Re: Time to increase MAXPHYS?

2017-06-05 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:52:36 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/04/17 09:39, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > Hi > > > > One possibility would be to make it MD build-time OTIONS, > > defaulting 1M on regular systems and 128k on smaller systems. > > > > Of course I guess making it a tunable (or

Heads Up: struct disk KBI change

2016-06-21 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
- Forwarded message from "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> - Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:18:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org, svn-src-h...@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r302

Re: Recognizing SMR HDDs

2016-05-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 16:42:10 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:10:14 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 16:00:41 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > protocol

Re: Recognizing SMR HDDs

2016-05-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 15:02:24 +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 26 May 2016 at 14:41, Kenneth D. Merry <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 15:29:21 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:34:45 -0400 > > > "K

Re: Recognizing SMR HDDs

2016-05-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 16:00:41 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 09:41:20 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 15:29:21 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:34:45 -0400 &g

Re: Recognizing SMR HDDs

2016-05-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 15:29:21 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:34:45 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 08:42:53 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > What kind of drive is it? > > &

Re: Recognizing SMR HDDs

2016-05-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 08:42:53 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Now that ken@ has checked in the SMR code I'm wondering how I can see > whether it's having any effect. > > I have a 8TB SMR disk in a USB3 enclosure. Does the kernel emit any > sort of trace to indicate that it sees the drive as

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-25 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 14:36:59 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2016 08:15:11 +0200 > Gary Jennejohn <gljennj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 May 2016 15:10:41 -0400 > > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:35:06 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > > > 25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: > > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are > > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset, > > which triggers a probe...and so

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:46:33 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:00:51 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:41:25 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > The question in my mind is - why are "empty" multiplier ports being > > &g

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 15:58:28 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:05 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > There appears to be a regre

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue,

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 21

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old > > >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old desktop > after update to r300299 > Verbose boot shows the endless cycle of > > ata2: SATA reset: ports status=0x05 > ata2: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > There appears to be a regression in AHCI/ADA behavior since r300207. > > Starting a test kernel at r300293 results in extremely long timeouts > probing ahcich2 for non-existent multiplier ports. > > Here some kernel output: Is this

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 20:07:19 -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Hi Ken, > > I???m against changing the function signature of scsi_ata_pass_16(). Even > if you manage to get things right with symbol versioning, it still leads to > problems of code compatibility. Maybe pre-existing binaries will

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
a versioned library? In other words, what is supposed to happen in the test scenario I tried above, and am I really seeing what is supposed to happen? Thanks, Ken On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 17:37:04 -0500, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I have a new set of SMR patches available. See below for the f

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-01-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 16:50:34 -0800, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Kenneth D. Merry <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > I have a new set of SMR patches available. See below for the full > > explanation. > > > > The primary

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-01-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 14:45:23 +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 05:37:04PM -0500, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > I have a new set of SMR patches available. See below for the full > > explanation. > > > > The primary change here is

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-01-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 20:02:52 +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:38:31AM -0500, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 14:45:23 +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 05:37:04PM -0500, Kenneth D. Merry wr

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2016-01-18 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
: https://people.freebsd.org/~ken/cam_smr.head.20160118.1.txt FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 294100: https://people.freebsd.org/~ken/cam_smr.stable10.20160118.1.txt Testing and comments are welcome. Ken On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:13:09 -0500, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > I have work in pr

Re: CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2015-11-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:48:41 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:13:09PM -0500 I heard the voice of > Kenneth D. Merry, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Testing and comments are welcome. > > GELI does explicit handling of each BIO type, so w

CAM Shingled Disk support patches available

2015-11-18 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I have work in progress patches to add SMR (Shingled Magnetic Recording) support to CAM and GEOM here: FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 290997: https://people.freebsd.org/~ken/cam_smr.head.20151117.1.txt FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 290995:

Re: async pass(4) patches available

2015-11-18 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
bugs and it is stable enough to go into the tree. That will allow others to more easily use the code and add enhancements. Ken On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 16:23:58 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > I have put patches to add an asynchronous interface to the pass(4) driver > and add a ne

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-08-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 17:24:22 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:43:15 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015

Re: Why shoud we cause panic in scsi_da.c?

