On 26.07.2013 23:11, Jan Beich wrote: Pedro Giffuni writes: Now, just some food for thought, but if you are unsure your patch applies cleanly, why would you choose to use the -s (silent) option? Because by default patch(1) is overly verbose. At first, I'm only interested if a patch applies
OK; On further revision ... On 26.07.2013 20:01, Jan Beich wrote: bsdpatch doesn't list files of the failed hunks with -C and -s option. This may be less convenient if you edit a patch directly rather than regen it after polluting the tree. $ patch -CEfsp0 -i /path/to/varsym.diff 1 out of 1
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 13:06 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Hi, The following log messages are displayed on a box where I am testing stable/9. It occurs only when trying to shutdown the box: | Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done | Waiting (max 60 seconds) for
What is the reason to have the following option commented out in GENERIC in head: #optionsKDB_TRACE ? Wouldn't it be more helpful to have it enabled? -- Andriy Gapon ___ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
hi all: need your experts' opinions, i tried to compile customized kernel for 8.3 but failed miserably: linking kernel.debug dcons_crom.o(.text+0x388): In function `dcons_crom_post_busreset': /usr/src/sys/dev/dcons/dcons_crom.c:145: undefined reference to `crom_add_chunk'
umass requires SCSI support. Bert you removed scbus, da, and similar. On 2013-07-27 6:00 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: hi all: need your experts' opinions, i tried to compile customized kernel for 8.3 but failed miserably: linking kernel.debug dcons_crom.o(.text+0x388): In function
thank freddie! From: Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com To: gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com Cc: FreeBSD-Current email@example.com Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 9:23 PM Subject: Re: compilation umass requires SCSI support. Bert you removed scbus, da, and