RE: ARLA 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1

2002-12-17 Thread Petr Holub
Now that I'm having much better luck with -current, I haven't had the time to go back and look into arla. Also, since that time there has been a fair amount of progress with openafs support for freebsd, and for my own purposes that would be an easier sell to my managers anyway. [not that I

sshd only allows connections per public key since this week

2002-12-17 Thread Fritz Heinrichmeyer
this is almost the complete report, i get the on this list already mentioned error message fatal: ssh_msg_send: write when i try to use password (pam?) authentication to my current box (same effect from anywhere). As the title says, public_key authentication works. This effect started to show

Re: ARLA 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1

2002-12-17 Thread Andrea Campi
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:34:35PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: When I was looking into this, I was talking with Andrea Campi about some changes he had for arla on -current. He was also very busy at the time, but maybe he still has that around. (I'm in the middle I used to have patches

How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
Have an existing partition with UFS1 on it. How can i update/convert it to UFS2? It is safe make it that way: dump -0 -f /store/arch.usr /usr shutdown now umount -a /usr mount / mount /store newfs -O2 /dev/ad0s2e restore -f /store/arch.usr /store is fat32 partition.

Re: ARLA 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1

2002-12-17 Thread Love
Andrea Campi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:34:35PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: When I was looking into this, I was talking with Andrea Campi about some changes he had for arla on -current. He was also very busy at the time, but maybe he still has that around. (I'm

Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked

2002-12-17 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I've updated today's -current (HEAD). I got this messages after rebooting. Is it OK? Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @ ../../../geom/geom_mbr.c:118 Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @ ../../../geom/geom_slice.c:298 Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @

Re: Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked

2002-12-17 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes: I've updated today's -current (HEAD). I got this messages after rebooting. Is it OK? No, it's not, but your system is almost certainly unharmed. Fixed a second a go. Thanks! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL

Re: 5.0 performance (was: 80386 out of GENERIC)

2002-12-17 Thread Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer
When I put KDE 3.0.5 on my 5.0-RC1 box it took just about 20 hours (600mhz with 384MB PC100... backup box ;)) but it runs faster (as compared to KDE on a 4.7-RELEASE). Im willing to give up a bit more comiple time to get better performance out of my apps. =) -Nick Harm Hale - Original

Re: How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Ray Kohler
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Vitaly Markitantov wrote: Have an existing partition with UFS1 on it. How can i update/convert it to UFS2? It is safe make it that way: dump -0 -f /store/arch.usr /usr shutdown now umount -a /usr mount / mount /store newfs

ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
The current ata driver on pc98 has a problem. I think that the following patch solves the problem. Please review it. This change must be in RELENG_5_0 branch. Index: sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c === RCS file:

sio and ed woes

2002-12-17 Thread ianf
Hi I have a problem getting CURRENT to find my ISA SMC Ultra ethernet card. No matter what I do I can't stop the kernel finding a third sio device on top of the memory and interrupt that the ed card occupies. The kernel correctly registers its surprise at finding the third sio device since no

5.0 upgrade via dump/restore how-to?

2002-12-17 Thread Lucky Green
A few folks have asked me if I knew if there is an how-to that could be used as a basis for upgrading a STABLE box to 5.0 using not the procedures in UPGRADING, but rather performing a clean 5.0 install on a fresh disk followed by restoring whatever is required to make the new install look like

Re: ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread phk
I really wish somebody could tell us conclusively when to use the compat geometry and when not ? Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ? Does it depend on the size of the disks ? Does it also affect SCSI disks ? Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: The current ata

Re: ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ? Does it depend on the size of the disks ? Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is 8 heads and 17 sectors. If the size of the disk is larger

Re: ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ? Does it depend on the size of the disks ? Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is

Re: ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ? Does it depend on the size of the disks ? Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is 8 heads and 17

Re: ata driver

2002-12-17 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess the correct pseudocode then is: if (disk is ata unit 4 size 65535C x 8H x 17S x 512B) { use 8/17 geometry } Is this correctly understood ? So this would not affect an IDE

Re: 5.0 performance (was: 80386 out of GENERIC)

2002-12-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-12-16 23:24, Gary Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 03:45 AM 12/17/2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: I still have the Pentium 133 with 64 MB or memory that I used to run 5.0-CURRENT until a few weeks ago. I haven't got any real numbers, but the general `feel' of the system was