2015-07-14 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 18:29:36 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. On 13.07.2015 11:51, Kohji Okuno wrote: On 07/13/15 10:11, Kohji Okuno wrote: Could you comment on my quesion? I found panic() in scsi_da.c. Please find the following. I think we should return with error without

camcontrol(8) attrib patches available

2015-05-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I have put patches to camcontrol(8) to implement the attrib subcommand here: FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 283160: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/camcontrol_attrib.20150520.1.txt FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 283161:

Re: async pass(4) patches available

2015-04-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 13:16:04 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 15:39:56 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have put patches to add an asynchronous interface to the pass(4) driver

Re: async pass(4) patches available

2015-04-06 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 15:39:56 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have put patches to add an asynchronous interface to the pass(4) driver and add a new camdd(8) utility here: FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 280857: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken

Re: async pass(4) patches available

2015-03-31 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:49:12 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:23:58PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: Kernel memory for data transferred via the queued interface is allocated from the zone allocator in MAXPHYS sized chunks, and user data is copied in and out

async pass(4) patches available

2015-03-30 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I have put patches to add an asynchronous interface to the pass(4) driver and add a new camdd(8) utility here: FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 280857: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/async_pass.head.20150330.1.txt FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 280856:

Re: SLR140 with new mt(1) [Was: Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test]

2015-03-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 20:26:49 +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bez?glich Kenneth D. Merry's Nachricht vom 28.02.2015 01:08 (localtime): ? Still just works fine ! :-) (stable_10.20150218.1-patchset with LTO2, LTO3 and DDS5) With DDS5, densitiy is reported as unknown. If I remember

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 14:30:26 +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bez?glich Kenneth D. Merry's Nachricht vom 19.02.2015 01:13 (localtime): I have updated the patches. I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, since I committed those separately. I have

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 16:34:34 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote: On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote: On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:43:15 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:45:59 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver that I'm planning to commit in the near future. A description

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver that I'm planning to commit in the near future. A description

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-03-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2015

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-28 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have updated the patches. I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, since I committed those separately. I have

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 17:56:42 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 20:05:05 +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bez?glich Kenneth D. Merry's Nachricht vom 26.02.2015 23:42 (localtime): ? And (untested) patches against FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 278974: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/sa_changes.stable_10.20150218.1.txt

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:57:50 +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bez?glich Kenneth D. Merry's Nachricht vom 19.02.2015 01:13 (localtime): I have updated the patches. I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, since I committed those separately. I have

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-18 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
/sa_changes.stable_10.20150218.1.txt Thanks, Ken On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 17:32:32 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver that I'm planning to commit in the near future. A description of the changes is here and below in this message

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-17 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver that I'm planning to commit in the near future. A description

sa(4) driver changes available for test

2015-02-13 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver that I'm planning to commit in the near future. A description of the changes is here and below in this message. If you have tape hardware and the inclination, I'd appreciate testing and feedback. Rough draft

Re: LSI SAS2008 mps(4) 4TB disk only shows 2TB on CURRENT r255089

2013-09-02 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 13:07:53 -0400, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: Hello list I have two issues that may in fact be both related to the LSI SAS2008 card or the mps(4) driver. this server is running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r255089 1) All of the SSD disks are showing up at SATA2 300MB's

Re: Removing an SDHC card causes a kernel panic on -current

2012-06-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:22:59 -0400, Michael Butler wrote: On 06/26/12 22:29, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 19:41:07 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Michael Butler wrote: As follows, in g_disk_providergone, a NULL pointer reference

