On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 12:02:23PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-current, system did panic everytime at the end of
initialisation of parity (raidctl -iv raid?). So I used the
raidframe patch for -stable at
Hi,
On an SMP system I cvsup-ped to the latest kernel source, made the new
kernel (the usual config, make depend, make, make modules, make install)
and after I rebooted I tried make buildworld. On most systems I upgraded
this worked just fine, except for the single SMP system I have: it seems
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:14:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this? My clock is running double time, that is,
each second it advances two seconds. Needless to say, ntpd can't sync
up with any servers.
This has been reported several times (searching the mailinglist
/vol4/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls: Out of space
mabye it's just me... but you may wish to check the space left avail on the
drive you're compiling on... it clearly states Out of space. ?
Just a wild guess though...
Regards,
Nick H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Paul
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
Poul-Henning you promised me a patch two nights ago within a couple
of hours It's now going on the 36th hour since.
Yeah, well, I didn't calculate with being hit by influenze :-(
Can you try this one:
Index: twe_compat.h
January-February 2003 Status Report
Introduction:
Another busy two months have passed in the FreeBSD project. With 5.0
released, attention is focusing on making it faster via more
fine-grained locking, adding more high-end features like large memory
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
Poul-Henning you promised me a patch two nights ago within a couple
of hours It's now going on the 36th hour since.
Ok, 2nd try, this even compiles:
Index: twe_compat.h
===
Check these out:
http://chat.carleton.ca/~creyenga/1sttime.JPG
http://chat.carleton.ca/~creyenga/again.JPG
Pretty strange, my normally-aspirated computer is somehow using 168% of cpu.
boss# uname -a
FreeBSD boss.sewer.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Mar 7
01:49:18 EST 2003
[EMAIL
Title: ´ëÇѹα¹ ´ëÇ¥ ¸®ÇÊ»çÀÌÆ® :: Refill.co.kr
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ× ¹ý·ü Á¦
50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÏ¿© Á¦¸ñ¿¡
Ah,
I should have mentioned that: there is about 8 GB available on /vol4, on
/usr there is 3 GB, / 300 MB, so I don't think it's worth trying on
another disk...
BTW, It looks like the problem is in the ioctl_includes=`` - it never
gets any further. (Checked with echo's.)
Paul
Nick H. wrote:
Lucky Green (Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 06:40:58PM -0800) wrote:
I am seeing a lot of crashes of GBDE, causing ENOMEM errors to scroll
rapidly on the console. Whenever this happens, the server becomes
unresponsive to keyboard or any other input and has to be power cycled.
Is there some debug setting
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lucky Green writes:
I am seeing a lot of crashes of GBDE, causing ENOMEM errors to scroll
rapidly on the console. Whenever this happens, the server becomes
unresponsive to keyboard or any other input and has to be power cycled.
Is there some debug setting that I can
Hi,
I've upgraded to -CURRENT from -STABLE yesterday.
But something strange with ATA.
It can't be used in UDMA100 mode.
In boot message,
...
pci0: mass storage, ATA at device 2.5 (no driver attached)
...
ad0: 78533MB IC35L080AVVA07-0 [159560/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4
ad1: 39266MB
Hi,
My -CURRENT(2003/03/12) box crashes while using linux-mozilla.
# gdb -k kernel.debug.0 vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of
Hi,
My -CURRENT(2003/03/14) box crashes when I tried to mount UDF(DVD-RAM).
# mount -t udf -o ro /dev/acd0 /dvdram
Here is the stack trace,
# gdb -k kernel.debug.0 vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030315 01:59] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
Poul-Henning you promised me a patch two nights ago within a couple
of hours It's now going on the 36th hour since.
Ok, 2nd try, this even compiles:
That looks like it might
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030315 01:59] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
Poul-Henning you promised me a patch two nights ago within a couple
of hours It's now going on the 36th hour since.
Ok,
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030315 04:09] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030315 01:59] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes:
Poul-Henning you promised me a patch two nights ago within a
On 15-Mar-2003 Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Now, really, am I the only one experiencing this?
No, you're not. I've been unable to get a bootable kernel running for the
last few days also.
Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just
cheer! wilma heeft het door.
guest werkt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Conrad Sabatier
Sent: zaterdag 15 maart 2003 13:22
To: Bryan Liesner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: panic on boot (devfs_find)
On 15-Mar-2003 Bryan Liesner
whoops wrong list...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bug
Sent: zaterdag 15 maart 2003 13:25
To: Conrad Sabatier; Bryan Liesner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: panic on boot (devfs_find)
cheer! wilma heeft het door.
guest werkt.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 08:27:27PM +0900, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
Hi,
My -CURRENT(2003/03/14) box crashes when I tried to mount UDF(DVD-RAM).
# mount -t udf -o ro /dev/acd0 /dvdram
[...]
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
[...]
(kgdb) bt
[...]
#10 0xc039bcbb in panic (fmt=0x0) at
Hello,
I have exactly the same problem with my system (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #8: Thu Mar
13 15:56:51 CET 2003). My board is a K7S6A with SiS745 North- and Southbridge.
pciconf -lv tells me that my IDE Controller is the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:5: class=0x010180 card=0x0a411019
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:14:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this? My clock is running double time, that is,
each second it advances two seconds. Needless to say, ntpd can't sync
up with any servers.
You almost certainly have a motherboard with bad ACPI (probably
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jmmr# dmesg | egrep '(ad0|ata|ATA)'
pci0: mass storage, ATA at device 2.5 (no driver attached)
ata0 at port 0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa0
ata1 at port 0x376,0x170-0x177 irq 15 on isa0
ad0: 38166MB ST340823A [77545/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4
acd0: CDROM
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:51:09PM +, David Malone wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:14:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this? My clock is running double time, that is,
each second it advances two seconds. Needless to say, ntpd can't sync
up with any servers.
On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
Please make sure that ata-chipset.c is rev 1.14 which corrected a
bug in the chip ident function...
ata-chipset.c 1.14 was checked in on March 12 my kernel is from two days after.
So I guess it is included. I cvsuped the same sources I used to compile my
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
Please make sure that ata-chipset.c is rev 1.14 which corrected a
bug in the chip ident function...
ata-chipset.c 1.14 was checked in on March 12 my kernel is from two days after.
So I guess it is included. I
From: Soeren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SiS5591(?) ATA
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:06:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, OK, try this patch:
become better.
but still it does't work in UDMA100.
atapci0: SiS 961 UDMA100 controller port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on
It seems FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
become better.
but still it does't work in UDMA100.
atapci0: SiS 961 UDMA100 controller port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
ad0:
From: Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: crash: lockmgr: locking against myself
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:36:41 +1100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a simple untested patch to try which makes udf_allocv() return
an unlocked vnode. I'm not sure whether the locking in udf_hashins()
On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
atapci0: SiS 961 UDMA100 controller port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on
pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
ad0: 78533MB IC35L080AVVA07-0 [159560/16/63] at
--- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just before the panic
is mounting root and then starting (or trying to start) /sbin/init. After an
initial hang, it drops into ddb.
--
I found the same problem for the last two days.
From: Soeren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SiS5591(?) ATA
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:14:16 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, the cable detection sems to be failing somehow...
Now is the chip found correctly ? is it *really* a SiS 961 (old ATA100 model)?
How can I make it
From: FUJITA Kazutoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: crash: lockmgr: locking against myself
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 05:23:51 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks good for me.
At least, crash is avoided and mount successfully.
I could mount DVD-RAM successfully.
(This media was
So far today this file has been updated four times and it still
won't compile. Can this be debugged off-line before being committed?
I'm trying to debug another problem and I haven't been able to work
on it all day because of this problem.
Thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 06:47:27PM +0100, Morten Rodal wrote:
[snip the parent post]
I just got another one of these. This time it didn't double panic
while syncing the disks. I've been getting this quite often now,
almost daily. If there is anything else I can help you with to get to
the
On Saturday, 15 March 2003 at 10:34:54 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 12:02:23PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-current, system did panic everytime at the end of
initialisation of parity (raidctl -iv raid?). So I used the
raidframe patch for
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg 'groggy' Lehey
writes:
Ok, I'll try to simulate the disk failure by switching off the
power, then.
I think you misunderstand. I simulated the disk failures by doing a
stop -f. I can't see any way that the way they go down can
influence the revive
On Saturday, 15 March 2003 at 23:56:24 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg 'groggy' Lehey
writes:
Ok, I'll try to simulate the disk failure by switching off the
power, then.
