Re: IPFW2 verrevpath issue (IPv4 TCP, fresh kernel)

2003-11-26 Thread Sean Chittenden
Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current 5.2-BETA kernel? You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this. ^^^ not Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc Ack! If ever there was a missing word to change the meaning of an

Re: IPFW2 verrevpath issue (IPv4 TCP, fresh kernel)

2003-11-26 Thread Sam Leffler
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:40 pm, Sean Chittenden wrote: Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current 5.2-BETA kernel? You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this. ^^^ not Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc

IPFW2 verrevpath issue (IPv4 TCP, fresh kernel)

2003-11-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Hi, I seem to have difficulties with verrevpath in IPFW2 (current kernel, cvsupped a few hours ago) which APPEARS to not match - or am I too whatever to configure ipfw2 properly? Excerpt from ipfw show: | 0010038 3216 allow ip from any to any via lo0 | 00200 0 0 deny ip from any

Re: IPFW2 verrevpath issue (IPv4 TCP, fresh kernel)

2003-11-25 Thread Sean Chittenden
Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current 5.2-BETA kernel? You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this. Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc -- Sean Chittenden ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: IPFW2 verrevpath issue (IPv4 TCP, fresh kernel)

2003-11-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote: Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current 5.2-BETA kernel? You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this. Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc Sort of. I do have three xl(4) NICs in my system.