Re: Removing an SDHC card causes a kernel panic on -current

2012-06-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 19:41:07 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Michael Butler wrote: As follows, in g_disk_providergone, a NULL pointer reference?: g_disk_providergone() is new in r237518 (by ken); ken cc'd. Can you try the attached patch to sys/geom/geom_disk.c? Also,

Re: minor GEOM disk API change coming

2012-06-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 19:50:01 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I understand problem you are going to fix and I think your patch should do it. What I don't very like is addition of new GEOM method. Now GEOM doesn't need it because all internal open/close operations and provider

Re: minor GEOM disk API change coming

2012-06-21 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 19:53:03 +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 21.06.2012 08:29, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: Fix a bug which causes a panic in daopen(). The panic is caused by a da(4) instance going away while GEOM is still probing it. In this case, the GEOM disk class

Re: minor GEOM disk API change coming

2012-06-21 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 23:58:10 +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 21.06.2012 20:48, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: In this case, the GEOM disk class instance has been created by disk_create(), and the taste of the disk is queued in the GEOM event queue. While that event is queued

minor GEOM disk API change coming

2012-06-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
Hi folks, I have attached some patches that fix an object lifetime issue between CAM and GEOM. Fixing the bug required adding a callback to the GEOM disk code, and adding a callback that a GEOM class can register to get notified when a provider is destroyed. The probable commit message is

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-03-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 23:50:31 +1030, Matt Thyer wrote: On 26 March 2012 23:55, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:05:59PM +1030, Matt Thyer wrote: On Mar 26, 2012 3:43 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM,

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-02-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 21:00:28 +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: Can you to reproduce issue with below mentioned changes.. In mps.c mps_get_tunables(struct mps_softc *sc) { char tmpstr[80]; /* XXX default to some debugging for now */ sc-mps_debug = MPS_FAULT; Instead of

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-01-25 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 20:47:37 -0800, Dennis Glatting wrote: On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:44 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken

Re: Firewire disk/tape access stopped working after recent CAM commit

2012-01-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 00:03:56 -0600, Richard Todd wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:16:05AM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: If you can, please try the attached patch and see if it has any impact on the problem. There is a bug in that commit in that we shouldn't be invalidating all LUNs

Re: Firewire disk/tape access stopped working after recent CAM commit

2012-01-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 20:52:38 -0600, Richard Todd wrote: Hi. I tried upgrading my amd64 10-CURRENT box to the most recent -CURRENT code and found that the new kernel couldn't find my two disks and tape drive that are on a Firewire bus. All the USB and AHCI-attached hardware still showed

LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-01-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/lsi/mps_lsi.20120120.1.txt I plan to check it in to head next week, and then MFC it into stable/9 a week after that most likely.

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-01-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:53:04 -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here: Just to clarify

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-01-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 23:14:20 -, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:44 PM Subject: LSI supported mps(4) driver available The LSI

Re: ctlstat not building with clang

2012-01-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 14:59:11 -0600, Dan McGregor wrote: Building world with clang now (as of r229997) no longer compiles because ctlstat was imported into the tree. The error is: clang -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/ctlstat/../../sys -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror

Re: CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 21:53:11 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written for Copan

Re: CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-05 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:03:57 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/4/12 8:39 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation

CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-04 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written for Copan Systems under Linux starting in 2003. It has been shipping in Copan (now

CAM Target Layer available

2012-01-04 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections. CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written for Copan Systems under Linux starting in 2003. It has been shipping in Copan (now

Re: SCSI descriptor sense changes, testing needed

2011-10-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
This has been committed to head, and the plan is to get it into stable/9 in time for 9.0. Please let me know if you run into any problems with the changes. Thanks, Ken On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 23:19:14 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: I have attached a new version of the patches

Re: SCSI descriptor sense changes, testing needed

2011-09-30 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 21:46:03 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 21:27:22 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have attached a set of patches against head that implement SCSI descriptor

