Re: fxp0 device timeout on 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Am Do, 2003-01-30 um 12.41 schrieb Sergey A. Osokin: 3) Put hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1 into your /boot/loader.conf.local Thanks, that did the trick. Could we, maybe, add a little note about this to the release notes or errata? Or better yet, how about a big fat warning message if

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:35:40PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 9:18 PM +0200 1/29/03, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Can anyone think of a good way to implement an installworld / installkernel seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current? What I'm looking for is a way for installworld

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:33:16PM -0500, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:05:06 -0800 David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a great answer...to a different question. ;-) Use the r version of the cvs commands (like cvs rlog and rdiff). They operate on the

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:58:15PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Christopher Vance [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:07:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: : On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:05:06PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: : Thus spake Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : On

Re: fxp0 device timeout on 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:32:07AM +0100, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: Am Do, 2003-01-30 um 12.41 schrieb Sergey A. Osokin: 3) Put hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1 into your /boot/loader.conf.local Thanks, that did the trick. Could we, maybe, add a little note about this to the

5.0-RELEASE ports.tgz file missing?

2003-01-31 Thread Dimitry Andric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I heard from several friends who did FTP installs of 5.0-RELEASE, that the installer was unable to install the ports collection. So I checked the various FTP sites, and to my amazement I couldn't find the ports.tgz file on any of them! See for

Re: fxp0 device timeout on 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Tom Rhodes
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:14:29 +0300 Sergey A. Osokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:32:07AM +0100, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: Am Do, 2003-01-30 um 12.41 schrieb Sergey A. Osokin: 3) Put hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1 into your /boot/loader.conf.local

Re: 5.0-RELEASE ports.tgz file missing?

2003-01-31 Thread Scott Long
Dimitry Andric wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I heard from several friends who did FTP installs of 5.0-RELEASE, that the installer was unable to install the ports collection. So I checked the various FTP sites, and to my amazement I couldn't find the ports.tgz file on

Re: copy extended attributes

2003-01-31 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
I'm starting to have a bad feeling about mergemaster and /etc's full of acl and mac labels... Robert Watson wrote: I have local patches submitted by Chris Faulhaber to copy ACLs when a file is copied (or moved between file systems) that I've been meaning to finish testing and merge. Likewise,

Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Christoph Kukulies
Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? If this won't work, I'm afraid I will have to set a dedicated redhat 6.x/7.x beside my FreeBSD gateway. Would it be

Re: Profiling kills -current?

2003-01-31 Thread Tim Robbins
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:17:39PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: Looks like recent commits may have broken profiling of user applications; or rather, it's also causing the kernel to crash. I suspect (but have not confirmed) it was the recent KSE commit. This commit should have fixed the

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: 4.7-amd cannot mount exports from 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 21:52 schrieb Martin Blapp: Hi, Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs Feel free to add this patch:

ACPI kernel: no ata0 / no ide disks

2003-01-31 Thread Thomas Stratmann
Hi everyone, I finally got 5.0 of last week on my Tosh. Libretto 110ct running. Took me several days of headache and bootstrap problems, nfs mount and chroot finally solved my problems. (My laptop is a multiboot box with a 4.7 FBSD as well so I could mount the filesystem dedicated to the 5.0

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:58:15 -0800 From: David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] I asked the question in hopes that there would be some neat feature of cvsup that mocked up some CVS metadata for me, but since nobody has mentioned any such thing, I guess I'm out of luck. Mirroring the entire

Re: last KSE changes

2003-01-31 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2003-01-28 11:24:41 (-0800), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW** the breakages have been fixed, since no-one has told me directl of any current breakages. If you have any breakage from this commit, PLEASE TELL ME!

