Re: lock order reversal

2018-02-26 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:42:14 +0200 "Andriy Gapon" <a...@freebsd.org> said On 26/02/2018 07:18, Jon Brawn wrote: > Wotcha! > > So, I’ve been using FreeBSD 12-CURRENT at various svn releases for a while > now, and I get quite a few “lock order reversal” dumps. The

Re: lock order reversal

2018-02-25 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 26/02/2018 07:18, Jon Brawn wrote: > Wotcha! > > So, I’ve been using FreeBSD 12-CURRENT at various svn releases for a while > now, and I get quite a few “lock order reversal” dumps. The one I’ve got on > my screen at the moment is for ufs / bufwait / ufs: > > root@brax:

lock order reversal

2018-02-25 Thread Jon Brawn
Wotcha! So, I’ve been using FreeBSD 12-CURRENT at various svn releases for a while now, and I get quite a few “lock order reversal” dumps. The one I’ve got on my screen at the moment is for ufs / bufwait / ufs: root@brax:/usr/src/stand # lock order reversal: 1st 0xfd0003ec17e8 ufs (ufs

lock order reversal another, repeatable...

2017-03-25 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
Mar 24 14:25:16 kernel: lock order reversal: Mar 24 14:25:16 kernel: 1st 0xc09cf6dc ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1277 Mar 24 14:25:16 kernel: 2nd 0xc0100a30 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:1908 Mar 24 14:25:16 kernel: stack backtrace: Mar 24 14:25:16 kernel

Re: Lock order reversal [ newbie ] report [2nd one> more of ]

2017-02-25 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:06:32 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > Thank you for your enthusiasm in reporting these. > Unfortunately, it is very likely that these two are "well-known" and > believed to be harmless, so you have not discovered something > terribly

Re: Lock order reversal [ newbie ] report [2nd one]

2017-02-22 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Jeffrey, Thank you for your enthusiasm in reporting these. Unfortunately, it is very likely that these two are "well-known" and believed to be harmless, so you have not discovered something terribly exciting. An old and no-longer particularly maintained listing of these and other LORs is at:

Re: Lock order reversal [ newbie ] report [2nd one]

2017-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
This one at boot: #0 to #10 bufwait /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3500 dirhash /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:201 r313487 12.0-CURRENT Feb 13 2017 1200020 FWIW both the above and the below reports... On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:37:21 -0800 (PST), "Jeffrey Bouquet"

Lock order reversal [ newbie ] report

2017-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
#0 #16 follow: jotted down : 1. ufs /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3364 2. bufwait /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:280 3. ufs /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2600 [ took roxterm out of the xinitrc, system stable seems more than yesterday... too early to tell, which is/was a 2nd issue... put

RE: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-09 Thread Anindya Mukherjee
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0? On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:31:39AM +, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your reply, and yes, I did notice #238. I should say at this point > that I'm a newbie when it comes to kernel

Re: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-09 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:31:39AM +, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your reply, and yes, I did notice #238. I should say at this point > that I'm a newbie when it comes to kernel code and am trying to learn about > it (hence current). Understood. It's good that you are

RE: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-08 Thread Anindya Mukherjee
From: Benjamin Kaduk [ka...@mit.edu] Sent: January 8, 2017 4:47 PM To: Anindya Mukherjee Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0? On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:32:28AM +, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > Hi, I'm running 12.0-current and noticed a LOR mess

Re: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
t; root@triskelion:~ # uname -a > FreeBSD triskelion 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r311461: Thu Jan 5 > 22:46:38 UTC 2017 > r...@releng3.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > root@triskelion:~ # freebsd-version > 12.0-CURRENT > > > WIT

New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-08 Thread Anindya Mukherjee
: Thu Jan 5 22:46:38 UTC 2017 r...@releng3.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@triskelion:~ # freebsd-version 12.0-CURRENT WITNESS report: lock order reversal: 1st 0xf8002e8049a0 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2598 2nd 0xfe01e7ce9b40 bufwait (bufwait

