I have had almost exactly same problems about year ago. Orinoco silver
stopped two times after 25 - 28 day working with freebsd current under
somewhat strong load. Even after reboot it didn't work anymore. I burned
two times new firmware and the card started to
Hello,
Has anyone had any success with this combo?
It compiles fine, but the X server aborts due to bus error (SIGBUS)
generated by something in xf86GetPciBridgeInfo()
(xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c)
Running -CURRENT (World/kernel) as of December 29. XFree86 sources as
of
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:09:28AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone had any success with this combo?
Yes. Apart from the known problem with my S3 Virge GX2 graphics adapter,
which causes random freezes under X when only the reset button helps.
But this has been happening
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already
in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd
December) and FreeBSD is from 25th December.
I just updated the sources to HEAD, and I see
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already
in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd
December) and FreeBSD is from
I just cvsup'd the latest -CURRENT sources (8 hours ago) and I'm having trouble doing
a buildworld.
Specifically, I get this:
=== sys/boot/i386/boot2
btxld -v -E 0x2000 -f bin -b /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l
boot2.ldr -o boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin
kernel: ver=1.01
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:33:15 -0500
Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just cvsup'd the latest -CURRENT sources (8 hours ago) and I'm having trouble
doing a buildworld.
cvsup again, I just build world and it works :)
flynn@christine# uname -a
FreeBSD christine.energyhq.tk 5.0-CURRENT
This is 5.0-RC2 from 3 days ago:
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Coll
fxp0 1500 Link#1 00:90:27:91:4f:ad 228 0 337 0 0
fxp0 1500 192.58.161.22 honker 238 - 343 - -
fxp0 1500
Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to
tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the
road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a reason to
complain, right? :).)
Sources from HEAD around 04:15 -0600 today.
Currently, Im running STABLE on my machine, which serves as both a
desktop and a server. It seems to work great and everything. Does
everything I need it to do.
Is there any compelling reason for me to upgrade to 5.0 next year? I've
read over the list of anticipated new features and there's
Built and installed a new kernel, problem went away.
tnx
-kim
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. Got the following error
during cleaning:
=== usr.sbin/fwcontrol
cd: can't cd to /usr/src/usr.sbin/fwcontrol
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin.
*** Error code 1
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P.
Try cvs co -P.
Got the following error during cleaning:
=== usr.sbin/fwcontrol
cd: can't cd to
* De: Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-31 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: buildworld failure ]
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64.
Didn't matter whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P.
Try cvs co -P.
No, -Pd.
A simple -P seemed to work, thanks! I'm kind of new to this CVS stuff. Hope
you will succeed in Modula-3 ported to sparc64 soon.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote:
Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to
tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the
road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a reason to
complain, right? :).)
Many
Hi,
I don't think this will be of any use - i could not get a dump - but
my system just panicked. background fsck was in progress. Here
is the panic and backtrace:
Dec 31 20:50:59 epsilon kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Dec 31 20:50:59 epsilon kernel: fault virtual
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote:
Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to
tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the
road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Other than background fsck, there was only a single console login, a
copy of screen, and a single outbound SSH. No X or anything else running.
I only sent the email 5 minutes ago, and already two people have corrected
me :) The distributed.net client
All,
Thanks to help from Jake Burkholder and Anders Norby, FreeBSD
5.0-RC2/sparc64 was finally finished and should be available from most
of the ftp sites now in both ISO and ftp formats.
There is about a week to go until RC3 is scheduled to be cut, so please
test this and the other arch's if
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
23 matches
Mail list logo
