Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-13 Thread Daniel Eischen
On 13 Jun 2003, Samy Al Bahra wrote: Hey, I believe the fix is as simple as saving and restoring %gs in the nVidia driver, and/or not letting the nVidia use %gs at all (segment registers generally belong to the OS, in any case, and stealing a CPU register of any kind for exclusive use

Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Samy Al Bahra wrote: I think Terry is jumping to conclusions on what Evan's problem could be. I have this seen this cause application to crash at exit (if using OpenGL) but never a crash in kernel-space from the nVidia drivers. 1) It works with libc_r, but not with libthr and not

Re: adsl/pppoe no longer connecting on 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Acutally -std=c?9, -std=gnu?9 uses GCC's alloca. I don't mind finding all the alloca uses in the tree and compiling them with -std=gnu99 instead of -std=c99. #define alloca(sz) __builtin_alloca(sz) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR/53008

2003-06-13 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi Peter, would you please be so kind and have a look at PR/53008 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=53008), because you committed src/sys/i386/acpica/genwakecode.sh and under some circumstances an errornously output is generated (details in PR). The problem hits me when I was updating

Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-13 Thread Samy Al Bahra
Daniel Eischen Wrote: No, I don't think Terry is jumping to conclusion. Read the archives of this problem. The Nvidia drivers and OpenGL for FreeBSD won't work with -current and any threading library other than libc_r. I didn't deal with any users having kernel crashes from this %gs

Re: CSTD=c99 breaks package creation

2003-06-13 Thread David Schultz
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003, Tim Robbins wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:37:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: It's possible that there's either a bug in gcc or there is C code in the system that has a different meaning when interpreted to C99 standards. I think I may have found the problem,

Re: freebsd-current Digest, Vol 12, Issue 13

2003-06-13 Thread support
Please use our new ticket-based support system. Doing so will allow us to handle your request more efficiently and quickly. http://www.wasabihosting.com/helpdesk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Samy Al Bahra wrote: Daniel Eischen Wrote: No, I don't think Terry is jumping to conclusion. Read the archives of this problem. The Nvidia drivers and OpenGL for FreeBSD won't work with -current and any threading library other than libc_r. I didn't deal with any users having kernel

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

2003-06-13 Thread Markus Wennrich
UPDATE: If I make an SMP-kernel this issue is completely solved for me. Everythings works as before, both fxp's share the same irq (together with uhci), both are working, with sio, usb, etc ... like as before the evil cvsup :-) Markus On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:34:15AM +0200, Markus Wennrich

Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-13 Thread Bruno Afonso
hello, Any chance someone can support nforce2's chipset agp? Not all of us own nvidia graphics cards :-( I don't know how hard it is to get this working on freebsd. here's some code:

Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default?

2003-06-13 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Right now, rc.firewall isn't set up to support DHCP configurations although it could easily be done so. Googling comes up with many references, for example http://www.freebsddiary.org/firewall.php (section ipfw with DHCP etc at the bottom of the page). Are there any reasons against having

RE: ALTQ for FreeBSD 5.1?

2003-06-13 Thread Holger Kipp
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is anyone working on ALTQ intergration for FreeBSD 5.1? [...] I recently took interest in this (about a month ago) and had ALTQ port updated to work with the latest 5.0. The only issue I have had was with fxp and TBR magic;

Re: ALTQ for FreeBSD 5.1?

2003-06-13 Thread Bruno Afonso
Holger Kipp wrote: If you're looking for a fxp hacker, mux is the one you want ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). He's also on irc.freenode.net with the same nickname. Isn't someone working on integrating ALTQ and pf - similar to what has been done for OpenBSD? here you go:

Re: ALTQ for FreeBSD 5.1?

2003-06-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruno Afonso wrote: Holger Kipp wrote: Isn't someone working on integrating ALTQ and pf - similar to what has been done for OpenBSD? here you go: http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/index.html I'd love freebsd to have altq and pf or ipf integration on base system.. If it can be one as

Re: ALTQ for FreeBSD 5.1?

