Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
and send it to the core team.
Feel free to copy mine, and send it to the core team...
/* A short and sweet application */
int
main()
{
write( 1, Hello World!\n, 13);
return( 0);
}
--
On 2001.06.08 00:47 Terry Lambert wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
and send it to the core team.
Feel free to copy mine, and send it to the core team...
/* A short and sweet application */
int
main()
{
Matthew Jacob wrote:
[ ... FreeBSD Legato client coredump ... ]
This is really a 'ports' issue...
No, it's an Advocacy and commercial support of FreeBSD issue.
I don't know why this happens. It was suggested that it
was probably a bug in nsrexecd- malloc maybe. Possibly.
It doesn't
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I'm able to setup the realm correctly but when I try to run the
k5admind daemon, it cores whenever I try to connect to it. I'll look into
building a debug version and try to get some more info on this one.
Do you run the k5admind from inetd or
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Idea Receiver wrote:
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote,
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x28121637 in _fd_lock_backout () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
You're not running -current if you're using libc_r.so.4.
We're at libc_r.so.5. And fd locks have also been disabled
in -current.
err~~ sorry about my stupid... i
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Matthew Jacob wrote:
[ ... FreeBSD Legato client coredump ... ]
This is really a 'ports' issue...
No, it's an Advocacy and commercial support of FreeBSD issue.
I don't know why this happens. It was suggested that it
was probably a bug
I sent this to Mobile yesterday and didn't get an answer. I sure don't
feel good being the only person with this problem, but . . . I've cleaned
and polished my pointy hat.
I updated my world and kernel from a cvsup of May 26 to June 6, including
a mergemaster run that included a new
Brian Somers wrote:
I've had reports of this in the past. The other end is sending a
``code 5'' packet - something that doesn't appear in the spec :(
ppp(8) just ignores these (emitting a warning), they shouldn't be
causing any problems themselves (even if CBCP is actually being used).
I upgraded to last nights's -current.
UPGRADING said:
20010604:
pccard support for pci cards has been committed. You must change
your /etc/pccard.conf irq lines. It must match the irq used by
pcic device. Interrupt storms may result if you fail to do this.
I started tracking -current about 5 years ago. It was interesting. I
learned a lot. I did a few fox paws and saw a few. Maybe I helped
a time or two in testing and reporting.
My last world was two or three months ago. The one before that was
similar. I am not tracking so I should be with
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:55:40PM -0700, Seth Kingsley wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
kernel: pcic1: TI PCI-1225 PCI-CardBus Bridge irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0
in pccard.conf I had
irq 11
is this not what I was supposed to do?
Sorry,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:33:22PM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP
Why can't a filesystem hacker back it out until his return? Things are
not getting better and this is tripping up more and more people.
The enclosed patch might help somewhat against the active pagedep
panics introduced in revision 1.98 of ffs_softdep.c. Instead of a
panic, a message is
After blowing away my obj/ and src/ directories and
getting them fresh, this problem was no longer
present... not sure what caused them, but either
I had something strange in my obj/ or src/ tree,
or the problem was fixed in the last week.
Regards,
Tony.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, John Baldwin
So the question remains..
where was I supposed to change the interrupt mentionned in the
UPDATING entry..
if not in the pccard.conf, then where?
I certainly get the 'hangs' mentionned as being a symptom
of NOT doing it..
Warner?
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at
Folks,
I checked the commits and the recent list mail, but there's no hint as to
why a recent world (supped earlier this evening) would have had this happen.
It seems when I attempt to execute non-native binaries (such as linux
binaries: netscape, etc) I am seeing complaints like the following:
Brain fart on my end. Sorry for wasted bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin P.
Grubin
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: strangeness in recent current
Folks,
I checked the
23 matches
Mail list logo
