Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. what was the previous kernel version? adrian On 9 December 2012 22:08, Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org wrote: I haven't found any useful clues yet, but thought I'd ask if anyone else was seeing hangs in a recent kernel. I just upgraded to r244036 using a straight GENERIC i386 kernel.

Re: please add auditdistd user/group to -stable and the 9.1-release?

2012-12-10 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 09:52:18PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:46 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:08

Re: kernel module parallel build?

2012-12-10 Thread Fleuriot Damien
On Dec 6, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: ... All trolling aside, I believe an awesome fix to be setting module override in /etc/make.conf to only build the 4-5 specific modules one needs. To

Re: rev 244030 route command is not working

2012-12-10 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: A I just upgraded to revision 244030. Unexpected route command is not working: A A #route add default 192.168.1.1 A route: fiboptlist_csv failed. What does 'sysctl net.my_fibnum' say? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.

Re: rev 244030 route command is not working

2012-12-10 Thread Artyom Mirgorodskiy
sysctl net.my_fibnum net.my_fibnum: 0 On Monday 10 December 2012 17:40:57 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: A I just upgraded to revision 244030. Unexpected route command is not working: A A #route add default 192.168.1.1 A route:

Re: 9.1-RC3 LiveCD missing features

2012-12-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:11:37 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote: On 12/7/2012 3:50 PM, CeDeROM wrote: Hello :-) I have tried to chceck for badblocks on my / but I did not find badblocks program on LiveCD and there is no option to install it. This is very useful utility, please add it as part of

Re: rev 244030 route command is not working

2012-12-10 Thread Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Before calling fiboptlist_csv() the errno = EINVAL. I hope this help to solve problem. On Monday 10 December 2012 17:40:57 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: A I just upgraded to revision 244030. Unexpected route command is not working:

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2012 09:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-07 17:43, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/7/2012 6:08 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... With this patch (placed in /usr/ports/devel/dbus-qt4/files), qdbus starts up and exits normally for me. I did

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:35:29AM -0800, Mark Atkinson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2012 09:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-07 17:43, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/7/2012 6:08 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... With this patch (placed in

Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Rick Macklem
Adrian Chadd wrote: .. what was the previous kernel version? Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know the eact rNN.) It seems to predate my commit (r244008), which was my

Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: .. what was the previous kernel version? Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know the eact

Re: ath0: unable to attach hardware

2012-12-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, December 07, 2012 4:59:37 am hu...@hush.com wrote: Hello, thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I'm unexperienced with FreeBSD, and am absolutely unfamiliar with hardware specifics. During this mail conversion, I have heard abour BAR for the first time, and therefore, I

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2012 10:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:35:29AM -0800, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/07/2012 09:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-07 17:43, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/7/2012 6:08 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ...

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:29:20PM -0800, Mark Atkinson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2012 10:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:35:29AM -0800, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/07/2012 09:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-07 17:43,

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2012 12:33, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hmm. Since I took out -O2 and added -g in rebuilding libthr/libc/rtld, I figured I needed to reproduce a new segfault, but the rtld side of things seems broken: Use e.g. cd src/libexec/rtld-elf

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2012 12:45, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/10/2012 12:33, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hmm. Since I took out -O2 and added -g in rebuilding libthr/libc/rtld, I figured I needed to reproduce a new segfault, but the rtld side of things seems

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:13:23PM -0800, Mark Atkinson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2012 12:45, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 12/10/2012 12:33, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hmm. Since I took out -O2 and added -g in rebuilding libthr/libc/rtld, I figured I

Re: [HEADSUP] zfs root pool mounting

2012-12-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: ... (Removing bogus list) If I try and let it import the pool at boot it claims the pool is in a FAULTED state when I point mountroot to /dev/cd0 (one of gjb's snapshot CDs -- thanks!), run service hostid onestart,

Re: problems with threads/destructors in -current with llvm/clang

2012-12-10 Thread Ryan Stone
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com wrote: vex x86-IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF 0xB 0x90 0x90 ==33074== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x380434e9. ==33074==at 0x380434E9: ??? (in /usr/local/lib/valgrind/memcheck-x86-freebsd) ==33074==

Re: ath0: unable to attach hardware

2012-12-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, The fact the initial probe/attach fails by returning 0x means the chip isn't right on the bus. It's either just not mapped in correctly, or it's powered off. If it were just asleep, it'd return 0xdeadc0de or 0xdeadbeef or something similar like that. Try AR_SCR (0x4004) and

Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
I noticed this while checking the logs on one of my test boxes after restarting the network. Any idea where I should start looking into this (has IPv6 enabled but wasn't using it, em/cxgbe/ixgbe interfaces with the ixgbe interfaces lagged previously, but now not)? It looks suspiciously like

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf after it's finalised/freed. I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :( adrian On 10 December 2012 14:22, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed this while checking the logs on one of my test boxes

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread mdf
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf after it's finalised/freed. I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :( Compile with DEBUG_MEMGUARD in the kernel configuration, and then set

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 10 December 2012 15:18, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf after it's finalised/freed. I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :( Compile with

Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: .. what was the previous kernel version? Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them on a Dec. 3 kernel

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10 December 2012 15:18, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf after it's finalised/freed.

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:37:17PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10 December 2012 15:18, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2012-12-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-12-11 02:07:55 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 02:07:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:11:59PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: .. what was the previous kernel version? Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see the hangs

Re: r244036 kernel hangs under load.

2012-12-10 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: .. what was the previous kernel version? Hopefully Tim has it narrowed down more, but I don't see the hangs on a Sept. 7 kernel from head and I do see them on a Dec. 3 kernel from head. (Don't know the eact rNN.) I

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-12-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-12-11 04:09:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 04:09:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-12-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:20 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-12-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-12-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Got bit by compiler not warning on some things. Working on a fix. -Alfred On 12/10/12 10:36 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD

Re: rev 244030 route command is not working

2012-12-10 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Artyom, can you please run route with attached patch and show output? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. Index: route.c === --- route.c (revision 244082) +++ route.c (working copy) @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ goto fiboptlist_csv_ret; }

Re: Memory modified after free - by whom?

2012-12-10 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:18:45PM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote: m On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: m 9216 sounds like a jumbo frame mbuf. So the NIC is writing to an mbuf m after it's finalised/freed. m m I have a similar bug showing up on ath(4) RX. :(

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-12-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-12-11 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---