2003-06-13 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:39:37AM +, Holger Kipp wrote: Erik Paulsen Skaalerud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is anyone working on ALTQ intergration for FreeBSD 5.1? [...] I recently took interest in this (about a month ago) and had ALTQ port updated to work with the latest

Re: Duplicate keys in CVSROOT/modules

2003-06-13 Thread Michael L. Hostbaek
David O'Brien (obrien) writes: Any committer can fix this -- just check out modules and add port_ in front of the ports one. Ah ! It has been fixed now. /mich -- Best Regards, Michael L. Hostbaek FreeBSD Committer - FreeBSD: The power to serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small

2003-06-13 Thread John Hay
Hi, On a 5.1-RELEASE machine I have been able to cause a panic like this: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 28610560 total allocated The machine is an old 300MHz Celeron with 64M Ram. I get the panic by un-taring a huge .tgz file onto a vinum partition which is on a scsi disk behind

Re: Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default?

2003-06-13 Thread David Wolfskill
From: Roderick van Domburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:18:45 +0200 Subject: Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default? Right now, rc.firewall isn't set up to support DHCP configurations although it could easily be done so. More or less, depending on one's

rpc.yppasswdd failed in FreeBSD 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Lin, Tsung Ching
hello, I setup a NIS Master in FreeBSD 5.1 release, and it works. I also startup rpc.yppasswdd. When I wnat to change a user's passwd using yppasswd, it failed. root# passwd testuser Changing NIS password for testuser Old Password: New Password: Retype New Password: passwd: pam_chauthtok():

Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread Andrey Chernov
After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails to start. When I restore old libc and rebuild libc without gnu99, all works fine again. ___ [EMAIL

Compaq Presario 2140US w/Current - no mouse/pointpad?!

2003-06-13 Thread Karl Denninger
Hi folks; I've got an odd one here... Trying to run 5.1-RELEASE on a Presario 2140-US laptop (4.x locks up in an odd way on boot, and I can't get into the user config - that goes into an infinite keyboard read loop at boot when you use the -c option?!) Anyway, the -c option appears to have been

Belkin USB 2.0 Cardbus card

2003-06-13 Thread Paul T. Root
Has anyone got one of these cards working? I plug it into my laptop with 5.1, cvsupped on Monday or Tuesday (long week), and try to plug this card in. It is recognized the card, but has errors and disables them. I also am trying a Sony DRX-500UL drive. It's recognized in the built-in USB 1.1

panic: kmem_map too small: the downside of FreeBSD 5

2003-06-13 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: On a 5.1-RELEASE machine I have been able to cause a panic like this: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 28610560 total allocated Manually tune your system. This panic results from the fact that zone allocations with fixed limits don't really do the right thing any

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-06-13 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-13 16:00:14 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-06-13 16:00:14 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-13 16:02:10 - building world TB --- cd

Re: Belkin USB 2.0 Cardbus card

2003-06-13 Thread Alistair Sutton
* Paul T. Root ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Has anyone got one of these cards working? I plug it into my laptop with 5.1, cvsupped on Monday or Tuesday (long week), and try to plug this card in. It is recognized the card, but has errors and disables them. A fix for this was posted to the

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-06-13 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-13 17:10:08 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-06-13 17:10:08 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-13 17:11:54 - building world TB --- cd

Re: panic: kmem_map too small: the downside of FreeBSD 5

2003-06-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: John Hay wrote: On a 5.1-RELEASE machine I have been able to cause a panic like this: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 28610560 total allocated Manually tune your system. This panic results from the fact that zone allocations with

Re: freebsd-current Digest, Vol 12, Issue 14

2003-06-13 Thread support
Please use our new ticket-based support system. Doing so will allow us to handle your request more efficiently and quickly. http://www.wasabihosting.com/helpdesk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-06-13 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-13 18:12:27 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-06-13 18:12:27 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-13 18:15:11 - building world TB --- cd

Re: *IT WORKS* Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD)

2003-06-13 Thread Tony Naggs
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Boston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 08:14, Anthony Naggs wrote: Sorry, I don't understand this comment. All OHCI, UHCI EHCI USB controllers need PCI bus mastering in order to read update their various lists of pending completed

Re: SMP in 5.1 cant deactivate hyperthreading

2003-06-13 Thread Doug White
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Killing wrote: Halting them will still cause the CPUs to be detected. They just won't do any useful work. Yep but the issue is that all the core admin tools are unaware of this and hence include the virtual cores in idle calcs etc making load monitoring impossible

Re: build flags for a 386DX (5.1)

