ACPI Errors - IBM Thinkpad A31p

2002-11-24 Thread Sid Carter
Hi Folks, I see this error while booting into BSD and I presume this might be the problem that acpi on my TP does not work. The errors are something like this. acpi0: IBMTP-1Gon motherboard Using $PIR table, 14 entries at 0xc00fdeb0

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-24 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users are paying 20 bytes/pkt for a feature they will never

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sun Nov 24 01:00:03 PST 2002 ... U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware/alpha/proc-alpha.sgml ? sys/alpha/conf/LINT U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c U sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c U sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbbreg.h U sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c

Re: installworld and stale {include,lib} fun

2002-11-24 Thread Mark Murray
I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this just paranoia inspired?

kde crashes in _thread_kern_scheduler () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5

2002-11-24 Thread Mark Hannon
Hi, Fairly new current system. Brand new KDE built from ports. Crashes immediately I press the k start button. Kcrash reports: 0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 #0 0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 #1 0x28ee1221 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from

Re: gcc 3.2.1 release import?

2002-11-24 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:06:52PM -0800, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But who will bell the cat? I vote for Snuffles. Don't understand. Some inside joke or something based on US centric TV? What are you trying to tell me? Remember I'm not native. 1930's/1940's cartoon

Polled mode with device.hints

2002-11-24 Thread Marc Fonvieille
Hello, I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode. I did a search and tried some syntax like 0 for the irq etc. but no way to put something in polled mode or to find an info on it. It's a lack of

ACPI error messages

2002-11-24 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hackers, on yesterday's -current i see ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR ACPI-1354: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR this is IBM ThinkPad 390x laptop. dmesg and acpidump are attached. any ideas? thanks max Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD

Problems with FreeBSD 5.0-DP2

2002-11-24 Thread Stefan Cars
Hi! I don't get very far when trying FreeBSD 5.0-DP2. Everything starts up OK but when trying to write down my partition information the box freezes... After awhile it reboots. The box is a Dual AMD 1400+ MP, with 512 DDR RAM, IDE 40 GB (IBM). Tyan Tiger mothboard and a Intel 107100 NIC (fxp).

UFS2 and disklabel fstype

2002-11-24 Thread Jan Srzednicki
Hello there, As UFS2 is not backward compatible at all, I wonder why the old fstype in disklabel is being kept: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 102400004.2BSD 2048 16384 64008 # (Cyl.0 - 63*) c: 186103260unused0 0

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sun Nov 24 13:00:02 PST 2002 ? sys/alpha/conf/LINT U sys/boot/efi/loader/main.c U sys/conf/options.ia64 U sys/ia64/ia64/machdep.c U sys/ia64/ia64/mca.c U sys/ia64/include/cpu.h cvs [update aborted]: cannot make directory include: File exists To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-24 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Julian Elischer writes: On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users are paying 20

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-24 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which stems from the mbuf system eventually calling kmem_malloc(). This effectively prevents any network driver

sshd and lastlog permissions

2002-11-24 Thread John Von Essen
Maybe I am missing something, but... On my -CURRENT box (current as of last night). After a fresh install (no tinkering with settings), when I use ssh to connect from a remote host, I get the following error: sshd[pid]: /var/log/lastlog: Permission denied Also, the following processes are

OpenOffice and FreeBSD 5.0-Current

2002-11-24 Thread a
Hi I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET) I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with pkg_add. Ok, that one went fine. But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault, and

Re: OpenOffice and FreeBSD 5.0-Current

2002-11-24 Thread Jens Rehsack
a wrote: Hi I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET) I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with pkg_add. Ok, that one went fine. But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault,

Re: OpenOffice and FreeBSD 5.0-Current

2002-11-24 Thread Yann Berthier
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote: Hi I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET) I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with pkg_add. Ok, that one went fine. But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I

subscribe

2002-11-24 Thread cyranodebergerac
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

using 5.0-RELEASE

2002-11-24 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi, just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the early adopters guide (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as stable as possible to getting a large number of users to test. But if it's not recommented to use it in production environments, what test results do

Re: sshd and lastlog permissions

2002-11-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:09:19PM -0500, John Von Essen wrote: Like I said, this is a fresh install with no config changes. Any ideas as to what is going on? This is a known problem. Kris msg47387/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-24 Thread Philip Paeps
Hi guys - I accidently upgraded my workstation to -CURRENT over the weekend (forgot a tag=RELENG_4 in my supfile and let it cook). It being a workstation and containing no critical data, I decided to just stick with it and give it a go. The machine's been running for a day and a bit now, and

