Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-26 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do with it is make a better PAM out of it?

NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do with it is make a better PAM out of it? The important thing is that NSS allows to plug modules such as LDAP or

Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't. Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but some won't let it go...

Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't. Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but