Re: PACKAGESITE spam

2013-12-21 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 12/21/2013 9:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote: I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing

Re: PACKAGESITE spam

2013-12-21 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies, companies can turn it on it they want it. And if you want to save the few extra kB, you can turn it off...

Re: PACKAGESITE spam

2013-12-21 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 12/22/2013 12:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote: On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies

Re: pkg - Shared object libarchive.so.5 not found, required by pkg

2012-11-24 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 11/24/2012 7:38 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Victor Balada Diaz vic...@bsdes.net wrote: You have pkg-static for that kind of problems. You should rebuild pkg port to get pkg working again. So I still need /usr/ports when I use pkg? No. CURRENT is a

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

2012-09-01 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 9/1/2012 7:43 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote: I agree with

Re: Script to set/unset automatic status in PKGNG database

2012-08-30 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote: I today noticed the pkg autoremove command for the first time, which does much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the automatic flag in the pkgng database rather than user input to determine which leaf ports can be removed. Unfortunately,

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

2012-08-25 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 8/24/2012 11:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 8/23/2012 8:03 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 23 August 2012 22:59, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: I tend to agree with Steve here ... we can't be responsible for other people's poorly written docs. This isn't about poorly written docs. This is

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

2012-08-24 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 8/24/2012 3:57 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 23 August 2012 18:19, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is confusing that running the command gets

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

2012-08-23 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 8/23/2012 6:26 PM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a database into the port installation/status, using sed/grep/portmaster/portmanager/.sh

Re: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test

2012-03-30 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9 [...] Please note that normally this will be the last beta version, So we can expect an official package

Re: Beta 3 still not OK

2012-02-11 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 2/11/2012 2:13 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Seems that the sqlite database has changed from beta1 to beta3??? I have all the system running exclusive on pkg there is no more old pkg How can I upgrade the sqlite database from beta1 to beta3??? There is nothing to upgrade. The on-disk

Re: [CFT] pkgng alpha2

2011-12-13 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 12/13/2011 06:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 30/11/2011 22:32 Julien Laffaye said the following: [1] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues [2] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng [3] : http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng [4] : http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pkgng-bsdcan2011.pdf [5] : http

[CFT] pkgng alpha2

2011-11-30 Thread Julien Laffaye
Hi all, We are releasing pkgng (the next pkg_install) alpha2 to the world and we want you to test it! There is no good method to test it: use it as you would in the real world. Of course, you are encouraged to backup your data or test it in some kind of virtualized environment. After using it

Re: FreeBSD ftp mirror sites and pkg_add

2011-11-14 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 11/14/2011 12:45 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: In Arch Linux , package manager Pacman is using a configuration file /etc/pacman.conf with its included files . It is using a file such as the following ( some parts are deleted for message ) : ( obtained from

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 09/15/2011 16:42, Alisson wrote: Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? When it is ready? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: 9.0-BETA1 installer issues

2011-08-03 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 08/03/2011 21:42, Garrett Cooper wrote: also the extension for the file is wrong (it should be txz, right?) pkg_add still use the bzip2 format iirc. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [RFC] rcexecr: rcorder in parallel

2011-06-04 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Buganini bugan...@gmail.com wrote: https://github.com/buganini/rcexecr Currently it is able to determine the exec/wait order There are something I haven't digged in deeply in the self modification part. patches/ideas are welcome. Hello, Thanks for doing

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-26 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Julien Laffaye jlaff...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: At this time I'd just like to suggest you add the use of WAL journal (http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_journal_mode) on database creation

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-26 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:  Developpement site: http://git.etoilebsd.net/pkgng/ FYI, we moved to github[1] in order to have a bug tracker, pull request and code review. Also, I recommend to build from the HEAD of the git repository, to not report

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:  In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to  prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it's amalgamation form  which means it is incorporated in

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote: Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:14:52 +0100): 2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net: Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: if you are going to test on current please notice that make install will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't work anymore. We will workaround that later by

Re: DHCP server in base

2010-09-10 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to do so. The usual discussion goes like this: 1. Get BIND out of the base! 2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with