Re: Can't update CLang-based system

2011-02-28 Thread Mark Murray
Tim Kientzle writes: I have a FreeBSD-CURRENT AMD64 system here that was last updated at = r215029. I'm trying to update it to r219079, but the build fails in lib/libz when = it tries to compile gvmat64.S. It looks like the Makefile here has a = workaround for clang on AMD64, but it

Re: Setting up IPv6 in /etc/rc.conf

2010-10-16 Thread Mark Murray
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes: On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Mark Murray wrote: Alexey Shuvaev writes: gifconfig_gif0_ipv6=2001:::::2 2001:::::1 prefixlen 128 I suppose you should prefix it with inet6 keyword. There are 2 examples

Setting up IPv6 in /etc/rc.conf

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Murray
Hi IPv6 gurus: what are the CURRENT /etc/rc.conf incantations to do the following (which works): $ ifconfig gif0 create $ ifconfig gif0 tunnel 192.168.0.2 11.22.33.44 $ ifconfig gif0 inet6 2001:::::2 2001:::::1 prefixlen 128 $ route -n add -inet6 default

Re: Setting up IPv6 in /etc/rc.conf

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Murray
Alexey Shuvaev writes: gifconfig_gif0_ipv6=2001:::::2 2001:::::1 prefixlen 128 I suppose you should prefix it with inet6 keyword. There are 2 examples in rc.conf (search for Sample IPv6). Ah! It didn't occur to me

[no subject]

2003-12-01 Thread Mark Murray
Hi You haven't responded to this. I'm very interested in these patches, please. M --- Forwarded Message Date:Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:51:19 + From:Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rtld + static linking

Re: rtld + static linking

2003-11-27 Thread Mark Murray
to the mailing list. In actuality, I only ever posted portions of my own patches, since they also required compiler and linker changes. Could you please post your patches in their entirety? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: rtld + static linking

2003-11-26 Thread Mark Murray
and/or something? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Operating system advocacy (Was: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-25 Thread Mark Murray
-project politics are somewhat rough, and I'm trying to cool things down!) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

The matcd(4) driver needs a maintainer

2003-11-02 Thread Mark Murray
Hi The matcd(4) driver needs an active maintainer. Do we have any volunteers? Without active maintenance/use, the driver will rot, die and be removed from the tree. Speak up now! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: Help saving my system

2003-10-20 Thread Mark Murray
Scott M. Likens writes: Ah, such a strong comment from such a strong member. I would have thought you were to high to stoop that low? But I guess it's good to be flamed for being honest? is it not? Please don't encourage flames and flamers by responding to them. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap

Re: Help saving my system

2003-10-18 Thread Mark Murray
in rather fine (and not too long) detail, you are pretty much on your own. Sorry! For this, the questions@ and newbies@ lists are better than [EMAIL PROTECTED] M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: AES is broken.

2003-10-17 Thread Mark Murray
Poul-Henning Kamp writes: For stuff like AES we should _really_ have a standalone regression test. Anyone out there willing to make one from the official AES test-vectors from NIST ? Yeah. I can do this. Gimme a day or three. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-17 Thread Mark Murray
that make release uses. This way, the files are already separated out into directory structures, and it may be easier to build complex pkg-plist's with find(1). ALSO, it may be easier to make more fine-grained packages (DISTRIBUTION=foo) with this. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point

2003-09-04 Thread Mark Murray
happens on two different computers with nearly similar custom kernel configuration Could you tell me, what's causing the problem ? * If needed I can submit my kernel configuration * When it hangs, please press ctrl-T, and report back the status line that you get in response. Thanks! M -- Mark

Re: Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point

2003-09-04 Thread Mark Murray
a fix. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Current panic in pmap/VM

2003-08-20 Thread Mark Murray
if anyone has ideas. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current panic in pmap/VM

2003-08-20 Thread Mark Murray
further. Does this work, or will I be wasting effort? (Getting that cable in is going to be a _pain_). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe

Re: HEADSUP: pca driver being retired.

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Murray
who use this driver to either see if it can be effectively newbussed or turned into a port or both? I see considerable scope for an infrastructure that would allow drivers to be ports. _Easily_. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
, I presume? The SRM console is the prompt where you type boot, right? (Typing from work - will do at home later). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
Wilko Bulte writes: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Wilko Bulte writes: Sounds like an SRM problem or EISA configuration problem. Normaly the bus and then system board should be probed at this point. We never used EISA on alpha before - EISA bridge

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
command line used to kick off the build would be useful too. Thanks! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
connect on a serial console, but ECU assumes a VT220, and the output is unreadable. Any suggestions? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-25 Thread Mark Murray
= 7 machine check while in PAL mode PC = 18100 Any idea what gives? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-25 Thread Mark Murray
(no clock). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-25 Thread Mark Murray
. Check the archives. Well, that's left me hosed :-(. I looked through current@ and alpha@ (briefly) and saw nothing obvious. What should I be looking for? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: make release broken [FIX]