Re: Lock order reversal errors during boot

2016-05-20 Thread mokhi
eu> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>>> I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT - >>>> r298793. A sample error: >>>> >>>> lock order reversal: >>>> 1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/s

Re: Lock order reversal errors during boot

2016-05-20 Thread Will Brokenbourgh
On 05/16/16 00:44, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 07:44 , Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote: Hi! I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT - r298793. A sample error: lock order reversal: 1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_

Re: Lock order reversal errors during boot

2016-05-16 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
> On 15 May 2016, at 07:44 , Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT - >> r298793. A sample error: >> >> lock order reversal: >> 1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (

Re: Lock order reversal errors during boot

2016-05-15 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT - > r298793. A sample error: > > lock order reversal: > 1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2498 > 2nd 0xfe01ca539400 bufwait (bufwait) @ > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ff

Lock order reversal errors during boot

2016-05-14 Thread Will Brokenbourgh
Greetings, My first post here so please be gentle. I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT - r298793. A sample error: lock order reversal: 1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2498 2nd 0xfe01ca539400 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src

Re: Lock order reversal in CURRENT

2016-02-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Eax Melanhovich wrote: > Hello. > > Yesterday I built a kernel and world using master branch (6a8922d3) of > FreeBSD GitHub repository (a mirror of SVN as I understand?). Today I > got a "lock order reversal" report: > > http://i.imgu

Lock order reversal in CURRENT

2016-02-24 Thread Eax Melanhovich
Hello. Yesterday I built a kernel and world using master branch (6a8922d3) of FreeBSD GitHub repository (a mirror of SVN as I understand?). Today I got a "lock order reversal" report: http://i.imgur.com/jDZ4A3O.png According to this FAQ it could be a sign of a deadlock: https://www.f

ufs/devfs lock order reversal on poweroff

2015-02-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi On r278909 (and probably earlier) I get the following when I run poweroff (retyped from a video of it I had to record, since it disappears very quickly): Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4 1 0 0 done All buffers synced. lock order reversal: 1st 0xf80014d4d060 ufs (ufs) 0 /usr/src/sys

Re: ufs/devfs lock order reversal on poweroff

2015-02-18 Thread NGie Cooper
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com wrote: Hi On r278909 (and probably earlier) I get the following when I run poweroff (retyped from a video of it I had to record, since it disappears very quickly): Hi Damjan, This is a known LOR. Thanks!

Re: UFS lock order reversal stack trace with r264677 on i386

2014-04-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, R. Tyler Croy wrote: I've noticed this as of late on my i386 -CURRENT Thinkpad T43 when I perform some file operations, but an exact reproduction case I've not yet stumbled upon: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: lock order reversal: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: 1st

UFS lock order reversal stack trace with r264677 on i386

2014-04-19 Thread R. Tyler Croy
I've noticed this as of late on my i386 -CURRENT Thinkpad T43 when I perform some file operations, but an exact reproduction case I've not yet stumbled upon: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: lock order reversal: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: 1st 0xc5832358 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/home/tyler

10-CURRENT - LOR (lock order reversal)

2013-09-18 Thread jb
Hi, these represent machine lockups, if not false positives. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182139cat= jb ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail

Witness message about lock order reversal on 10 (head)

2013-08-19 Thread Yuri
I got these messages on 10 head, rev.254235, during 'filesystem full' condition. Yuri = log = lock order reversal: 1st 0xff80f7432470 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3054 2nd 0xfe00075b5600 dirhash (dirhash) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:284 KDB: stack

Re: Witness message about lock order reversal on 10 (head)

2013-08-19 Thread Dan Mack
WITNESS. Thanks, -- Davide On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Yuri wrote: I got these messages on 10 head, rev.254235, during 'filesystem full' condition. Yuri = log = lock order reversal: 1st 0xff80f7432470 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3054 2nd 0xfe00075b5600 dirhash

lock order reversal in r252098

2013-06-24 Thread Steven Kreuzer
Hello- I am running 10.0-CURRENT #0 r252098 on a beaglebone and I am getting the occasional LOR when reading/writing in an nfs mount lock order reversal: 1st 0xc1c0a150 newnfs (newnfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:4064 2nd 0xc6a5e278 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2311