5.0-R: no network connectivity with generic kernel andfirewall_enable=YES

2003-01-31 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
Hi, I couldn't connect to anything on the network with my 5.0-RELEASE, with the generic kernel and rc.conf containing firewall_enable=YES natd_interface=fxp0 natd_interface=fxp0 natd_flags=-t 255.255.255.255 The firewall loaded ok but natd silently vanished. When I tried to

Re: last KSE changes

2003-01-31 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2003-01-31 15:13:29 (+0100), Philip Paeps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2003-01-28 11:24:41 (-0800), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW** the breakages have been fixed, since no-one has told me directl of any current

Re: stropts.h removed?

2003-01-31 Thread Mike Barcroft
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A number of ports have started to complain about a missing stropts.h header..was this recently removed, and if so then what is the fix? I don't think we've ever supported STREAMS. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

psm not working on Toshiba 1905-s301 and 5.0 Release

2003-01-31 Thread Jason
I searched the archives, found a few similair problems, and possible resolutions, but none have worked for me. In windows, it is shown as an Alps Glidepoint on irq12, however fbsd refuses to find it. The device.hints file shows the correct info. I ran acpidump, but was not quite sure what to

ftpd mkdir problems

2003-01-31 Thread David Rhodus
Using the default ftpd that comes with FreeBSD, in the mkdir command, why doesn't it expand '~', the cd and rmdir commands seem to. Passing over the code it just calls the c function with should expand it. ftp cd ~will 250 CWD command successful. ftp mkdir ~will/test 550 ~will/test: No such

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Chris BeHanna
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:58, David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Christopher Vance [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:07:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: : On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:05:06PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: : Thus spake Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : On Thu, Jan

RE: Smart Array 5312 (Compaq)

2003-01-31 Thread Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)
Thanks, Paul! I talked to our storage experts and as long as the driver already has 5i support, then all that's needed is to add the new id (which your patch does). Thanks, John John Cagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Principal Member Technical Staff Industry

Re: Fun and excitement with CURRENT

2003-01-31 Thread Kevin Oberman
From: stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 30 Jan 2003 22:43:33 -0500 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, I've got just 1.5 bugs left, then I'll be all CURRENT-ed :) (I'm using a brand new laptop. Much different than getting BSD working on my desktops and servers :) Things that work : - Making

Re: psm not working on Toshiba 1905-s301 and 5.0 Release

2003-01-31 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Fri, 2003/01/31 at 10:00:28 -0500, Jason wrote: I searched the archives, found a few similair problems, and possible resolutions, but none have worked for me. In windows, it is shown as an Alps Glidepoint on irq12, however fbsd refuses to find it. The device.hints file shows the

Re: psm not working on Toshiba 1905-s301 and 5.0 Release

2003-01-31 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 at 10:00 -0500, Jason wrote: I searched the archives, found a few similair problems, and possible resolutions, but none have worked for me. Perhaps you have already seen my Toshiba Satellite 1005-S157 page which discusses a similar problem. See:

Re: stropts.h removed?

2003-01-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:21:51AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A number of ports have started to complain about a missing stropts.h header..was this recently removed, and if so then what is the fix? I don't think we've ever supported STREAMS.

Re: last KSE changes

2003-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
Your sources are way out of date.. specifically I think it looks like sys/proc.h is not being updated.. On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Philip Paeps wrote: On 2003-01-28 11:24:41 (-0800), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW** the

Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Trish Lynch
So, at the request of bmilekic, I ran netpipe on a hyperthreading box (non hyperthreading, I'll do when I can turn it off in BIOS next time I'm down there) however, I got a hint to turn machdep.cpu_idle_hlt on. Dmesg: (With Hyperthreading) CPU: Pentium 4 (1796.94-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:58:15PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: I don't know about Steve, but cvsup is the wrong answer for me because it's a mirroring tool and not a version control tool. Among the things I would like to do are: - Update

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
:So, at the request of bmilekic, I ran netpipe on a hyperthreading box (non :hyperthreading, I'll do when I can turn it off in BIOS next time I'm down :there) :... : :The results are here: : :http://bsdunix.net/performance : :all information on what command line options I used is in there. : :the