2003-07-23 Thread Mark Murray
- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Hi8lUkv4P6juNwoRArAKAJ0QpXpQ9YPuG5gXUo/5p+uia83CiACfTkYW Myhb+SttdXFnNahueIHJ7Us= =LyZK -END PGP SIGNATURE- --A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G-- -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: make release broken [FIX]

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Murray
-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/HWl5Ukv4P6juNwoRAgnvAJ96n/MFl2mtKOPU4v6H2/7xEQjQbQCfWKZO l3wwJ/OZmt0wCqmhWkpvMGg= =9BF1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6-- -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Mark Murray
machine perhaps? My home box is doing it too. as(1) blowing up randomly. No usable core dumps. :-(. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: telnet build fails without openssl...

2003-07-21 Thread Mark Murray
Anti writes: buildworld fails at telnet if you build with NOCRYPT and NO_OPENSSL -- telnet stuff is looking for NO_CRYPTO to disable this, which isn't documented anywhere... Thanks! This should be fixed now. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

2003-07-15 Thread Mark Murray
, and the machine is not loaded. The heaviest process is spamassassin. There isn't even X running on the box. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: Making a disk bootable...

2003-07-14 Thread Mark Murray
the geomtery is. (blat the boot partitions first, if you can). Then, when you fdisk, make damn sure that the probed geometry is used. After that, you shouldn't have probelms. If that fixes your problem, please report it in detail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so we can get a more permanent fix. M -- Mark

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-06 Thread Mark Murray
What a weekend. Frigging _everything_ was a messup. M. Warner Losh writes: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh writes: : Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was : broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-06 Thread Mark Murray
possible that yours is a slightly different problem, so I'd be interested to hear what you are doing exacly so that I could try and repeat it. Hi. Reverting pccbb.c to 1.75 fixed this for me. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-04 Thread Mark Murray
was to be sure? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-04 Thread Mark Murray
M. Warner Losh writes: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh writes: : Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was : broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time : ago, my change

3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-03 Thread Mark Murray
recent diffs to if_ep.c it doesn't fix anything, so I'm suspecting pccardd code. Any similar observations? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: ACPI stuff to make Libretto 110CT work

2003-06-25 Thread Mark Murray
John Baldwin writes: On 24-Jun-2003 Mark Murray wrote: Hi You (?) gave me these patches at least 6 months ago, and they've been working for my Libretto ever since then. Is it OK if I commit them? No, not quite yet. Those are rather hackish and I didn't develop them, one

Re: where is rogue?

2003-06-24 Thread Mark Murray
Kris Kennaway writes: Oops. Fix coming later today. Any progress on this? Yes. I'll commit as soon as I upload the dist tarball. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: where is rogue?

2003-06-24 Thread Mark Murray
a copy of the repository with it. Anyone may fix this port, I'm not holding a lock. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

ACPI stuff to make Libretto 110CT work

2003-06-24 Thread Mark Murray
Hi You (?) gave me these patches at least 6 months ago, and they've been working for my Libretto ever since then. Is it OK if I commit them? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH Index: dev/acpica/acpi.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs

Re: Email accounts on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-20 Thread Mark Murray
that, depending on what it is you want to do _exactly_. The above will work in certain circumstances, but simple testing will tell you that. What we can't tell is whether you need a Land Rover or a Bulldozer. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL

Re: Email accounts on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-20 Thread Mark Murray
, _experiment_ with what you have, and look for real-life holes in your setup. Try to think like the attacker you are trying to thwart. Attack yourself. Get paranoid. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: where is rogue?

2003-06-18 Thread Mark Murray
Kris Kennaway writes: I installed freebsd-games, and it has most of the games I remember, but n= ot rogue. Well, hrumph, it's supposed to be in that port. Mark, it looks like rogue wasn't added for some reason. Oops. Fix coming later today. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

CTM - any users left?

2003-06-16 Thread Mark Murray
Hi all Last time I looked, we had _very_ few CTM users. Is there any reason that the CTM stuff should not be a port? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: HEADS UP: rpc.yppasswdd working again

2003-06-15 Thread Mark Murray
this not create a vulnerability? Example: Bad Guy sets up a personal workstation with himself as root and steals an IP address from the machine he just switched off. Now he can change passwords on the server at will. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: HEADS UP: rpc.yppasswdd working again

2003-06-15 Thread Mark Murray
Martin Blapp writes: maps using ypchpass(1). Again, this only applies to the super-user on the NIS master server: none of these special functions can be performed over the network. I am happy! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Trolling and forge subscribes.