Re: How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Steven Ames
On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs. -Steve - Original Message - From: Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Vitaly Markitantov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:54 AM

Re: How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote: On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs. -Steve Maybe dumpfs(8) will help you. -- Aurelien msg48915/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

C64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Dillon
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Amiga 500 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Dillon
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

pdp11 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Dillon
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: pdp11 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Harti Brandt
Great I was waiting for this for too long. I'm going to install this on my 11/70 emulator as soon as it compiles again :-) How about a HP-65 port? harti On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Dillon wrote: MD MD-- MD Rebuilding the temporary

VAX tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Dillon
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Dillon
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal with other people. I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants it, for that matter. Thank you,

Re: VAX tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Vallo Kallaste
This is cross-compiled, isn't it? Or you guys have too much patience otherwise. On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0800, Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree

Kernel Panic in runq_check

2002-12-17 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
I have a CURRENT system that is panicing on me every couple of days. I have enabled crash dumps in the rc.conf file, but when the system is rebooted, savecore doesn't find any core files on the swap partition. The system has 128M RAM installed, and the swap partion is ~512M. I am using a

Re: ipfw userland breaks again.

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
Huh. Interesting. The IP_FW_ADD test threw me but now that I look at the code more closely it is only there because IP_FW_ADD is a valid SOPT_GET op as well as a SOPT_SET op. But FLUSH and friends are SOPT_SET only. Now I see how it works :-)

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Emiel Kollof
* Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal with other people. Damn, isn't it a little early for april fool? Cheers, Emiel

50% off All Lists: Publicity - Libraries - Bookstores - Film Producers - Art Galleries - Record Stores - Custom (more)

2002-12-17 Thread [ToolsForMarketing]
***LIMITED TIME SALE - ALL LISTS 50% OFF MUST MENTION SALE WHEN ORDERING*** -- UNLIMITED USE LISTS . . .DOWNLOAD WITHIN MINUTES. -- NEW LISTS: TRAVEL MEDIA, SCIENCE PROFESSORS,

Re: ipfw userland breaks again.

2002-12-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:23:15AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Huh. Interesting. The IP_FW_ADD test threw me but now that I look at the code more closely it is only there because IP_FW_ADD is a valid SOPT_GET op as well as a SOPT_SET op. But FLUSH and friends are SOPT_SET

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Jens Rehsack
Emiel Kollof wrote: * Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal with other people. Damn, isn't it a little early for april

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Frank Mayhar
Emiel Kollof wrote: Someone claiming to be Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal with other people. Damn, isn't it a

Re: SCSI Bios complaints and Disk Slices

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote: Windows .. fine, I installed Linux .. fine. Then I installed FreeBSD...fine *but* the SCSI BIOS on bootup complains that the disk geometry is all cockeyed, and it looks that way from what it says. It warns any non-DOS O/S may have problems using it.

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Matt Dillon wrote: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal with other people. I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants it, for that

INTR_MPSAFE to network device drivers

2002-12-17 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
Is it okay to add INTR_MPSAFE for all INTR_TYPE_NET drivers? mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock. Or is there any unresolved related issues? -- Kyunghwan Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: writing to mbr under GEOM

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Ray Kohler wrote: What's the status of the issue where devices with open partitions can't have their boot sectors written to? I know phk@ was working on it a while back but it's something I'd like to see fixed soon, maybe before release? I've been using the following:

perl from with XF4 port

2002-12-17 Thread Long, Scott
I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package. Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that /usr/X11R6/bin/mkhtmlindex could not be found. Sure enough the file was

Re: INTR_MPSAFE to network device drivers

2002-12-17 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kyunghwan Kim writes: Is it okay to add INTR_MPSAFE for all INTR_TYPE_NET drivers? NO! mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock. Or is there any unresolved related issues? Yes, the mbuf allocator must

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :Matt Dillon wrote: : Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and : flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share : my views on how to deal with other people. : : I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants :

RE: perl from with XF4 port

2002-12-17 Thread John Baldwin
On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote: I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package. Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that /usr/X11R6/bin/mkhtmlindex could not

Re: perl from with XF4 port

2002-12-17 Thread Scott Long
John Baldwin wrote: On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote: I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package. Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that