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Matthew Dillon wrote: :So, at the request of bmilekic, I ran netpipe on a hyperthreading box (non :hyperthreading, I'll do when I can turn it off in BIOS next time I'm down :there) :... : :The results are here: : :http://bsdunix.net/performance : :all information on what command line options I

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
Trish, Thanks for the tests, it would be good to also get results with hyperthreading turned off. However, I need you to pass the -o option to NPtcp and get an actual dat file, so that you can generate the graphs using the gnuplot config file I asked you to download. Having

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Trish Lynch
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote: Trish, Thanks for the tests, it would be good to also get results with hyperthreading turned off. However, I need you to pass the -o option to NPtcp and get an actual dat file, so that you can generate the graphs using the gnuplot

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread leafy
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:45:56PM -0500, Trish Lynch wrote: I have the .dat's for you, unfortunately, the output is different, so you'll have to modify the .cfg for gnuplot :) -Trish I have HTT for my CPU, is there any hack to the BIOS to enable HyperThreading? Jiawei Ye -- Without the

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Kenneth Culver
I have HTT for my CPU, is there any hack to the BIOS to enable HyperThreading? You might try updating your BIOS. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
:AFAIK, full hyperthreading support, as it is, has been merged to :-stable. It consists of a patch to recognize the virtual CPUs, so they :will be dealt with like any SMP system, as long as HTT is enabled on the :BIOS. : :-- :Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) :Gerencia de Operacoes

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:08:38AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: :AFAIK, full hyperthreading support, as it is, has been merged to :-stable. It consists of a patch to recognize the virtual CPUs, so they :will be dealt with like any SMP system, as long as HTT is enabled on the :BIOS. :

NFS over TCP doesn't umount

2003-01-31 Thread Tim Kientzle
Tinkering with NFS over TCP through a firewall, I ran across the following: # mount_nfs -3TN server:/path /mnt Generates the following traffic: UDP exchanges with server port 111 (rpcbind) TCP exchanges with server ports 1023 and 2049 That is, if your firewall allows UDP 111 through,

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Peter Wemm
Bosko Milekic wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:08:38AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: :AFAIK, full hyperthreading support, as it is, has been merged to :-stable. It consists of a patch to recognize the virtual CPUs, so they :will be dealt with like any SMP system, as long as HTT is

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
: Why do you think that hlt-ing the CPU(s) when idle would actually : improve performance in this case? My only suspicion is that perhaps : this reduces scheduling on the auxiliary 'logical' (fake) CPUs, : thereby indirectly reducing cache ping-ponging and abuse. I would : imagine that

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
:The cache and most of the execution hardware is shared. The execution :units can run something like 4 instructions per clock. If the idle :logical core is in a spinloop, then it is generating instructions for :execution, so you are dividing the execution resources between one context :that is

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Trish Lynch
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Peter Wemm wrote: Personally, I doubt that HTT will buy much on FreeBSD, apart from being buzzword compliant. I'd actually like a compile option or boot tunable so that it to be turned on or off (and treated like a regular Xeon SMP system). Single-physical-cpu systems

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Matthew Dillon wrote: :So, at the request of bmilekic, I ran netpipe on a hyperthreading box (non :hyperthreading, I'll do when I can turn it off in BIOS next time I'm down :there) :... : :The results are here: : :http://bsdunix.net/performance :

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 leafy wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:45:56PM -0500, Trish Lynch wrote: I have the .dat's for you, unfortunately, the output is different, so you'll have to modify the .cfg for gnuplot :) -Trish I have HTT for my CPU, is there any hack to the BIOS to enable HyperThreading?

