Re: Synaptics touchpad support

2003-02-11 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: Probably the best thing to do would be to disassemble the BIOS on your box, knowing the difference between the older driver's interface, and use the same techniques that were hidden from the older driver (and just built in instead). I doubt that would help.

Re: MSDOSFS wastes 256k when nothing is mounted!

2003-02-11 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:48 +1100 Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hashinit() can sleep, and I don't think it's safe to sleep here (msdosfs_hashget() and msdosfs_hashins()) with dehash_mtx and sometimes a vnode lock held. Doh! I should have noticed that. It might be better to

Re: Best method to produce patches?

2003-02-11 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:33:41PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote the words in effect of: I am about to try to make some changes to FreeBSD current... Should I begin to use read-only CVS instead of CVSup for this work or is it possible to generate diffs based on CVSup'd sources? What is the

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:48:31 -0500 Rahul Siddharthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To the OP -- any speed improvement from gcc 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 would probably be marginal. If some particular port really bothers you with its slow performance, try recompiling (though it's unlikely to help), otherwise

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Paul A. Mayer
Hmmm, fails to build for me: FreeBSD asus 5.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Mon Feb 10 10:39:34 CET 2003 root@asus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ASUS i386 gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc32/work/build/gcc' for d in libgcc; do \ if [ -d $d ]; then true; else /bin/sh

panic with heavy io

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Santcroos
While doing heavy IO (updating my p4 repo) on my laptop I got the following panic. (I was running in X so both backtrace and dmesg are from the core dump after reboot) I'm wondering whether the ENOMEM's reported by GEOM point out that GEOM has a problem or just tell us that the machine was out

Re: panic with heavy io

2003-02-11 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Santcroos writes: While doing heavy IO (updating my p4 repo) on my laptop I got the following panic. (I was running in X so both backtrace and dmesg are from the core dump after reboot) I'm wondering whether the ENOMEM's reported by GEOM point out that GEOM has

Re: panic with heavy io

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:21:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #14 0xc01edc00 in spec_xstrategy (vp=0xc23046c0, bp=0xc7502da8) at ../../../fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:596 This doesn't correspond to my sourcefile, but you should examine this one. Sorry, I should have do the backtrace on the

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread Peter Wemm
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: panic with heavy io

2003-02-11 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Santcroos writes: 596: DEV_STRATEGY(bp); I don't understand what you want me to examine there as the arguments are not usefull anymore (or are they?). Well that line in my copy was not code, so I just wanted to see what your sources said. #15 0xc01edc7b in

sysinstall disk mess

2003-02-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I have a ar0 mirror with 120GB diskspace. I don't know if this is a known problem yet, but I had done the following steps which lead to a failure situation: 1.) Created a partition 2.) Created some slices 3.) Started a installation, abouted it because no net-device was found. 4.)

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-02-11 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks. I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example ssh) enough for this task? I would think at least a serial console access is needed... --[

FreeBSD 5.0 as SOHO firewall, gateway -- STABLE?

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I did see that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody relate their experience with the OS release? I am looking for cases in

RE: FreeBSD 5.0 as SOHO firewall, gateway -- STABLE?

2003-02-11 Thread Lawrence Farr
Im running a CURRENT gateway at home with an iSDN line and a wireless card in hostap mode. Hasn't missed a beat since I replaced the previous (4.7) with DP2. Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Thomas

Link problems with BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet on IBM X-Series 305

2003-02-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I experience strange problems with this Gigabit card. It attaches correctly, but there is no activity until I set one time the promiscous mode, after that it works. So I wonder why this happens. Is something wrong with the filter ? Maybe we just have to turn on/off promiscous mode in

named chroot rcNG devfs

2003-02-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, /etc/rc.d/named copies /dev with pax to the named chroot directory. This is obviously wrong with devfs, isn't it? Bye, Alexander. -- Where do you think you're going today? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-02-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Attila Nagy wrote: Hello, He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks. I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example ssh) enough for this task? I would think at least

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 as SOHO firewall, gateway -- STABLE?