Re: lock order reversal in sys/kern/vfs_mount.c

2012-06-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
John Baldwin wrote on 08.06.2012 18:45: On Friday, June 08, 2012 4:21:34 am Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 08.06.2012 12:10: Good day, After updating to yesterdays -current, I got this on boot: lock order reversal: 1st 0xfe0007b04c38 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern

lock order reversal in sys/kern/vfs_mount.c

2012-06-08 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Good day, After updating to yesterdays -current, I got this on boot: lock order reversal: 1st 0xfe0007b04c38 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1254 2nd 0xfe0007ed9478 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2158 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper

Re: lock order reversal in sys/kern/vfs_mount.c

2012-06-08 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 08.06.2012 12:10: Good day, After updating to yesterdays -current, I got this on boot: lock order reversal: 1st 0xfe0007b04c38 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1254 2nd 0xfe0007ed9478 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2158 KDB: stack

Re: lock order reversal in sys/kern/vfs_mount.c

2012-06-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, June 08, 2012 4:21:34 am Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 08.06.2012 12:10: Good day, After updating to yesterdays -current, I got this on boot: lock order reversal: 1st 0xfe0007b04c38 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1254 2nd

Re: lock order reversal in sys/kern/vfs_mount.c

2012-06-08 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 08.06.2012 10:10, schrieb Ruslan Mahmatkhanov: Good day, After updating to yesterdays -current, I got this on boot: lock order reversal: 1st 0xfe0007b04c38 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1254 2nd 0xfe0007ed9478 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2158 KDB

Re: 9.0-BETA3 lock order reversal in mount_smbfs

2011-10-09 Thread Mikolaj Golub
BF freebsd9b3# mount_smbfs -I smbhost -U xxx -W domain //smbhost/xxx /mnt BF Password: BF mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = No such file or directory BF and displays the following kernel messages: BF smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 BF lock order reversal: BF 1st

9.0-BETA 3 lock order reversal

2011-10-08 Thread Roar Pettersen
Hello ! After upgrading my system from 8.2 to 9.0-BETA3 I now see this error message during boot : lock order reversal: 1st 0xc536e8d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2134 2nd 0xde0077b4 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:260 3rd 0xc7b088d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys

9.0-BETA 3 lock order reversal

2011-10-08 Thread Roar Pettersen
Hello ! Just did a new build of world kernel, and the error message have changed a bit : lock order reversal: 1st 0xddf0c4cc bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2658 2nd 0xc4996200 dirhash (dirhash) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:284 KDB: stack backtrace

Re: 9.0-BETA 3 lock order reversal

2011-10-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Roar Pettersen wrote: Hello ! Just did a new build of world kernel, and the error message have changed a bit : lock order reversal: 1st 0xddf0c4cc bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2658 2nd 0xc4996200 dirhash (dirhash) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c

9.0-BETA3 lock order reversal in mount_smbfs

2011-10-05 Thread Bob Finch
/mnt Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = No such file or directory and displays the following kernel messages: smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 lock order reversal: 1st 0xc2ef4608 smb_vc (smb_vc) @ /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs/../../netsmb/smb_conn.c:325 2nd

lock order reversal

2011-09-06 Thread Vadim Denisov
I install current on last week I have some messages in dmesg -a: lock order reversal: 1st 0xc81ba278 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:425 2nd 0xe0f566d0 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2658 3rd 0xc7d89168 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:546 KDB

Re: lock order reversal

2011-09-06 Thread K. Macy
on last week I have some messages in dmesg -a: lock order reversal:  1st 0xc81ba278 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:425  2nd 0xe0f566d0 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2658  3rd 0xc7d89168 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:546 KDB: stack backtrace