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote: :AFAIK, full hyperthreading support, as it is, has been merged to :-stable. It consists of a patch to recognize the virtual CPUs, so they :will be dealt with like any SMP system, as long as HTT is enabled on the :BIOS. : :-- :Daniel C. Sobral

RE: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Don Bowman
From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :The cache and most of the execution hardware is shared. The execution :units can run something like 4 instructions per clock. If the idle :logical core is in a spinloop, then it is generating instructions for :execution, so you are

CD/RW Hangs with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Scott R.
Hello, This is the first time since adopting 5.0 that I've tried to do anything with my cd drive and I'm finding it impossible to work with. First, I installed ripit so that I could convert a couple CD's to mp3's. This fails with: dagrab: read raw ioctl failed at lba 0 length 12:

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: AT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,b28,ACC It has HTT set but it's only a 1.2GHz box and I heard somewhere that only 2+ GHz P4's had hyperthreading. I noticed some MFCs to stable that suggested hyperthreading

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 31-Jan-2003 leafy wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:45:56PM -0500, Trish Lynch wrote: I have the .dat's for you, unfortunately, the output is different, so you'll have to modify the .cfg for gnuplot :) -Trish I have HTT for my CPU, is

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: AT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,b28,ACC It has HTT set but it's only a 1.2GHz box and I heard somewhere that only 2+ GHz P4's had hyperthreading. I noticed some MFCs to

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 31-Jan-2003 leafy wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:45:56PM -0500, Trish Lynch wrote: I have the .dat's for you, unfortunately, the output is different, so you'll have to modify the .cfg for gnuplot

Re: NFS over TCP doesn't umount

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, # umount /mnt Bad MNT RPC: RPC: Timed out This behaviour is the same since we support NFS over TCP. The problem is, that the state of the nfs_mount isn't stored. That means that umount cannot look at the mountflags and decide what protocol it likes to use. Of course we can change

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 31-Jan-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: AT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,b28,ACC It has HTT set but it's only a 1.2GHz box and I heard somewhere that only 2+

Re: stropts.h removed?

2003-01-31 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:33:55 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hmm..there must be something in the configure script that thinks we do. http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/alpha-5-latest/nvi-1.81.5_2.log It erroneously thinks that because we have the grantpt() function, we have

Turn $25 into $45,000 MONTHLY, all automatic! 2588CMRd2-598mGjG7972Raq-23

2003-01-31 Thread newhsave
This is IT! Don't miss out in this amazing opportunity. Join now for $25 and earn up to $45,000 MONTHLY Yes, I said monthly AND IT IS ALL AUTOMATED. Get FREE information. Just click the link below. www.mlmontarget.com This is FREE information that will amaze you on how much MONEY YOU CAN

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
what is the protocol they are using? On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? If this won't work, I'm

Re: dump -L and privilege

2003-01-31 Thread Eugene M. Kim
Moreover, the fact that the number of snapshots allowed on a filesystem is limited to a handful (src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.snapshot says 20) makes it possible for normal users to disrupt dump -L and other important operations that require snapshots. Alternative 2 seems a lot more sensible. Just my

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:53:24AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? That's just it. FreeBSD can run Linux

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 31-Jan-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Baldwin wrote: AT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,b28,ACC It has HTT set but it's only a 1.2GHz box

KDE 3.1 Packages now available for 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-31 Thread Andy Fawcett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We (kde@) have had some reported problems with the -CURRENT packages we made for KDE 3.1, not working correctly on FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE, possibly due to our build system having a slightly newer than -RELEASE build of 5.0 on it. Arjan van

Mylex support under 5.0-R

2003-01-31 Thread Simon
Hi, Is it just me or is the Mylex driver broken under FreeBSD 5.0-Release? I couldn't dig up anything related in archives. I'm aware of bootup issues using Mylex cards, but I already have it installed on IDE and trying to work with a drive connected to a mylex controller locks up the system.