2003-02-11 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I did see that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody relate their experience with the OS release? I am

Re: named chroot rcNG devfs

2003-02-11 Thread marius
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:59:31PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, /etc/rc.d/named copies /dev with pax to the named chroot directory. This is obviously wrong with devfs, isn't it? /etc/rc.d/named is quite bogus, especially when it comes to running bind chrooted. E.g. /dev/null isn't

Re: named chroot rcNG devfs

2003-02-11 Thread Dimitry Andric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-02-11 at 20:29:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mafd E.g. /dev/null isn't needed by bind8 at all (also checked with mafd ktrace), not sure about bind9 though as it uses daemon(3) which mafd tries to open it. On my 4.7-STABLE box, bind9 uses

RE: appending files on smbfs

2003-02-11 Thread Patrick Stinson
hello, tim. the patch you sent me did fix the problem stated, but now I've noticed some interesting characteristics of the files that are created by a unix machine on a share mounted by mount_smbfs, which itself resides on a windows 200 machine. I haven't looked into the details, but I'm using

Random System Lockups

2003-02-11 Thread Simon Watson
Hi, Having recently cvsupped to the latest current I have been experiencing complete system freezes - by that I mean the system disappears, cannot be pinged, nothing can be done on the console etc. The are no error messages relatin to the crash in /var/log/messages and no weird application

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Anders Andersson
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:14:58AM +0800, leafy wrote: lcms post-build tests now finishes correctly with pentium4 optimizations. And I have world with the p4 optimization with no ill-effact so far. No, it still fails. This is on a new world built with CPUTYPE?=p4 and then: 'portupgrade -f

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 as SOHO firewall, gateway -- STABLE?

2003-02-11 Thread Atte Peltomaki
I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I did see that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody relate their experience with the OS release? I am looking for cases in

i386 tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread phk
/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c: In function `g_bde_config': /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:251: structure has no member named `slicesize' /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:252: structure has no member named `sliceoffset' My fault, already fixed. --

[Fwd: panic: don't do that ?]

2003-02-11 Thread David Vidal Rodríguez
Hi! I've sent this post to comp.unix.bsd.freebsd, and I've been told that I should report the problem to this list, so... Original Message Hi folks! I was trying to modularize the sound in my 5.0R machine, which has two sound cards: $ dmesg | grep pcm.: pcm0: VIA VT82C686A

C conformance.

2003-02-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 09 Feb 2003 19:43:38 +0100, Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the folowing error /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h, line 42: Error: [ISO 6.8]: Unknown preprocessing directive, '#warning'. It should probably be a #error

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sio issue

2003-02-11 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, lately, I end up in ddb when I connect my (unconnected) serial console cable to another machine. It's not critical, since c will continue fine, but it's annoying. Here's a trace: db trace siointr1(c635a,0,c0361fb6,671,df101ce8) at siointr1+0x3c4 siointr(c635a000) at siointr+0x35

Re: C conformance.

2003-02-11 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-02-11 ] [ Subjecte: C conformance. ] On Sun, 09 Feb 2003 19:43:38 +0100, Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the folowing error /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h, line 42:

Re: C conformance.

2003-02-11 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 7:01 PM -0500 2/11/03, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2003, Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the folowing error: /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h, line 42: Error: [ISO 6.8]: Unknown preprocessing directive,

WITNESS questions

2003-02-11 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Dear Hackers, Does WITNESS keeps track of particular mutex instance or just places where particular mutex type was acquired and released? Is it even possible to keep track of individual instance of the particular mutex type? Here is my problem. In my code (Bluetooth sockets layers) each

error in nsdispatch.c

2003-02-11 Thread David Leimbach
There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c in the function const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name). The static variable static time_t confmod; is not initialized to anything. It may have some random value the first time this function is called and if you look at the program

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread leafy
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:11:39PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote: Testing curves join ...failed! *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/lcms/work/lcms-1.09/testbed. *** Error code 1 So, the lcms port still fails with CPUTYPE=p4 and there seems to be other issues still with

Re: error in nsdispatch.c

2003-02-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:37:31PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote: There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c in the function const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name). The static variable static time_t confmod; is not initialized to anything. It may

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: Anders Yes I noticed it this morning too. The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus. That's odd. Does the

Re: error in nsdispatch.c

2003-02-11 Thread David Leimbach
Bug? no. static variables are initialized with all-zeroes. Groovy... /me goes to buy electronic ANSI C standard :P Dave /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread leafy
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus. That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build skill

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: Anders Yes I noticed it this morning too. The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it

Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions

2003-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: Anders Yes I noticed it this morning too. The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it

gbde

2003-02-11 Thread lattera
I keep ketting errors when trying to make my root filesystem encrypted: bash-2.05b# gbde init /dev/ad0s2a gbde: /dev/ad0s2a: No such file or directory bash-2.05b# bash-2.05b# ls /dev/ad0* /dev/ad0/dev/ad0s2 /dev/ad0s2b /dev/ad0s2d /dev/ad0s2f /dev/ad0s1 /dev/ad0s2a