Well, several possible issues..
It probably isn't the best of all ideas to have BOTH IP firewalling
solutions installed and running at once. This will add some overhead. Pick
one and stick with it. And why do you have DUMMYNET running?
There is a new version of IPFilter in -CURRENT if I recall
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
| I have a DEC Alpha at home running 4.0-current and am willing to help out with
| the testing. I am not the worlds greatest coder, but am willing to do what I can
|
| Thanks!
|
| The 1st thing I want to be tested is that, a kernel with
| following
Kazu,
The comments on Linux were not mine. But I was echo'ing the
orginal poster's request that the keyboard mapping and console
(screen) settings be set to defaults that make sense vis-a-vis
PC hardware and PC users' common expectations. That simply means
that, to the extent possible, the
I've noticed the same thing on my Soundblaster Vibra 16X
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at The | AIM:
Thanks! Your patch worked so now there's no problem getting outside
using natd.
It is good info. I committed it.
I've gone through the checklist in your original message as well, and
have found so far:
Thanks a lot.
1) /sbin/route somehow assumes prefixlen 64 instead of 0 for the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: Also, with a 3c589c, hot plugging is like playing Russian Roulette
: with five of the six chambers full at the moment. Just booting with
: a pccard inserted sometimes crashes the machine. I think most
: peoples view of the current pccard
Why is ipf so slow? I was planning on switching from ipfw/natd to
ipf/ipnat, but i don't think i want to now - considering it's so darn slow.
ok, i have heard for a long time people claiming how much better is ipf over
ipfw etc. etc. I have briefly looked at docs and source for ipf.
I think
Alright, I've tried making each of the individual targets and I still get
this error so I'm stumped... a gzipped copy of the make world log can be
found at http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/world.log.gz
The error occurs while building kdump, and the error (of course) is at the
end of the file.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 08:32:19AM +, Brian Somers wrote:
Anyone know what's changed with `calendar' ? I suspect it's the
recent cpp changes.
Please test this patch.
Index: io.c
===
RCS file:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 15:17:11 +0100, "Alexander Sanda" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
First, plain (no module loaded):
You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config
file.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL
[Not network-related; moved to -current.]
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 10:02:25 -0600 (CST), Mohit Aron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Good Lord! This is the second time now. I even SAID in my last two mails that
there is only ONE processor. Theortically then, FreeBSD configured with/without
SMP support
Yes it should. SMP support enables inter-processor locking code which
does not exist in non-SMP kernels. Ergo, non-SMP kernels run
uniprocessor tasks faster.
Well, some difference is to be expected. But 22%
- Mohit
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:34:24 -0600 (CST), Mohit Aron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, some difference is to be expected. But 22%
Flaws in the Intel SMP design make it more expensive than it ought to
be. Things like atomic RMW cycles are very, very expensive. (We had
a discussion about six
At 10:23 AM 1/8/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 08:32:19AM +, Brian Somers wrote:
Anyone know what's changed with `calendar' ? I suspect it's the
recent cpp changes.
Please test this patch.
I was having the same problem and the patch worked for me
Thanks
Manfred
At 5:03 PM +0100 2000/1/8, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Other reasons for the switch could be the fact that ipf is stateful
(but i am working on adding state to ipfw, if i find proper support
- hint, hint), so you can build better things.
I'm moving towards using ipfilter on our Solaris
Hi committers!
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
And given that we've already slipped from December 15th, I think you
can treat this as a pretty hard deadline, to be further slipped only
grudgingly and in response to clear and dire need.
10 days, folks! Make
I've noticed that su(1) is not yet PAM'ized. Is anybody
working on this? If so, I'm willing to test. If not
and time permits, I'll see if I can whip up an appropriate
patch.
Kurt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
I believe I get the same thing too on my nonpnp SB16. Only noticed it
when playing short au files (didn't test anything else because it wasnt
noticable)
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
I've noticed the same thing on my Soundblaster Vibra 16X
At 02:32 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 11:29:36 -0800, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've noticed that su(1) is not yet PAM'ized. Is anybody
working on this? If so, I'm willing to test. If not
and time permits, I'll see if I can whip up an appropriate
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD-current (snapshot from Jan 3rd) which is configured
with both SMP and APIC_IO support. This version panics upon calling
acquire_timer0() (to modify the interrupt frequency of the 8254). On the other
hand, if the kernel is not configured as an SMP, then it works fine.
hello,
You may want to upgrade to a more recent source tree :
I've cvsupped from a 4.0-19991229-CURRENT snapshot to the sources around
01/05 21h00 GMT and SMP works fine on my machine (I have seen strange
things with the snapshot : cvs did not want to check out the source tree
! not a pleasant
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 12:42:58 -0800, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
can go away. WHEELSU can (and should) be provided by
pam_wheel.
wollman@khavrinen(2996)$ ls /usr/lib/pam_*.so
/usr/lib/pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so /usr/lib/pam_radius.so
/usr/lib/pam_deny.so
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Mohit Aron wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD-current (snapshot from Jan 3rd) which is configured
with both SMP and APIC_IO support. This version panics upon calling
acquire_timer0() (to modify the interrupt frequency of the 8254). On the other
hand, if the kernel is not
At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
one?