2003-06-02 Thread Mark Murray
is to ignore it. I'm dealing with the problem. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: `make buildworld' failed

2003-03-19 Thread Mark Murray
of this stuff (for better or worse). No. :-). If you use CURRENT, stay current. We can't prevent _every_ foot-shoot. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: `make buildworld' failed

2003-03-18 Thread Mark Murray
for stuff that we need to revisit. For you, the easiest way to jump is to remove MAKE_KERBEROS4 from /etc/make.conf. Yes. You should not be using that; it is well broken now. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

HEADS UP! KerberosIV is being retired!

2003-03-07 Thread Mark Murray
live Kerberos 5 !! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Murray
Terry Lambert writes: Mark Murray wrote: Only if it kills this _really_ dumb debate. In time, it will no longer compile, and then the situation will be the same as just punting to the Attic without the fix. Only if some idiot breaks the API contract again. Whatever happened to you

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Murray
is recalculated fully, instead? Terry, you sound rather foolish when you argue like this. This is semantic tomfoolery and off topic. End of thread. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Murray
-- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Murray
if it kills this _really_ dumb debate. In time, it will no longer compile, and then the situation will be the same as just punting to the Attic without the fix. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Murray
Terry Lambert writes: Mark Murray wrote: Will it be runnable (as in tested), rather than a compile-only fix? Is tested a requirement fo code to be committed or to have it stay in the tree? Both. Be careful of your answer, unless you are willing to remove all code that does not meet

Re: PATCH: type errors in src-tree

2003-03-02 Thread Mark Murray
can't do that on a void *, at least not in ANSI C. I think gcc lets you do it, but it's an extension. As I have discovered. I specifically looked for this, and my misreading of the spec is now clear. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: PATCH: type errors in src-tree

2003-03-02 Thread Mark Murray
. There are a few places where caddr_t is assumed to point to char. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: No more new majors, and help loose the old ones...

2003-02-27 Thread Mark Murray
. Please help remove entries in sys/conf/majors for which there exists no software, and convert drivers to use MAJOR_AUTO instead of using static major numbers. Thanks in advance! What is a good driver to crib this from? I'll do /dev/(null|zero|random). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: OpenSSL should define OPENSSL_THREADS?

2003-02-26 Thread Mark Murray
build ... let's see if this is intentional or not. [cc'd] Not intentional. If adding it breaks nothing, go ahead. I have Panic City right now on my devboxes, so I'm working on fixing that. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: OPIE breakage: backout patch for review

2003-02-16 Thread Mark Murray
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED! Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster! POLA. We don't want to burn our user/admins. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send

Re: OPIE breakage: backout patch for review

2003-02-16 Thread Mark Murray
see, I am specific. Does the -as-localhost-alias break other PAM modules? In what way does localhost or NULL break OPIE? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: OPIE breakage: backout patch for review

2003-02-16 Thread Mark Murray
/opieaccess (i.e. without your line) are affected too! Local logins becomes mysteriosly disabled for their users. With a suitable HEADS UP! and appropriate changes to the documentation, might is be possible to move _all_ policy control into PAM, instead of having it split between OPIE and PAM? M -- Mark

Re: OPIE breakage: backout patch for review

2003-02-16 Thread Mark Murray
David O'Brien writes: On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:11:49PM +, Mark Murray wrote: In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation is a bug

Re: OPIE breakage: backout patch for review

2003-02-16 Thread Mark Murray
is OPIEised and not PAMised, we need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation is a bug in its own right. If they are ports, they need to fall in with FreeBSD/sysadmin policy. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Re: Final fix for 0 problem (was Re: rand() is broken)

2003-02-03 Thread Mark Murray
-- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Final fix for 0 problem (was Re: rand() is broken)

2003-02-03 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:55:42 +, Mark Murray wrote: How do you _know_ that your newly chosen magic number isn't going to cause some kind of recurring (and too-short) sequence of numbers? I run simple test for it, it is not too short. simple test? How

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
-- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
a hoot if that is actually provided trough use of RC4 or not. I see no reason why the implementation could be changed if the contract is maintained. Good point. We can re-implement random() internally with arc4rand(). Objections? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
for all bits. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
complex. RC4 is fast. RC4 is simple. Any objections? :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: Objections? We can't, simple because sequence must be repeated for the same seed across the calls. RC4 is repeatable. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 17:30:48 +, Mark Murray wrote: Why not? Arc4 is a) deterministic and b) good for all bits. If you mean arc4random() function - not, because it use true randomness, if you mean RC4 algorithm, probably yes, but we should compare its

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Murray wr ites: We have most of this, and RC4 can deliver. RC4's licence is fine. Call it ArCFour and there is no problem. The code is small, fast and repeatable, and meets conditions 1-4 above. There are some concerns about