Re: INTR_MPSAFE to network device drivers

2002-12-17 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock. Or is there any unresolved related issues? Yes, the mbuf allocator must occasionally call kmem_malloc(),

Re: Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: It appears that you are getting all those errors (BAD block) because fsck thinks that your filesystem is smaller than it really is. If you do a dumpfs on the filesystem and check the size (about line 5), I expect that you will find that all those bad

Re: perl from with XF4 port

2002-12-17 Thread John Baldwin
On 17-Dec-2002 Scott Long wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote: I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package. Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it

Re: INTR_MPSAFE to network device drivers

2002-12-17 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:00AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock. Or is there any unresolved related

Re: Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-17 Thread Kirk McKusick
Please send me a `dumpfs /usr | head -50' output of the filesystem under the current system. Then clean it up with fsck and run the same command again. Finally, boot up under the old kernel and get the output both before and after fsck cleaning. What I am looking for is changes in the reported

tunefs bug?

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
tunefs(8) appears to do a mount/MNT_RELOAD of an fs even when it doesn't perform any action. To reproduce: mount -r /usr tunefs -n enable /usr [repeat] Is this a bug? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread David Nicholas Kayal
This type of thing caused the division of the BSD projects in the first place, and hurts the project over all and is the primary reason that Linux has such a better market position then BSD. I love FreeBSD. I dunno why. I just do. I'm no expert, but it sits right with me. It is a shame that

subscribe

2002-12-17 Thread redjupiter
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: INTR_MPSAFE to network device drivers

2002-12-17 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kyunghwan Kim writes: On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:00AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock. Or is

Re: How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Ray Kohler
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote: On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs. dumpfs filesystem | grep UFS -- Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] See - the thing is - I'm an absolutist. I mean, kind

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
:You know the person by name/alias, then? Who is it? : I do not know who it is, he posts through anonymous proxies. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

5.0-RC1 /etc/rc.d/ipfw script and NAT

2002-12-17 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Hi, There's trouble in the /etc/rc.d/ipfw script in how it changes things versus the 4.7 /etc/rc.network script when it comes to NAT in certain configurations. For example, on my home gateway box, rc.conf contains: # Network address translation: natd_enable=YES natd_interface=

sshd and PRNG in FreeBSD 5.0 RC1

2002-12-17 Thread redjupiter
Hi All, I installed FreeBSD 5.0 RC1 and everything seems to be working just fine. I recompiled the kernel with extra hardware including IPSEC , netgraph, ipfilter and ipfw support. Againseem sto be working just fine and find and configured my hardware. However, SSHD started complaining about

Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-17 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:42:07 -0600 From: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block In the last episode (Dec 16), Aurelien Nephtali said: Hi, I got a panic today which occured

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Port package on RC1

2002-12-17 Thread Ryan Sommers
Today for the fun of it I decided to try installing RC1 on VMware running in Win2K. (very bored today). Everything goes fine until the ports installation. I choose all the default options, I have it running in a 256mb of RAM 10gb virtual disk environment. Like I said up until the ports

Mounting MS-DOS fs image via /dev/md*

2002-12-17 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I'm not sure this is correct way to create MS-DOS fs image and mounting it. % dd if=/dev/zero of=test.flp bs=1024 count=1440 1440+0 records in 1440+0 records out 1474560 bytes transferred in 0.044105 secs (33432904 bytes/sec) % sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -f test.flp md1 % sudo newfs_msdos -f 1440

Port package on RC1

2002-12-17 Thread Garrett Wollman
On 17 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0600, Ryan Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm wondering what it's doing because it isn't copying over ports very fast. It's slow because it's creating lots of very small directories. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: : :Matt Dillon wrote: : Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and : flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share : my views on how to deal with other people. : : I hereby give

Kernel hangs during boot (new GEOM problem)

2002-12-17 Thread walt
I built world+kernel about an hour ago ( Dec 17 about 23:00 UTC) and the kernel hangs in the middle of printing phk's GEOM diagnostics: ad0: 76319MB ST380021A [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad2: 42934MB WDC WD450AA-00BAA0 [87233/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66 acd0: CD-RW R/RW 4x4x24 at