Re: lock order reversal

2011-09-06 Thread Вадим Денисов
Denisov m...@vadimdenisov.ru wrote: I install current on last week I have some messages in dmesg -a: lock order reversal: 1st 0xc81ba278 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:425 2nd 0xe0f566d0 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2658 3rd 0xc7d89168 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys

Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal message . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights

Re: Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal . The mount LOR is well known. The duplicate lock held WITNESS warning with em(4) might be of interest though. Thanks

Re: Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper: On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal . The mount LOR is well known. I see that this is the standard response to lot's of LOR reports

Re: Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Attilio Rao
2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrand e...@cederstrand.dk: Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper: On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .    The mount LOR is well known. I see

Re: Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Julian Elischer
On 12/7/10 3:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: 2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrande...@cederstrand.dk: Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper: On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturkm.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal . The mount LOR

Re: Lock order reversal .

2010-12-07 Thread Matthew Fleming
: A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .    The mount LOR is well known. I see that this is the standard response to lot's of LOR reports. It seems to be one of the most-reported errors on CURRENT (and it's certainly a loud one), but I think a lot of people waste time

lock order reversal bufwait/dirhash

2010-06-09 Thread Bernd Walter
Got this during installworld (source on NFS, destination UFS on CF-card) Source is current checked out yesterday. lock order reversal: 1st 0xc28b85b4 bufwait (bufwait) @ /data/builder/c13-2010-06-07/head/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2575 2nd 0xc343f000 dirhash (dirhash) @ /data/builder/c13-2010-06-07

Re: lock order reversal bufwait/dirhash

2010-06-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:51 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: Got this during installworld (source on NFS, destination UFS on CF-card) Source is current checked out yesterday. lock order reversal: 1st 0xc28b85b4 bufwait (bufwait) @ /data/builder/c13-2010-06-07/head/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2575 2nd

Re: lock order reversal bufwait/dirhash

2010-06-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 3:51:52 am Bernd Walter wrote: Got this during installworld (source on NFS, destination UFS on CF-card) Source is current checked out yesterday. lock order reversal: 1st 0xc28b85b4 bufwait (bufwait) @ /data/builder/c13-2010-06-07/head/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2575

Re: lock order reversal bufwait/dirhash

2010-06-09 Thread Rui Paulo
On 9 Jun 2010, at 12:58, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 June 2010 3:51:52 am Bernd Walter wrote: Got this during installworld (source on NFS, destination UFS on CF-card) Source is current checked out yesterday. lock order reversal: 1st 0xc28b85b4 bufwait (bufwait) @ /data/builder

PF not working, with lock order reversal

2010-03-10 Thread Rob Farmer
getting the following LOR at boot and wonder if it is related? lock order reversal: 1st 0xc0424d28 pf task mtx (pf task mtx) @ /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:6929 2nd 0xf800011954f8 radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:360 KDB: stack backtrace: _witness_debugger

Re: PF not working, with lock order reversal

2010-03-10 Thread Rob Farmer
ruleset has worked fine for me for several years on this and other systems. I'm getting the following LOR at boot and wonder if it is related? lock order reversal:  1st 0xc0424d28 pf task mtx (pf task mtx) @ /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:6929  2nd 0xf800011954f8 radix node head (radix

5.2-BETA: IA32 SMP: atkbd gone, lock order reversal swap_pager/uma_core

2003-12-03 Thread Matthias Andree
management hardware on board which might interfere. Can this flags=0 be made the default or would that interfere with USB keyboard and headless configurations? 2. LOCK ORDER REVERSAL I let the machine buildworld, build a kernel and cvsup ports+doc at the same time through screen. Both buildworld

Re: lock order reversal

2003-12-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:46:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a known issue on 5.2 beta 6 sup'ed nov 29/03? Yes, it's reported on a daily basis and is harmless. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

lock order reversal

2003-11-30 Thread genew
Is this a known issue on 5.2 beta 6 sup'ed nov 29/03? lock order reveral 1st 0xc2121b58 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323 2nd 0xc0987b00 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1838 3rd 0xc1036948 vm object (vm object) @

another 5.2-BETA lock order reversal

2003-11-28 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Checked the archive and didn't see this one listed yet: lock order reversal  1st 0xc4047134 filedesc structure (filedesc structure)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_ generic.c:896  2nd 0xc0956a80 Giant (Giant)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:377 Stack backtrace