2003-06-13 Thread Doug White
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Nielsen wrote: [escalated from -questions] Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. That works? 386 is not a supported CPU on 5.X. It is missing atomic operations that is necesary for proper operation of threading. -- Doug White

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails to start. When I restore old libc and rebuild libc without gnu99, all works fine

Buildworld failing in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd

2003-06-13 Thread Fish
Hello list, I'm sure I've done something naughty as I've been seeing errors for a few days, but I've done some troubleshooting and I can't seem to find the place I shot myself in the foot. My system is current, and about a week old right now. Source was checked out this morning at about 8:30

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:27 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails to start. When I

Re: Buildworld failing in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd

2003-06-13 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:42:20PM -0400, Fish wrote: Hello list, I'm sure I've done something naughty as I've been seeing errors for a few days, but I've done some troubleshooting and I can't seem to find the place I shot myself in the foot. This is getting a FAQ; I'll add an entry to

Re: Buildworld failing in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd

2003-06-13 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 13 Jun 2003 15:42:20 -0400, Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list, I'm sure I've done something naughty as I've been seeing errors for a few days, but I've done some troubleshooting and I can't seem to find the place I shot myself in the foot. My system is current, and about a week old

Re: rpc.yppasswdd failed in FreeBSD 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 13), Lin, Tsung Ching said: hello, I setup a NIS Master in FreeBSD 5.1 release, and it works. I also startup rpc.yppasswdd. When I wnat to change a user's passwd using yppasswd, it failed. root# passwd testuser Changing NIS password for testuser Old Password:

Re: *IT WORKS* Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD)

2003-06-13 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 14:17, Tony Naggs wrote: Yes, I think you should also do this for Uhci. There are probably not many straight Uhci USB 1.1 Cardbus cards, but it is likely some of the USB 2.0 cards have an UHCI controller rather than OHCI for USB 1.x support. Never mind, it seems Warner

Re: build flags for a 386DX (5.1)

2003-06-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Nielsen wrote: [escalated from -questions] Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. That works? 386 is not a supported CPU on 5.X. It is missing atomic operations that is

Re: build flags for a 386DX (5.1)

2003-06-13 Thread John Nielsen
On Friday 13 June 2003 15:02, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Nielsen wrote: [escalated from -questions] Hi folks- I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. That works? 386 is not a supported CPU

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-06-13 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-13 20:30:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-06-13 20:30:15 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-13 20:32:42 - building world TB

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:51:28PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:27 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 14:53:07 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: This isn't a bug report. The mail server I am writing this from, and the laptop I am using to log into it from; are running with a stock world and I can't repeat your problem. Exact steps are (on i386-current from Jun 1, cvsupped to

Re: redirect unauthorized users to a login page (natd as atransparent proxy)

2003-06-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:53:48AM +0200, Vaclav Petricek wrote: [...] The patch works. Thank you very much. I attach my attempt on a patch that should make it possible to ommit the alias_address and interface options in case proxy_only is specified. IMHO in that situation these options are

CSTD=c99 considered harmful (Re: adsl/pppoe no longer connecting on5.1)

2003-06-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:08:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:32:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: alloca() is not being inlined when -std is specified. It is possible there's a bug in the libc implementation. I'm also suspicious that some of the ppp data

Re: rpc.yppasswdd failed in FreeBSD 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Lin, Tsung Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: passwd: pam_chauthtok(): error in service module Jun 13 22:22:24 abcb passwd: in pam_sm_chauthtok(): yppasswd_local(): failed to connect to rpc.yppasswdd: .xxx.xxx.xxx: RPC: Program not registered This means that rpc.yppasswdd isn't running on

Re: build flags for a 386DX (5.1)

2003-06-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As I indicated, my only hangup is that I'm not familiar enough with the new GCC 3 build procedures to know where to put the -march and/or -mcpu flags for a buildworld on a separate (newer) machine. Put CPUTYPE?=i386 in /etc/make.conf and rebuild

buildkernel error in 5.1_RELEASE

2003-06-13 Thread Rob B
I have downloaded the 5.1-RELEASE source via sysinstall and while world build fine, I have this error when trying to compile a new kernel from the downloaded source on Alpha: cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=ev45 -mieee -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: buildkernel error in 5.1_RELEASE