You need E-MAiL AddREssES, we've got em: 40OM for $139

2002-12-17 Thread Michael D G McKinlay
You want email addresses; we've got lots of fresh ones. Face it, there's no way you're going to extract 400 million email addresses with some flimsy email extractor program you downloaded from the web. You're lucky if you can extract 2 million in a year! Our email addresses are even targeted in

Re: Posix Semaphores in -CURRENT

2002-12-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Joe Kelsey wrote: OK, this is a bug. The semantics don't conform to POSIX. ... I rather imagine the correct thing to do is to root it in the FS, and, without a leading '/', treat it as relative to the process current directory. Basically, this is not a two line fix... it's a lot of

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Terry Lambert
John Baldwin wrote: This has nothing to do with /dev/random. Please stop with the constant FUDing Terry. | Revision 1.296 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Jan 14 | 10:11:10 2001 UTC (23 months ago) by jhb | Branch: MAIN | Changes since 1.295: +2 -2 lines | Diff to previous

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Chris Doherty wrote: p.s. I somehow suspect that embedded systems vendors aren't installing from the CDROM. why is this an issue? 1) supporting every computer made since 1964 is NetBSD's job, not FreeBSD's. 2) I'm scared that 5.0 is going to be unpleasantly slow on my p2-366, let

Installing 5.0-RC1 on Sony Vaio z505s with Linksys Combo Card ...

2002-12-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Is there anyway of doing this? the boot disk is recognizing the card, but is followed by: device_probe_and_attach: ed1 attach returned 6 My first guess is that its conflicting with the existing fxp0 device that was detected before it, since its sharing the IRQ, but dont' know how to debug

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-17 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC ] Apparently, one of the primary markets for FreeBSD is embedded devices. Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and removing lots of things in the kernel, to make

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread David Cuthbert
Juli Mallett wrote: Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and removing lots of things in the kernel, to make things fit, and to make things do their jobs, can't be bothered to use the appropriate CPU settings? Not sure where you got that from Terry's post, but... As a

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: David Cuthbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-17 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC ] Juli Mallett wrote: Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and removing lots of things in the kernel, to make things fit, and to make things do their jobs,

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:05:40AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I suppose it would be a good idea to include an alternatvie i386 kernel on the CD-ROM. There may be a space issue, of course. How many people participating in this thread have

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-17 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: sio and ed woes

2002-12-17 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem getting CURRENT to find my ISA SMC Ultra ethernet card. No matter what I do I can't stop the kernel finding a third sio device on top of the memory and interrupt that the ed card occupies. The kernel correctly registers its

Re: unrar doesn't work under current

2002-12-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 06:44:56PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: Think it has something to do with this one: 46353 unrarCALL open(0xbfbf98e3,0,0xbef6d8) 46353 unrarNAMI ../rar/sample.rar 46353 unrarRET open 3 46353 unrarCALL flock(0x3,0x6) 46353 unrarNAMI

Re: I'm leaving the project

2002-12-17 Thread Leif Neland
: :Does anyone know why this person is trying to (poorly) impersonate MD? Probably because I lambast him mercilessly for being such a whimp. It's kinda sad, actually. He's probably not making any friends with the people running the blind proxies he abuses to post, either.

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-17 Thread Leif Neland
But still, would it be impossible to have both a GENERIC and a GENERIC386 kernel in the distribution? Or is the whole system compiled in non-386 mode? Even so, if just one site. www.386.freebsd.org were having a 386-enabled version available, wouldn't that make everybody happy? Leif To

Re: unrar doesn't work under current

2002-12-17 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 18-Dec-2002 (06:52:54/GMT) Kris Kennaway wrote: This is due to lack of rpc.lockd running on the nfs client and/or server. Yes, I tryed on a nfs mounted dir from my -CURRENT home machine. This means that this is a pilot error? Again? :-( I'm sorry. I think that I must sleep a little

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-17 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:19:13 -0800 From: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking

Re: unrar doesn't work under current

2002-12-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:20:21AM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote: On 18-Dec-2002 (06:52:54/GMT) Kris Kennaway wrote: This is due to lack of rpc.lockd running on the nfs client and/or server. Yes, I tryed on a nfs mounted dir from my -CURRENT home machine. This means that this is a pilot

Re: 5.0-RC1: suspend trouble

2002-12-17 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Christian Brueffer wrote: Suspend works ok on my Thinkpad R32. Which version do you have? A21e To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message