Hi all,
I have cvsupped and tried to build world mutiple times over the past 3
days, each time I get the same error. I have been following the mailing
lists and don't see any other complaints.. So I'm sure the trouble is
with my machine...
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libcrypto.so:
At 12:24 PM -0500 2000/3/3, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I'm just wondering -- when is RC3 expected? ? A lot has happened
since the 2/14 snap.
Well, Jordan is over here in the Netherlands (at the kickoff
meeting for the NL FreeBSD Users Group), so it's likely to be at
least a few more
At 12:24 PM 3/3/00 -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I'm just wondering -- when is RC3 expected? ? A lot has happened
since the 2/14 snap..
Try the 2/28 snap, unless another has been made within the day.
Doubtful.
At lot is still happening, so the 3/10 release will be changed.
Jeff Mountin -
I've been messing about with IPSEC in 4.0-current, and have observed some
unexpected behavior. Is there someone I can swap some email with off
the list to determine if what I'm seeing is a bug, or I'm just confused?
It has to do with security policy specifications and what SAID is being
Are you building with -DNOSHARE? That is the only way I can think of off the
top of my head.
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Palmer wrote:
Hi all,
I have cvsupped and tried to build world mutiple times over the past 3
days, each time I get the same error. I have been following the
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:28:13AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
It takes no more than a well-designed operating system service to
ensure that badly written programs don't fail to release resources
when they crash.
We didn't design that
William Woods wrote:
vm/vnode_pager.h - vm/vnode_pager.ph
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph.
*** Error code 1
Ideas about what died and why?
I got the same thing here. h2ph does not like /usr/include/des.h
which is a symlink to /usr/include/openssl/des.h,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 01:00:33AM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
current.freebsd.org is currently down due to a hardware failure. I don't
have an ETA on when it will be back up again, due to it being offsite.
I'll post more info as it becomes available.
Usually hardware and software
At 11:30 AM +0100 2000/3/4, Brad Knowles wrote:
Well, Jordan is over here in the Netherlands (at the kickoff meeting for
the NL FreeBSD Users Group), so it's likely to be at least a few more days.
I spoke with Jordan at the meeting, and it seems that there is
the chance it may
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:06:55PM -0800, Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
[Followups to -current]
I am running monday's current, Mesa-glx for Riva, XFree 3.3.6 and
KDE 1.1.2. All from monday's ports tree.
Well, I think I can't say I am running this system, for I am getting
the following
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:28:34AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
One thing to keep in mind is that on Sept 8, 2000 the patent for RSA
expires and this whole mess goes away. Or at least devolves into the
usual crypto export mess rather than the crypto export plus rsa patent
law plus rsaref
running 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #10: Wed Mar 1 10:25:09 PST 2000 doing
a make world with a cvsup of today I get:
sys/mount.h - sys/mount.ph
sys/msg.h - sys/msg.ph
sys/msgbuf.h - sys/msgbuf.ph
sys/mtio.h - sys/mtio.ph
sys/namei.h - sys/namei.ph
sys/param.h -
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 03:23:17PM +1100, Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dump fills up precisely the entire 'b' partition. Since the
partition begins at offset 0, the dump overwrites the label at sector
offset 1 and any bootblocks at
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sean-Paul Rees writes:
: I have a FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (cvsup'ed as of tonight) machine. It has a USB
: controller (PIIX3) and an ethernet controller sharing irq 10. I'm not
: much in the way of a hardware expert, so I'm wondering if this is safe or
: if I should
On 4 Mar 2000 02:01:03 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
William Woods wrote:
Running 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #10: Wed Mar 1 10:25:09 PST 2000 on a
IBM thinkpad 600E, 128 megs. while doing a make world of todays CVSUP I get
this:
What command line did you
Can someone tell me the exact date that 4.x was split from 3.x? I couldn't
seem to pin it down based on the CVS repository.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi all, I have been working with FreeBSD 4.0-current lately and I have
found a strange thing or two. Here is the really big one that is stopping
me from performing my evil experiments }-D
When I mount a pass-through based file system (null and union both exhibit
this behavior) more than one
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris Kennaway
writes:
: Can someone tell me the exact date that 4.x was split from 3.x? I couldn't
: seem to pin it down based on the CVS repository.
Based on sys/i386/conf/files.i386:
1/20/99 to 2/10/99
Based on sys/conf/files:
1/17/99 to 1/21/99
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
Based on sys/i386/conf/files.i386:
1/20/99 to 2/10/99
Based on sys/conf/files:
1/17/99 to 1/21/99
So I'd say it was somewhere between 1/20/99 and 1/21/99. Is that
close enough for you to "exact"? The branching proccess takes a
while,
A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 -
linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented
After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in
`linux/include/linux/fs.h':
/* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
The kernel had DDB enabled. I was running X, but I didn't see any
signs of the kernel attempting to get into
21 matches
Mail list logo