticed that after upgrading my -current box (15 Oct snapshot) the `nroff -mandoc foo.X | less' construction no longer does produce valid results. I'm seeing ESC[ all over the place, i.e.: FreeBSD

Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread Marc Recht
A new set of 5.0 packages has been uploaded and is making its way out to mirror sites. I will soon be sending out mail to all maintainers of broken ports asking for submissions of fixes (or at least reporting the breakage to the relevant vendors). Hmm, I've more broken ports on my system..

Re: [Ugly PATCH] Again: panic kmem_malloc(): SOLVED

2002-10-19 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Ben Stuyts [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021019 07:16] wrote: At 13:34 19/10/2002, Ben Stuyts wrote: At 04:15 19/10/2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Jake Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021018 18:26] wrote: semop() leaks memory. An important free() was removed by alfred in rev 1.55. Try this.

Re: X problem,Undefined symbol __sF

2002-10-19 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:02:21AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Unfortunaly you need to replace almost all X11 stuff.. Not quite. You can easily identify problematic packages by doing something like: $ for f in `find /usr/X11R6/ -type f`; do

Re: Continuing saga of the VAIO R505ES - now panic in GEOM

2002-10-19 Thread Pete Carah
Following up on my own message: Well, now the bad free (actually appeared to me to be a bad malloc or a bad call to malloc) is fixed; now I get a panic from GEOM (actually from witness). There are 3 or 4 geom debug messages and then a panic indicating Giant not owned. I'll follow up with

Re: Continuing saga of the VAIO R505ES - now panic in GEOM

2002-10-19 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pete Carah writes: mbr_taste(MBR,geom.ctl) panic: mutex Giant not owned at /current/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:384 Debugger(panic) Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 db tr Debugger(c035289f,c03c1880,c0351bb8,d7196bd8,1) at Debugger+0x54

Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-19 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-19 ] [ Subjecte: Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE? ] From the reports: Both stable and current users get the self-healing hang, where the X server responds to nothing but the mouse moves, and at some minutes later time it continues

Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 08:19:18AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: At some point before 5.0-RELEASE I will go through and mark all ports listed on bento as BROKEN (consider this fair warning: I will not entertain any complaints from port maintainers who take offense on the basis of ignorance

Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-19 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize of a sizable gtk frame I did while it was frozen took affect when it unfroze... Have you tried loggign

Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-19 Thread Marc Recht
Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize But, it's not always so. For me most of the time everything stops. Including playing mp3s/oggs, resizing windows and so on. And after some time

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 11:13, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Every so often, my X server locks up. It seems to be in a tight loop, 95% user time, and making only these ktrace'able calls: 27069 XFree86 0.019988 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 27069 XFree86 0.39 CALL

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread Clement Laforet
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:58:48 -0700 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, my statement wasn't clear. I'll be doing something of the form .if ${OSVERSION} 50 BROKEN= Does not compile on FreeBSD 5.x .endif This will not affect users of 4.x Is there a correct way to

Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded

2002-10-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:57:37PM +0200, Clement Laforet wrote: On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:58:48 -0700 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, my statement wasn't clear. I'll be doing something of the form .if ${OSVERSION} 50 BROKEN= Does not compile on FreeBSD 5.x

Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-19 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-19 ] [ Subjecte: Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE? ] Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize But, it's not always so. For me