No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic.
Kurt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
one?
No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic.
If it came from the linux version of pam, then
Hello!
I think after some -stable period -current stay now like current :-)
I can't play wave files after upgrade my -current...
% ls -al /dev/MAKEDEV
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 35926 8 ÑÎ× 23:11 /dev/MAKEDEV
% uname -a
FreeBSD ozz.freebsd.org.ru 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jan
At 11:08 PM 1/8/00 +, David Malone wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
one?
No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic.
If it
Garrett Wollman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:27 PM
You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config
file.
Hm, what's this option for?
When I put it into my kernel config, the config program complained
about an "unknown option". A
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:11:49 +0100, you wrote:
After removing IPFILTER_LKM, I ran the bench again and got following
results.
What benchmark utility are you using to measure these results with?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:11:49 +0100, "Alexander Sanda" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[I wrote:]
You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config
file.
Hm, what's this option for?
Well, somebody may have broken it (perhaps even me). But it was put
there to provide those people
Well, I don't know about anyone else out there having the problems I'm
having, but I might as well ask. I'm using the ATA driver with the
following bugfix applied, otherwise the same.
Index: atapi-cd.c
===
RCS file:
[Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:31:19 -0800, "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
an alias.''
plonk
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman
Title: em general doc
Discount Capital
For
Equipment Leasing
Financing
We provide financing for
Commercial Equipment, Upgrading or Expansion High-Tech Equipment Leasing.
100% Financing on New
Used Equipment.
Sale Lease backs, Debt
Consolidations,
Deferred Payment
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
Well, I don't know about anyone else out there having the problems I'm
having, but I might as well ask. I'm using the ATA driver with the
following bugfix applied, otherwise the same.
At the risk of sounding like an AOLer, me too. Prior
I found the problems I was seeing. I had an old configuration of dhclient
dating from before it was integrated into FreeBSD. At that time, I just called
dhclient without specifying the interface. (I only had one NIC.) Dhclient then
tried using all interfaces it could find. One of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 8:08 PM
To: FreeBSD
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG
Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
snip
I think you are not only obnoxius, you are also
I found the problems I was seeing. I had an old configuration of dhclient
dating from before it was integrated into FreeBSD. At that time, I just called
dhclient without specifying the interface. (I only had one NIC.) Dhclient then
tried using all interfaces it could find. One of the
At 17:03 8/1/2000 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I think the basic rulechecking algorithms in ipf are no better/faster
than the ones in ipfw. If you want to switch from ipfw (no natd!)
to ipf just for performance reasons, i think you are not going to get
any significant advantage if any (i mean, if
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Boozy wrote:
How are the implementation of IPv6 in FreeBSD 4.0? Is it available? Is it
stable?
It's in the process of being integrated, and is therefore still
incomplete. It's hoped that by the time of 4.0-RELEASE (not long away) it
will be fully functional. If you need a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Eugene M.
Kim" writes:
: What is the current status of DEVFS? Is this still a `good feature to
: have but oh well...'-sort of thing so it is not supported by many
: drivers, or is some serious effort on track to round the sharp edges and
: make it usable?
Last
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
Well, I don't know about anyone else out there having the problems I'm
having, but I might as well ask. I'm using the ATA driver with the
following bugfix applied, otherwise the same.
At the
This shouldn't cause any breakage if you don't do this, but you should change
references to "controller" in your kernel configs to "device". Of course, don't
do this before recompiling usr.sbin/config. I have bumped configversion
as older configs will not appreciate this too much if you get
On both my current machines, I've problems rebooting.
After executing reboot, the system "clings desperately to life".
The behavior is not always the same, but I get 5-6 new login-prompts.
Then sometimes "Some process would not die, ps axl adviced"
Other times miscl panics.
Lately its final
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 01), Leif Neland said:
So far it has been taking 2 hours to compile sql_yacc.cc from
mysql3.22.
I had to find an old disk for swap, and it's swapping all the time.
top shows 156M size and 46M res., run time 20min's
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
The 1st thing I want to be tested is that, a kernel with
following additions to the config file
options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
options IPSEC #IP security
options IPSEC_ESP
:
:
:Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
:(IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
:list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
:info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it
FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
(Sorry -- Back to the topic.)
I have to admit that I've seen the same symptoms, and I have
no idea what's causing it. It happenes very irregularly
FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
It is not required, but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
FreeBSD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load spike strangeness
FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
50 matches
Mail list logo
