Re: squealing/whistling audio

2012-09-19 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/18/2012 10:56 PM, matt wrote: On 09/18/12 18:01, Doug Barton wrote: Sometime in the last couple of months an old problem has resurfaced on HEAD, a sort of squealing/whistling sound in the audio, even without anything playing. The sound is similar to the wind whistling through something.

Re: squealing/whistling audio

2012-09-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:56 PM, matt sendtom...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/18/12 18:01, Doug Barton wrote: Sometime in the last couple of months an old problem has resurfaced on HEAD, a sort of squealing/whistling sound in the audio, even without anything playing. The sound is similar to the

Re: squealing/whistling audio

2012-09-19 Thread matt
On 09/18/12 23:00, Doug Barton wrote: On 9/18/2012 10:56 PM, matt wrote: On 09/18/12 18:01, Doug Barton wrote: Sometime in the last couple of months an old problem has resurfaced on HEAD, a sort of squealing/whistling sound in the audio, even without anything playing. The sound is similar to

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Attilio Rao
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao

Re: Call for bge(4) testers

2012-09-19 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:27 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: All, There were lots of reports that stock bge(4) does not work on Dell Rx20/HP DL 360 G8. With the help of Broadcom and BCM5719/BCM5720 users I managed to address the issue but I had to touch very sensitive part of driver. Before

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-19 Thread Darrel
It should be part of the checkout. Try: man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5 found it. :) Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10? No. So I ran mergemaster and upgraded zpool from '28' to 'zpool-features' and installed the new bootcode to ada0

Re: squealing/whistling audio

2012-09-19 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Doug Barton wrote: Sometime in the last couple of months an old problem has resurfaced on HEAD, a sort of squealing/whistling sound in the audio, even without anything playing. The sound is similar to the wind whistling through something. Before I blindly go off on a

g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed

2012-09-19 Thread James R. Van Artsdalen
GOHORNS:/usr/src/sys# uname -a FreeBSD GOHORNS.housenet.jrv 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240529: Sat Sep 15 03:10:21 CDT 2012 r...@gohorns.housenet.jrv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am getting an error when attaching some disks from Mac OSX. This is an enclose of 5 SATA disks

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Attilio Rao
On 9/19/12, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at

Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-current. I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources are in this unbootable VM too :) Kernel is GENERIC. VBox

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-current. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to LS build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) LS revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources LS are in this

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :) Adrian On 19 September 2012 13:37, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Freebsd-current. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to LS build router's

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:41:20: It looks like patch to RTC which is useful on Geode LX causes this hang. AC 240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :) I'm testing theory (build kernel from fresh sources), that it is caused by local RTC patch, which helps

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:37 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Freebsd-current. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00: LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to LS build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4) LS revision. Unfortunately,

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ah, what's the patch? adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get IL committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to IL learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what IL the problem is (offhand,I

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Ian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get IL committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to IL learn enough about

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:00 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Ian. You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24: IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get IL committed because it locks up virtualbox.

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that condition. Also, what's that RTCSA_8192 bit do? That should set the interrupt rate

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that condition. Also, what's

Re: g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed

2012-09-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/09/2012 21:16 James R. Van Artsdalen said the following: GOHORNS:/usr/src/sys# uname -a FreeBSD GOHORNS.housenet.jrv 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240529: Sat Sep 15 03:10:21 CDT 2012 r...@gohorns.housenet.jrv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am getting an error when

[RFC] how to get real ifi_baudrate from network interface

2012-09-19 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
hello, for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G interfaces lie about their ifi_baudrate. i would like to propose simple (hopefuly) change to address this. quick summary of the problem: struct if_data { ... u_char ifi_spare_char1;/* spare byte */

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at probe/attach, or during normal operation? It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc device. Right. Just have it loop over say 100

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:30 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at probe/attach, or during normal operation? It's called just once, from the attach() routine

Re: Call for bge(4) testers

2012-09-19 Thread Wanpeng Qian
Hi, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:37:21PM +0900, Wanpeng Qian wrote: Hi, here is the dmesg output. bge0: HP NC107i PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter, ASIC rev. 0x5784100 mem 0xfe9f-0xfe9f irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 bge0: CHIP ID 0x05784100; ASIC REV 0x5784; CHIP REV 0x57841; PCI-E

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: ... Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: ... Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:10 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: ... Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get committed

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-09-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:57:30 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote: ... Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to learn enough

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/18/2012 9:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: In addition to fusefs-kmod, Bryan and Florian have also updated fusefs-lib and fusefs-ntfs ports. For instance, please refer to this e-mail: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-August/077950.html Even if this work is someway

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [RFC] how to get real ifi_baudrate from network interface

2012-09-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:16:17PM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: M hello, M M for sometime now i've been repeatedly annoyed by the fact that 10G M interfaces lie about their ifi_baudrate. i would like to propose M simple (hopefuly) change to address this. M M quick summary of the problem: M M

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 01:23:33 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 01:23:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 00:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:33:13 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:33:13 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:49:21 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:49:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:44:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:44:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 02:45:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 02:45:27 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-09-19 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 19/09/2012 04:48, Attilio Rao wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: ... Alternatively, a kernel patch that should work with HEAD@240684 is here: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_240684.patch I guess the patch can easilly apply to all

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-09-19 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-20 04:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-20 04:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---