Re: Objective-C threads

2002-11-24 Thread Terry Lambert
Chad David wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: Perhaps because maintaining them in the FreeBSD repo might be the wrong place. To answer your other questiion -- because a change to fix one thing for one person might break things for 10 others. Which

Re: buildworld fails on x86

2002-11-24 Thread Dan Lukes
On Friday 22 November 2002 09.03, David Holm wrote: Hi, I've tried to build world since yesterday, doing cvsup's inbetween hopi= ng for a fix. But it always fails on bin/cat with a bunch of unresolvable pthread symbols at linking. I have cleared out my old /usr/obj. cat cat.o

Re: OpenOffice and FreeBSD 5.0-Current

2002-11-24 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2002-11-24 23:33 +, Yann Berthier wrote: On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote: Hi I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET) I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with pkg_add. Ok, that one went fine.

reproducable panic with todays current. and xl0 NIC

2002-11-24 Thread Tilman Linneweh
Hi, I can reproducable panic todays CURRENT by running ifconfig xl0 up (My rl0 NIC works fine). The xl0 NIC works on STABLE. Any help/ideas appreciated. regards tilman polly# ifconfig xl0 up panic: invalid ife-ifm_data (0x6000) in mii_phy_setmedia Debugger(panic) Stopped at

Re: Objective-C threads

2002-11-24 Thread Chad David
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:06:05PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Chad David wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: Perhaps because maintaining them in the FreeBSD repo might be the wrong place. To answer your other questiion -- because a change to fix one

about GEOM 'geoms' chain question

2002-11-24 Thread kai ouyang
Hi, Poul-Henning This is my DP2 box's info about 'GEOM' when power on with 'boot -v'. GEOM: new disk da0 GEOM: new disk da1 GEOM: new disk da2 MBR Slice 1 on da0: 80 01 01 00 a5 fe ff 7b 3f 00 00 00 3d a8 da 00 |...{?...=...| [0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):123/254/255 s:63

Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-24 Thread Kirk McKusick
On Tuesday Nov 26th I plan to make an update to the UFS2 superblock. It will not affect UFS1 filesystems so should be generally transparent to most -current users. For those using UFS2 filesystems, the new kernel will update the superblock to the new format the first time that your UFS2 filesystem

Re: Objective-C threads

2002-11-24 Thread Terry Lambert
[ ... Objective C ... ] Chad David wrote: And I thought this thread was dead :). It just showed up in the inbox last night; it must have been stuck in your mail server. Sorry about that. I don't really feel a need to convince. If people are too busy (or just do not care) to maintain ObjC

Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-24 Thread Julian Elischer
I do have one question re: UFS2, not specifically about this change however.. I notice that the fields of the disk structure are signed. Wouldn;t it make more sence at this early stage to declare them as unsigned? For example take this snippet from struct fs int64_t fs_size;

Re: buildworld fails on x86

2002-11-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Dan Lukes wrote: The problem you hit is that the pthread stub functions as declared within src/lib/libc/gen/_pthread_stubs.c are optimized-out by -O3 causing undefined symbol errors later during build. I don't know if it is gcc's optimiser bug or there is something

Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-24 Thread Kirk McKusick
Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not (for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just going through and making everything unsigned is not the right approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing some of these fields once the tree opens back up,

Re: Polled mode with device.hints

2002-11-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Marc Fonvieille wrote: Hello, I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode. I did a search and tried some syntax like 0 for the irq etc. but no way to put something in polled mode or

Re: [Where] is OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package available?

2002-11-24 Thread Noriyoshi Kawano
Hi, you can find it on http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/. At Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:09:09 + (GMT), Daniel Flickinger wrote: package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on OpenOffice.org... where does it reside? I would

Re: [Where] is OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package available?

2002-11-24 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2002-11-25 06:09 +, Daniel Flickinger wrote: package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on OpenOffice.org... where does it reside? http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ I would compile it, but I would need to reorganize

Re: [Where] is OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package available?

2002-11-24 Thread a
Hi. Daniel Flickinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 25.11.2002, 07:09:09: package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on OpenOffice.org... where does it reside? http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ But, i tried to install that package

Re: [Where] is OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package available?

2002-11-24 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2002-11-25 08:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ But, i tried to install that package on my FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT, well it went fine, but when i try to run openoffice, i will get a Segmentation fault. Hope you will have more luck. As it says in the