Re: another 5.2-BETA lock order reversal

2003-11-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:37:49PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote: Checked the archive and didn't see this one listed yet: lock order reversal ?1st?0xc4047134?filedesc?structure?(filedesc?structure)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_ generic.c:896 ?2nd?0xc0956a80?Giant?(Giant)[EMAIL

Re: lock order reversal

2003-11-27 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:05:36PM -0600, John wrote: i was just looking through my daily reports from my new 5.2 beta box and found this in dmesg. lock order reversal 1st 0xc08f7ce0 UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1201 2nd 0xc1031100 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys

lock order reversal is 5.2-BETA Nov 26

2003-11-27 Thread Mikhail Teterin
It did not crash or anything, but the following is printed on console now (addresses ommitted): lock order reversal 1st ... UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1201 2nd ... system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2210 Stack backtrace

Re: lock order reversal is 5.2-BETA Nov 26

2003-11-27 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:16:05PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: It did not crash or anything, but the following is printed on console now (addresses ommitted): lock order reversal 1st ... UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1201 2nd ... system map (system

Re: lock order reversal is 5.2-BETA Nov 26

2003-11-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:00:54PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:16:05PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: It did not crash or anything, but the following is printed on console now (addresses ommitted): lock order reversal 1st ... UMA lock (UMA lock

netgraph/ng_eiface double panic turnstile/sio lock order reversal in 5.2-BETA

2003-11-25 Thread Robin Breathe
:01' # ngctl shutdown vif0: lock order reversal 1st 0xc0765d8c turnstile chain (turnstile chain) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:370 2nd 0xc079a500 sio (sio) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sio/sio.c:3203 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c070794e,c079a500,c07502c0,c07502c0,c0719757) at backtrace+0x17

lock order reversal

2003-11-25 Thread John
i was just looking through my daily reports from my new 5.2 beta box and found this in dmesg. lock order reversal 1st 0xc08f7ce0 UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1201 2nd 0xc1031100 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2210 Stack backtrace: lock order reversal 1st

lock order reversal on 5.1

2003-10-26 Thread Nick H -- Network Operations
Got this earlier tonight on a box of mine... was testing a possible upgrade from 4.8 to 5.1 on a box to act as my router... dc0: promiscuous mode enabled Oct 26 20:32:37 router kernel: dc0: promiscuous mode enabled lock order reversal 1st 0xc05a4600 bpf global lock (bpf global lock) @ /usr/src

ip_divert.c lock order reversal

2003-10-17 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I just cvsup'd and noticed the following: Starting sshd. lock order reversal 1st 0xc2ee3998 inp (inp) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:1042 2nd 0xc094876c div (div) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_divert.c:225 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c08643de,c094876c,c087b2de,c087b2de,c086b1c6

Re: ip_divert.c lock order reversal

2003-10-17 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I am seeing an occasional kernel panic. I think it is related to natd and ip_divert Fatal trap 3: breakpoint instruction fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc07e6c24 stack pointer = 0x10:0xce7026c4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xce7026d0 code segment

lock order reversal

2003-10-13 Thread Hiroo Ono
I've got a lock order reversal. #uname -a FreeBSD barleycoren.oikumene.gcd.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Sep 23 21:37:42 JST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/usr/src/sys/BARLEYCOREN i386 Oct 11 18:14:53 barleycoren kernel: 1st 0xc082f060 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm

Lock order reversal

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Rand
Has anyone seen this before? Sep 5 15:06:02 rdaver kernel: lock order reversal Sep 5 15:06:02 rdaver kernel: 1st 0xcf33ba34 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ kern/sys_generic.c:895 Sep 5 15:06:02 rdaver kernel: 2nd 0xc054c640 Giant (Giant) @ fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:372 I've been