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
that PHK remembered the old discussion!] So did I! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
for the simulation guys! Are you a Verilog guy ar a VRML guy? Something else maybe? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
David Malone writes: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:08:47PM +, Mark Murray wrote: RC4 is _utterly_ repeatable, given a particular seed/key. I presume it also produces reasonably uniform output for most seeds too. Yes. Modulo the requirement to burn a bit of output after a reseed

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
change (as they will). The two are related topics. Consider the (joking reference to) elephant-free biology. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
of compatibility is to not break interfaces unless there is a significant benefit. We are not proposing interface breaks. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Bakul Shah writes: Note that it is rand() that is broken, not random() as can be seen by modifying Kris Kennaways' test so I don't see why Mark Murray was talking about changing it in the first place. rand(3) says: STANDARDS The rand() and srand() functions conform to ISO/IEC 9899:1990

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
also does a pretty good job on the whole. Reasonable is an opinion. It is not shared by me. :-) Irix was well known for its bugs. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
-implement random() internally with arc4rand(). Quote it in context, please. That was random(9). KERNEL random(). However, the argument applies equally well to rand(3) and random(3). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
understand your words. I disagree with them. Now the question is whether perl uses system provided random() or rand() or its own since perl is used extensively in ASIC verification. Different question. Ask the perl developers. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 21:23:43 +, Mark Murray wrote: That was random(9). KERNEL random(). KERNEL random() can be easily implemented (better - replaced) with arc4random(), there is no objections. But... 1) Implementing random(3) with RC4 is not needed

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 22:19:33 +, Mark Murray wrote: 1) Implementing random(3) with RC4 is not needed, its algorithm is already equal or better. Rubbish. :-) RC4's internal state is 256 bytes. In theory, its cycle-of-repetition is 2^(8*256) bits

Re: rand() is broken

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Murray
Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 22:35:54 +, Mark Murray wrote: I stand (somewhat) corrected. The random() code is _nasty_ complexity-wise. Its not obvious how it works. RC4 is 10-20 lines and clean with no magic numbers. That's why randomness tests

Style fixups for proc.h

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Murray
Hi OK to commit the style fixups below? (They just make sure that all function prototypes have all arguments named, and that all names are protected). int foo(int bar); becomes int foo(int _bar); M Index: proc.h === RCS file:

Re: Style fixups for proc.h

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Murray
this on all the other files? There is a move to fix lint(1) warnings. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Style fixups for proc.h

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Murray
. Because this doesn't always help, or if it did, the diffs are often much bigger and to many more files. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Style fixups for proc.h

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Murray
Why not fix the compiler lint instead of cluttering up declarations? Can we at least get proc.h to have a consistent style of function parameter usage? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: Style fixups for proc.h

2003-02-01 Thread Mark Murray
figure out and remove whatever broken compiler option is generating the warning in the first place. Then can we just get the proc.h prototypes into a (any) consistent style? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: Problem during alpha cross-building

2003-01-26 Thread Mark Murray
. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Problem during alpha cross-building

2003-01-24 Thread Mark Murray
): undefined reference to `be64toh' exec_elf64.o(.text+0x5e6): undefined reference to `be64toh' exec_elf64.o(.text+0x639): more undefined references to `be64toh' follow *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/asami/portbuild/alpha/5/src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchide. *** Error code 1 M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Mark Murray
to deprecate public interfaces for a period of time before removing them. Hiten's change doesn't do that either. Is David O'Brien's commit sufficient to fix this? it looks to me like it provides a good deprecation route (BOTH symbols). M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: i386 boot failure

2003-01-17 Thread Mark Murray
the random device? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Murray
Agreed. It really should be an int * like it used to be. But it's up to Mark Murray to fix it since it was his commit that changed it to a size_t in the first place. I'm not religiously attached to this. If you want to change it before I get to it, go ahead. M -- Mark Murray

Re: sio and ed woes

2002-12-18 Thread Mark Murray
was hinted at in the GENERIC/80386 thread)? Sort of. ISA is on its way out and ACPI/PnP is taking over. You sometimes need to go to great lengths to prevent devices from being found. The abomination called ISA/PnP is sometimes a nuisance. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-14 Thread Mark Murray
have it in the default install. :-) M -- Mark Murray Beware! I'm umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread Mark Murray
changes if I pull out the cable (except the lights go out). If I insert the card after boot, I get an identical (non-)result, with the exception that the MAC address is ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, and if I remove/insert more than about three times, the machine will hard-hang (only way out is reset). M -- Mark

Re: Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread Mark Murray
Yup. Known problem with some cards. How do I fix? M -- Mark Murray Beware! I'm umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread Mark Murray
to bin this card and buy something that is actually supported? If so, what cardbus 100Mb ethernet card has the best chance of sustained support? M -- Mark Murray Beware! I'm umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >