Re: CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/4/12 8:39 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written for Copan Systems under Linux starting in

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2012-01-05 Thread Denny Lin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:52:06PM -0800, Matthew Tippett wrote: Hmm... No sure what happened there again. What I sent (pulled from my Sent folder... === Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on Phoronix.com http://Phoronix.com, Michael invariable leaves it in the

Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled?

2012-01-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes: Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required. It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled. Would it be possible to remove them from standard and make them optional? Or is there a reason to keep it in base? I

Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled?

2012-01-05 Thread John Baldwin
[ A bit excessive on the cross-posting? arch@ alone was probably fine ] On Thursday, January 05, 2012 2:57:44 am Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, I'm trying to slim down the freebsd kernel to fit on some devices with 4MB of flash. Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code

Re: CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-05 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:03:57 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/4/12 8:39 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2012-01-05 Thread Alex Kuster
On 01/04/2012 20:52, Matthew Tippett wrote: As a service to the community or vendor that publishes the tuning guide, Michael is more than willing to redo a tuned vs untuned comparison. To date, the communities have never taken us up on that offer. In part, this affects Phoronix.com

Re: bsdinstall kbdmap

2012-01-05 Thread Jakub Lach
As I said before, it's not related, because your problem is X/ hal related, and I was speaking of syscons. Can you set language in X by x11/setxkbmap? You are using hald, and xorg.conf is probably ignored. If you insist on keeping hal,

Re: Apropos Removal of sysinstall

2012-01-05 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 01/04/12 14:56, Warner Losh wrote: On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: On 29/12/2011 18:39, Renato Botelho wrote: IIRC, PCBSD installer can install a regular FreeBSD on ZFS. It can do, but you're left with a /very/ basic installation - the hostname, network interfaces etc.

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 13:05:41 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 13:05:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-01-05 13:05:41 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 13:06:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 13:06:00 -

Re: bsdinstall kbdmap

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: I really appreciate your help but I am having a hard time understanding because this has been working perfectly on FreeBSD 9.0 since new. ( 4 months ago ) Just incase it is important. # uname -a  FreeBSD

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 14:56:19 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 14:56:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-05 14:56:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 14:56:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 14:56:37 -

Re: bsdinstall kbdmap

2012-01-05 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: I really appreciate your help but I am having a hard time understanding because this has been working perfectly on FreeBSD 9.0 since new. (

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 15:20:59 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 15:20:59 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-05 15:20:59 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 15:21:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 15:21:19 -

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:29 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:29 -

WITH_ICONV/WITH_BSD_GREP: Defaults?

2012-01-05 Thread O. Hartmann
In FreeBSD 9 and 10, src.conf could be populated with those two knobs WITH_ICONV and WITH_BSD_GREP For some testing purposes, I switched them both to enabled, so I could test ports and software against these. I didn't realize any serious issue with WITH_BSD_GREP, but I read, some time ago, that

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:30 -

stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-05 Thread Peter
Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources, built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default pointing at -current: pkbsdpkg:#uname -a FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r229599: Thu Jan 5 10:23:52 MST 2012

WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 fails with CLANG:

2012-01-05 Thread O. Hartmann
When compiling most recent CURRENT on amd64 platform, using CLANG and enabled WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS, I receive the follwing error since two days now. Build shown below was made avoiding -jX when doing buildworld. [SNIP] rpcgen -C -c /usr/src/lib/librpcsvc/../../include/rpcsvc/ypupdate_prot.x -o

Re: WITH_ICONV/WITH_BSD_GREP: Defaults?

2012-01-05 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.01.05. 21:04, O. Hartmann wrote: In FreeBSD 9 and 10, src.conf could be populated with those two knobs WITH_ICONV and WITH_BSD_GREP For some testing purposes, I switched them both to enabled, so I could test ports and software against these. I didn't realize any serious issue with

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-01-05 18:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:21:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 18:21:04 -

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-05 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello,  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources, built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default pointing at -current: pkbsdpkg:#uname -a FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-05 22:35:12 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-05 22:35:12 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-05 22:35:12 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-05 22:35:35 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-05 22:35:35 -

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:31 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:31 -

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-01-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-01-06 01:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-06 01:41:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-06 01:41:04 -

Re: bsdinstall kbdmap

2012-01-05 Thread Lars Engels
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:47:53PM +, Tom Evans wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: I really appreciate your help but I am having a hard time understanding because this has been working perfectly on FreeBSD 9.0 since new. ( 4 months ago

Re: WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 fails with CLANG:

2012-01-05 Thread Roman Divacky
what makes you think you're using clang? On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:20:34PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: When compiling most recent CURRENT on amd64 platform, using CLANG and enabled WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS, I receive the follwing error since two days now. Build shown below was made avoiding -jX when