Lock order reversal

2003-07-07 Thread Andrew Kolchoogin
Dear colleagues, === lock order reversal 1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c04eacec,c082f110,c04fb2fa,c04fb2fa,c04fb1a2) at backtrace+0x17 witness_lock(c082f110,8,c04fb1a2,145,c082f0b0

Re: Lock order reversal

2003-07-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +0400, Andrew Kolchoogin wrote: lock order reversal 1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325 This is known to be harmless. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

lock order reversal on recent (06/30) CURRENT

2003-07-04 Thread Till Plewe
Is the following a known problem? (occured while running python2.3 using kse) lock order reversal 1st 0xc03c3c40 smp rendezvous (smp rendezvous) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_smp.c:3 13 2nd 0xc03c00c0 sched lock (sched lock) @ /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c:2 92 Stack backtrace: backtrace

lock order reversal under recent -CURRENT

2003-06-23 Thread Gordon Bergling
Hi, under a recent -CURRENT I get this: --- lock order reversal 1st 0xc2e475c8 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328 Stack backtrace

lock order reversal (2 different items)

2003-06-20 Thread Nick H.
Has anyone come across this before? dc0: promiscuous mode enabled Jun 20 09:56:15 router kernel: dc0: promiscuous mode enabled lock order reversal 1st 0xc05a0100 bpf global lock (bpf global lock) @ /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c:375 2nd 0xc1f5d7bc dc0 (network driver) @ /usr/src/sys/pci/if_dc.c:3543

RE: lock order reversal? current with tl ethernet

2003-03-13 Thread Tod McQuillin
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, John Baldwin wrote: It's holding the lock across bus_setup_intr(). You can try the following patch: Index: if_tl.c === RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/pci/if_tl.c,v retrieving revision 1.74 diff -u -r1.74

RE: lock order reversal? current with tl ethernet

2003-03-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Mar-2003 Tod McQuillin wrote: Running -current from March 11 on a dual cpu compaq 5100, there are some warnings in the dmesg about the tl ethernet interface. Here are the warnings: malloc() of 128 with the following non-sleepablelocks held: exclusive sleep mutex tl0 (network

lock order reversal? current with tl ethernet

2003-03-11 Thread Tod McQuillin
-current/src/sys/pci/if_tl.c:1146 malloc() of PROC with the following non-sleepablelocks held: exclusive sleep mutex tl0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc4017aa8) locked @ /usr/src/5-current/src/sys/pci/if_tl.c:1146 lock order reversal 1st 0xc4017aa8 tl0 (network driver) @ /usr/src/5-current/src/sys/pci

lock order reversal

2003-02-26 Thread Geoffrey
Good day ladies and gents Cvsupping and rebuilding a 5.0 current box to release Monday resulted in the following curiousness: lock order reversal 1st 0xc1190068 process lock (process lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2 112 2nd 0xc11ac934 filedesc structure (filedesc structure

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:30:09AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: It is becoming increasingly clear to me that the majority of FreeBSD developers don't really care if their code works, as long as they get the credit (and / or paycheck) for committing it. I think that's unnecessarily

fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Thanks to Paul Saab's work on fixing twe(4) I was able to get a crash dump from my box and figure out why my filedesc locking patch was panic'ing. kevent_close was dereferencing the proc's filedesc pointer during close, that doesn't work so well when you need to do what I had to do. :) The gist

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 3:04 AM -0800 2/14/03, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030214 02:52] wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks to Paul Saab's work on fixing twe(4) I was able to get a crash dump from my box How? I can't get a crash dump in

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks to Paul Saab's work on fixing twe(4) I was able to get a crash dump from my box How? I can't get a crash dump in -CURRENT, even on a plain jane ata disk, and it's been months since I last managed to get one. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav -

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030214 02:52] wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks to Paul Saab's work on fixing twe(4) I was able to get a crash dump from my box How? I can't get a crash dump in -CURRENT, even on a plain jane ata disk, and it's been months