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Julian Elischer wrote: what is the protocol they are using? IPSec + IKE + group extensions. The extensions are the problem. On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Smart Array 5312 (Compaq)

2003-01-31 Thread John
Well looks like it does work after all! I must not have created my install floppies correctly (panic was couldn't find init btw) . I moved a few a drives onto a 5i just so i could get 5.0 installed and running and recompiled the kernel with said patch and i can see and write to the drives. i

State of the Union Report (backout request department)

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Linimon
(This is just a view from the sidelines; I generally do ports hacking and not kernel hacking, and thus my views might not carry much weight, but here goes anyways). One of the more interesting features of the FreeBSD development model seems to me to be the ability for people to request

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Sean Chittenden
Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? If this won't work, I'm afraid I will have to set a dedicated redhat 6.x/7.x beside my FreeBSD gateway. Would

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 31), Don Bowman said: Thus the worst thing you could have would be a nop-loop with no stalls, which would squeeze the other to death. I don't think this is possible, from looking at Intel's white papers. In practise I've found intel's numbers to be true, that the SMT

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 20:28, Sean Chittenden wrote: Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? If this won't work, I'm afraid I will have to set a

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Sean Chittenden wrote: Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? If this won't work, I'm afraid I will have to set a dedicated redhat 6.x/7.x beside my

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Brandon S. Allbery
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 21:20, Marcin Dalecki wrote: The connection hijack by Cisco is indeed a very silly thing, Unfortunately, it's there because some corporate network policies demand it. And some companies are loath to allow Linux/FreeBSD/etc. on their networks because it can be defeated. --

Re: State of the Union Report (backout request department)

2003-01-31 Thread Mike Barcroft
Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (This is just a view from the sidelines; I generally do ports hacking and not kernel hacking, and thus my views might not carry much weight, but here goes anyways). One of the more interesting features of the FreeBSD development model seems to me to be

Re: State of the Union Report (backout request department)

2003-01-31 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-31 ] [ Subjecte: Re: State of the Union Report (backout request department) ] The archives might not be telling the whole story. A lot of times these things get handled behind closed doors, whether private e-mail or developer-only

Re: State of the Union Report (backout request department)

2003-01-31 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: The archives might not be telling the whole story. A lot of times these things get handled behind closed doors, whether private e-mail or developer-only lists. Thankfully though, most conflicts *do* get resolved. :) I have always LOVED watching the

Re: dump -L and privilege

2003-01-31 Thread Kirk McKusick
From: Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dump -L and privilege In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match Is this enough? -r-sr-x--- 1 root

Re: Smart Array 5312 (Compaq)

2003-01-31 Thread Paul Saab
John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Well looks like it does work after all! I must not have created my install floppies correctly (panic was couldn't find init btw) . I moved a few a drives onto a 5i just so i could get 5.0 installed and running and recompiled the kernel with said patch and i can

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-30 21:38, David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Use the r version of the cvs commands (like cvs rlog and rdiff). They operate on the repository remotely, so you don't need to have the files checked out localy. That's a pretty good

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2003-01-30 21:38, David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Use the r version of the cvs commands (like cvs rlog and rdiff). They operate on the repository remotely, so you don't need to have the

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-31 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current ] On 2003-01-30 21:38, David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Use the r version of the cvs commands (like

Re: State of the Union Report (backout request department)

2003-01-31 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: The archives might not be telling the whole story. A lot of times these things get handled behind closed doors, whether private e-mail or developer-only lists. Thankfully though, most conflicts *do*

Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current

2003-01-31 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * De: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-31 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Seat-belt for source upgrades from stable to current ] On 2003-01-30 21:38, David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

RE: intalling from cds

2003-01-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jan-2003 Kirk R Wythers wrote: I ran into a strange issue while trying to do a cd install from the 5.0-RELEASE cds. After booting from the cd, the install skips the kernel configuration menue completely (I've never seen that before), then jumps right into sysinsall. I select 'standard

intalling from cds

2003-01-31 Thread Kirk R Wythers
I ran into a strange issue while trying to do a cd install from the 5.0-RELEASE cds. After booting from the cd, the install skips the kernel configuration menue completely (I've never seen that before), then jumps right into sysinsall. I select 'standard install', and I see the folloing: afd0 da0

Re: copy extended attributes

2003-01-31 Thread Doug Barton
Forgive me for being dense, but can you expand on your concerns? Doug On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: I'm starting to have a bad feeling about mergemaster and /etc's full of acl and mac labels... Robert Watson wrote: I have local patches submitted by Chris Faulhaber to