I think you misunderstand. I simulated the disk failures by doing a
stop -f. I
Craig,
That's the normal output of 'top -S'.
Regards,
Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant
Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Craig Reyenga wrote:
Check these out:
http://chat.carleton.ca/~creyenga/1sttime.JPG
'cc1' is _not_ a system process. How is this normal?
-Craig
- Original Message -
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Craig Reyenga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 19:52
Subject: Re: Top weirdness.
Craig,
That's the normal output
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, walt wrote:
So far today this file has been updated four times and it still won't
compile. Can this be debugged off-line before being committed?
You just happened to catch it at a bad time. Sorry for the trouble.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E
Craig,
It's not a system process, but it's GCC (step 2) running as root. You were
building software (ports, kernel or other) when the screenshot was taken.
top -S displays non-system processes as well as system processes.
The 168% in the weighed CPU field is a little odd, but it's an
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
I could mount DVD-RAM successfully.
But, some files can't be read.
How can I solve this?
# /bin/ls
. .. VR_MANGR.BUPVR_MANGR.IFOVR_MOVIE.VRO
# /bin/ls -l
ls: VR_MOVIE.VRO: Bad file descriptor
total 111
Hello Maksim,
At first, I installed 5-CURRENT on P3 machine and sync with cvsup to
latest. and overwrite 2003-03-05 maksim's bluetooth modules.
please verify that tarball you have downloaded has both kernel
and userland stuff, i.e. you have sys, share, usr.bin and usr.sbin
in the
On 15-Mar-2003 Shizuka Kudo wrote:
--- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just before the
panic is mounting root and then starting (or trying to start) /sbin/init.
After an initial hang, it drops into ddb.
--
I found
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UDF: bad file descriptor
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:09:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# /bin/ls -l
ls: VR_MOVIE.VRO: Bad file descriptor
total 111
drw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 2048 Mar 12 13:33 .
drw-rw-rw- 4 root
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes:
I've been unable to boot any kernel I've built since about March 11
and I've narrowed it down to the GEOM_MBR option.
With GEOM_MBR I get a kernel page fault error when trying to
mount the root filesystem at boot time.
Can you
Hi,
Sorry for neglecting UDF for so long. Regarding this problem, what
program was used to generate the UDF filesystem on the disk? If the
disk doesn't have much data on it, would it be possible to 'dd' an
image of the disk to a file and send me the file?
Scott
FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
From:
On 15-Mar-2003 Shizuka Kudo wrote:
I found the same problem for the last two days. However, it seems that this
problem doesn't appear in the GENERIC kernel. I have tried putting the
INVARIANTS stuffs back to my custom config file and it works as well. Very
strange...
I just built a
Are you trying to compile the -stable version of gcc? We make significant
modifications to integrate it within our environment. I would not at all
be suprised if the -stable version of gcc doesn't build on -current.
...
You are aware that there are gcc ports set up to configure the FSF
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 06:06:50AM +0900, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
I could mount DVD-RAM successfully.
(This media was formatted by TOSHIBA HDDDVD video recorder;-p)
But, some files can't be read.
How can I solve this?
[...]
# /bin/ls -l
ls: VR_MOVIE.VRO: Bad file descriptor
total 111
--- Bryan Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to get a kernel up and running (strangely) on 3/12, but
commits after that cause an immediate panic as soon as init starts.
If I build a kernel from sources cut off at 3/10/2003 at 12:00,
everything works fine.
It is related to the
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jody Franklin wrote:
I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so,
and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on
March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front's SBLive/Audigy driver) causes a
kernel panic on load. If I don't
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Shizuka Kudo wrote:
--- Bryan Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to get a kernel up and running (strangely) on 3/12, but
commits after that cause an immediate panic as soon as init starts.
If I build a kernel from sources cut off at 3/10/2003 at 12:00,
Thus spake Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jody Franklin wrote:
I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so,
and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on
March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front's
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 06:47:27PM +0100, Morten Rodal wrote:
[snip the parent post]
I just got another one of these. This time it didn't double panic
while syncing the disks. I've been getting this quite often now,
almost daily. If there is
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:46:13AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 06:47:27PM +0100, Morten Rodal wrote:
[snip the parent post]
I just got another one of these. This time it didn't double panic
while syncing the disks.
59 matches
Mail list logo