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What exactly is broken about dumps for you on ata? Well, after you told me that call dumpsys is no longer kosher (when did that happen, and where was it documented?), I tried 'call doadump': # Debugger(manual escape to debugger) Stopped at

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:23:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: What exactly is broken about dumps for you on ata? Well, after you told me that call dumpsys is no longer kosher (when did that happen, and where was it documented?), I tried 'call doadump': # Debugger(manual escape to

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030214 03:23] wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What exactly is broken about dumps for you on ata? Well, after you told me that call dumpsys is no longer kosher (when did that happen, and where was it documented?), I tried 'call

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 21:53, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What exactly is broken about dumps for you on ata? Well, after you told me that call dumpsys is no longer kosher (when did that happen, and where was it documented?), I tried 'call doadump':

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: Makes me want to get my Norwegian Sword [tm] and make a short trip to Denmark. I my be reading my email out of order here, but I guess you changed your mind and tried to bury use with boatloads of useless asterix ('*') instead ? :-) It

Re: fix: lock order reversal proc/filedesc.

2003-02-14 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 14 February 2003 at 12:23:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What exactly is broken about dumps for you on ata? Well, after you told me that call dumpsys is no longer kosher (when did that happen, and where was it documented?), I tried

Lock order reversal

2003-01-28 Thread Sean Kelly
cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray open lock order reversal 1st 0xc6998a54 process lock (process lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2104 2nd 0xc6944234 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /usr/src/sys/kern

Re: Lock order reversal

2003-01-28 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable. See: http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547 -- Craig Rodrigues http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Lock order reversal

2003-01-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable. See: http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547 That's a turn your head and cough patch. It admits the code is broken, and leaves it broken. It also

Lock order reversal in if_ether.c

2003-01-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I am seeingthis from a kernel cvsup'd a few days ago: login: lock order reversal 1st 0xc060ad20 arp mutex (arp mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c:151 2nd 0xc339097c radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:549 Thanks. -- Craig Rodrigues http

Re: Lock order reversal in if_ether.c

2003-01-27 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
Hello, I've seen this very same message on one of my -current testboxes. While we're on the topic of LORs, I've also come across the following: Jan 27 00:44:57 largo kernel: lock order reversal Jan 27 00:44:57 largo kernel: 1st 0xc6708314 inp (inp) @../../../netinet/tcp_input.c:641 Jan 27 00:44

lock order reversal (arp mutex/radix node head)

2003-01-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
lock order reversal 1st 0xc03bbde0 arp mutex (arp mutex) @ ../../../netinet/if_ether.c:151 2nd 0xc6149e7c radix node head (radix node head) @ ../../../net/route.c:549 Debugger(witness_lock) Stopped at Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 db trace Debugger(c031e895,c6149e7c,c033b2a0

Re: no psm interrupt; lock order reversal

2003-01-21 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 23:07:36, netch (Valentin Nechayev) wrote about no psm interrupt; lock order reversal: VN 5.0-RC of 2002.12.05.12.00.00-UTC VN Bigger problem that it can't obtain interrupts from PS/2 mouse, VN hence mouse fails to work. systat shows no int 12 issued at all. ACPI

Re: lock order reversal

2003-01-10 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:56:39PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On 2003/01/05-00:25:17 leafy wrote: lock order reversal Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock) @/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 2nd

Re: lock order reversal

2003-01-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:56:39PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On 2003/01/05-00:25:17 leafy wrote: lock order reversal Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock) @/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 2nd 0xc2667e34 filedesc

Re: lock order reversal

2003-01-06 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
On 2003/01/05-00:25:17 leafy wrote: lock order reversal Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock) @/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 2nd 0xc2667e34 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2106

lock order reversal

2003-01-04 Thread leafy
lock order reversal Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock) @ /usr\ /src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 2nd 0xc2667e34 filedesc structure (filedesc struc\ ture) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2106 The kernel is only about 40 mins

  1   2   3   >