Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)

2014-04-24 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 04/24/14 17:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called LibreSSL. As OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of OpenSSL, I'd like to hear what the plans are in

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-11-05 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 11/05/13 12:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote: This is not the fix, it is rather a masking for a bug. Right now, I am even more sure that the issue is in vbox. And still, anybody able to get the problem on amd64 guest ? I have run numerous versions of 10 (64bit) inside VirtualBox without

Cannot compile many ports because of missing -lsupc++ and -lstdc++

2013-10-01 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hello, I am having trouble compiling many ports which fail with one of the following errors. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsupc++ I understand 10 has a new c++ library, but how can I get ports to build with this? This is quite frustrating. I am using a fresh

Re: Cannot compile many ports because of missing -lsupc++ and -lstdc++

2013-10-01 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 10/01/13 18:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:51:39PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Hello, I am having trouble compiling many ports which fail with one of the following errors. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsupc++ I understand 10 has

Re: Cant build 32bit libraries

2013-09-05 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 09/05/13 09:56, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 5:27:24 pm Mike Jakubik wrote: Hello, I'm trying to install 32 libraries or a resent snapshot, but i get this error. /usr/src # make build32 I'm not sure that is supposed to work standalone. Perhaps try doing a make

Cant build 32bit libraries

2013-09-04 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hello, I'm trying to install 32 libraries or a resent snapshot, but i get this error. /usr/src # make build32 ... === kerberos5/liblibheimipcc (installincludes) === kerberos5/liblibheimipcs (installincludes) cd /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/lib; MACHINE=i386 MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE_CPU=i686 mmx

Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?

2010-06-10 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following: -1 unless mergemaster is replaced. Have you tried etcupdate? etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a different way. While one is intended to be more

Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?

2010-06-10 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 6/10/2010 4:47 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote: -1 Also. How does this differ from a mergemaster -iFU ? That's pretty much as automated as it can get. I find the ability to do 'etcupdate diff' to quickly get an overview of which changes I have made to a standard installation very

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 5/31/2010 3:52 AM, Roman Divacky wrote: Clang can compile all of FreeBSD on i386/amd64 including world and booting kernel. Other architectures that are close to working are MIPS, PowerPC and ARM. We have a branch (clangbsd-import) that just includes clang/LLVM sources and the build

Re: HEADS UP: COMPAT_IA32 renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32

2010-03-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations including this option must be modified

RE: Release Engineering Status Report

2003-09-16 Thread Mike Jakubik
Apparently, yes. http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/1327248.shtml?tid=126tid=172 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dag-Erling Smørgrav Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:54 AM To: David Rhodus Cc: Maxim Konovalov; Scott Long;

RE: make buildworld b0rked (libkrb5)

2003-09-03 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Bretterklieber Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: make buildworld b0rked (libkrb5) Hi, make buildworld (cvsup some minutes ago) fails: during linking

buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Jakubik
I have re cvsuped 2 days later (Fri Aug 29 10:19:29 EDT 2003) and I am still getting the same error, can anyone shed some light here? Thanks. === lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../.. /../contrib/openpam/include

RE: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Jakubik
Why should I have to turn off all my optimization options when building world? This shouldn't be like that. 4.x always compiled fine with -O2 and CPU options. -Original Message- From: Wesley Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:26 AM To: Mike Jakubik

RE: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:36 AM To: Mike Jakubik Cc: Current Subject: Re: buildworld failure On (2003/08/29 11:30), Mike Jakubik wrote: Why should I have to turn off all my

RE: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:05 PM To: Robert Watson Cc: Mike Jakubik; Current Subject: Re: buildworld failure On (2003/08/29 11:48), Robert Watson wrote: The differences here seem

RE: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:49 AM To: Mike Jakubik Cc: Current Subject: Re: buildworld failure On (2003/08/29 11:41), Mike Jakubik wrote: Yes, I can see that its not working

Failure making buildworld (cvsup at Thu Aug 28 10:34:49 EDT 2003)

2003-08-28 Thread Mike Jakubik
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../.. /../contrib/openpam/include -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../lib pam -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes - Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith

stray irq's in systat

2003-08-26 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hi, When running 'systat -vmstat 1' on FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Mon Aug 25 14:54:14 EDT 2003, the interrupts section shows irq's 0 and 6 as stray. I remember this would happen on 4.x when I took out lpt drivers from the kernel, and didn't disable lpt in the bios. This however is not the

RE: HTT on current

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: Sang Woo Shim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 1:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTT on current On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:23:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well i've enabled all SMP

RE: HTT on current

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Jakubik
Its seems to be working for me ok with the sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus variable set to 0. (I wonder why its not by default) # sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus=0 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 2 - 0 # uname -a FreeBSD newns.trigger.net 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Fri Aug 22 19:07:26 EDT 2003

HTT on current

2003-08-22 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hi, I have a HTT capabale PCU on an Intel MB with the 875P chipset. I have enabled HTT in the BIOS and compiled my kernel with the required SMP options, however i dont think the system is really running in SMP mode. Top does not display CPU numbers. Here is my dmesg: --- FreeBSD

RE: HTT on current

2003-08-22 Thread Mike Jakubik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Culver Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:33 PM To: Mike Jakubik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTT on current Hi, I have a HTT capabale PCU on an Intel MB with the 875P chipset. I have enabled

RE: who am i

2003-07-04 Thread Mike Jakubik
I don't think this is a problem with su. The same occurs when running login in a shell, then logging out. I've seen this bug in FreeBSD since early 4.x, I guess I just never bothered to mention it, thinking someone would notice and fix it. It has certainly scared me a few times, it would be nice