Re: SCSI descriptor sense changes, testing needed

2011-09-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 21:27:22 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have attached a set of patches against head that implement SCSI descriptor sense support for CAM. Anyway, I'd appreciate any testing and feedback on these changes. As I said

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-22 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: These two are interesting: http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1249/21062011014m.jpg http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/3791/21062011015.jpg It looks like

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-21 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 00:49:34 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: ps alltrace show locks show msgbuf Hopefully that will give us something to start looking at... This would really work a lot better if there is any way

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-21 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 15:46:56 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:01:46AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:02:22AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:15:43PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: On 6/19/11 6:19 PM, Andrey

Re: message buffer scrambling fix

2011-05-31 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:26:50 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On 5/27/11 3:45 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: Hey folks, I have attached some patches to the kernel message buffer code (this affects dmesg(8) output as well as kernel messages that go to the syslog) to address log scrambling

message buffer scrambling fix

2011-05-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
Hey folks, I have attached some patches to the kernel message buffer code (this affects dmesg(8) output as well as kernel messages that go to the syslog) to address log scrambling. This fixes the same issue that 'options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128' fixes for the console. The problem is that you can

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 13:59:35 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in devicestat.h: ... funny

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: i think there are multiple issues with

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:09:00 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: On 11.04.2011 18:43, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: 2) the pass* devices still don't show up under ide/scsi/other. that's ok, but then the src

LSI 6Gb SAS driver committed

2010-09-10 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I sent this out to the -scsi list earlier today. Testers would be appreciated for the 6Gb LSI SAS driver. Please follow up to me or the -scsi list. Thanks, Ken - Forwarded message from Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org - Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:04:38 -0600 From: Kenneth D. Merry k

HEADS UP: CAM error recovery change

2003-10-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I checked in a change to the CAM error recovery code that will hopefully have a positive effect on systems with CDROM drives that were taking a while to probe. Anyway, try this out and let me know if there are any regressions. Thanks, Ken - Forwarded message from Kenneth D. Merry [EMAIL

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without any problems? There is a CD in the drive. cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-6401TA 1001 Removable CD-ROM

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 14:29:38 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:51:50PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-09-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:22:13 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: Hmm. One other thing I'm seeing is that when I configure a 128 bit key with ifconfig or wicontrol (wicontrol shows all 28 characters -- 0x plus 26 hex characters), ifconfig still thinks it is a 104 bit key. This is because

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-09-18 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:43:08 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: I've got a Netgear WAG511 (Atheros 5212-based card) and a Netgear FWAG114 wireless router. I've been trying to get the card and the router talking under FreeBSD. (Both 802.11a and 802.11g work fine under Windows on the same

ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-09-16 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I've got a Netgear WAG511 (Atheros 5212-based card) and a Netgear FWAG114 wireless router. I've been trying to get the card and the router talking under FreeBSD. (Both 802.11a and 802.11g work fine under Windows on the same machine.) I'm using -current from September 15th. Anyway, whenever I

Re: scsi_cd or atapicam crash in current.

2003-09-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:57:22 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: I am seeing a peculiar, possibly timing sensitive, crash that looks like if is probably in either atapicam or scsi_cd. The system is CURRENT as of yesterday morning. The crash happens frequently when nautilus starts up. It does not

Re: wi0: cardbus card activation failed

2003-09-04 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:02:10 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hello, : I have same problem as http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-August/008948.html, : but with other PCMCIA card - new Proxim Orinoco.

Re: make buildworld errors (libcam)

2003-09-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:03:04 -0700, Don Lewis wrote: On 3 Sep, Michael Bretterklieber wrote: Hi, buildworld fails (cvsup some minutes ago): In file included from /usr/src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c:51: /usr/src/sys/sys/taskqueue.h:33:2: #error no user-servicable parts inside

Re: need some debugging help

2003-09-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:52:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kenneth D. Merry writes: Anyway, I got some debugging output, and I've attached dmesg output. Let me know whether anything in there looks suspicious or points to a possible problem. There's

  1   2   3   4   >