2003-06-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:06:16AM +1000, Rob B wrote: linking kernel init_main.o: In function `proc0_init': init_main.o(.text+0x424): undefined reference to `kse0_sched' init_main.o(.text+0x430): undefined reference to `ksegrp0_sched' init_main.o(.text+0x43c): undefined reference to

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small

2003-06-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, John Hay wrote: On a 5.1-RELEASE machine I have been able to cause a panic like this: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 28610560 total allocated The machine is an old 300MHz Celeron with 64M Ram. I get the panic by un-taring a huge .tgz file onto a vinum

Re: bluetooth 20030604 and 5.1 release

2003-06-13 Thread User Toyboy
Hello again, all information you have given me has been very helpful. ButI have messed up somewhere while setting up the rcfomm_pppd section and I don't know where the problem is. I have setup my ppp.conf like this: default: nat enable yes set ifaddr 192.168.0.1/0 192.168.0.2/0

rarpd broken on 64bit big endien machines (i.e. sparc64)

2003-06-13 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Ok, I just tried to net boot an Ultra 2 from another sparc box, and rarpd is broken. It is still using u_long to represent the IPv4 addresses. Attached is a patch that switches from u_long to in_addr_t. I have confirmed that this works on both sparc64 (5.1-R) and x86 (4.7-R). Comments? --

Re: bluetooth 20030604 and 5.1 release

2003-06-13 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello, --- User Toyboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello again, all information you have given me has been very helpful. ButI have messed up somewhere while setting up the rcfomm_pppd section and I don't know where the problem is. I have setup my ppp.conf like this: [section skipped] please

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 14:53:07 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: This isn't a bug report. The mail server I am writing this from, and the laptop I am using to log into it from; are running with a stock world and I can't repeat your problem. Exact

VIA C3

2003-06-13 Thread David Yeske
Anyone have a VIA C3? I'm running FreeBSD current on one and I don't see any gcc flags for the VIA C3. I think it has MMX and 3dnow, but it does not have SSE? I was wondering what gcc flags other VIA C3 users are using on FreeBSD. I am not sure what optimizations are safe for this cpu running

Re: rpc.yppasswdd failed in FreeBSD 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Lin, Tsung Ching
¦b ??, 2003-06-14 04:08, Dan Nelson ¼g¹D¡G In the last episode (Jun 13), Lin, Tsung Ching said: hello, I setup a NIS Master in FreeBSD 5.1 release, and it works. I also startup rpc.yppasswdd. When I wnat to change a user's passwd using yppasswd, it failed. root# passwd testuser

Re: rpc.yppasswdd failed in FreeBSD 5.1

2003-06-13 Thread Lin, Tsung Ching
¦b ??, 2003-06-14 06:54, Dag-Erling Smorgrav ¼g¹D¡G Lin, Tsung Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: passwd: pam_chauthtok(): error in service module Jun 13 22:22:24 abcb passwd: in pam_sm_chauthtok(): yppasswd_local(): failed to connect to rpc.yppasswdd: .xxx.xxx.xxx: RPC: Program not

Freebsd 4.7 to 5.1 buildworld failed! (fwd)

2003-06-13 Thread Alejandro Ayala
Hello, I did a cvsup and retrieved tag=RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE. Then try to buildworld and got this error. :/usr/src# make buildworld Running test variables PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches. Running test targets PASS: Test targets detected no regression. Running test

Freebsd 4.7 to 5.1 buildworld failed!

2003-06-13 Thread Alejandro Ayala
Hello, I did a cvsup and retrieved tag=RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE. Then try to buildworld and got this error. :/usr/src# make buildworld Running test variables PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches. Running test targets PASS: Test targets detected no regression. Running test

Re: Freebsd 4.7 to 5.1 buildworld failed! (fwd)

2003-06-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:03:34PM +, Alejandro Ayala wrote: At first I was getting the libpthread error everyone seems to be getting but now I got this error(after i removed /usr/src and /usr/obj, and cvsup using HEAD). Can someone please point me in the right direction. Have you read

bootpd also broke :(

2003-06-13 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Well, my further diving into netbooting an Ultra 2 I have found that bootpd doesn't do select too well. It doesn't use fd_set or anything which for some reason causes it not to function on Sparc. A simple switch to using FD_* makes it function. I have also fixed a couple comments that NetBSD

USB locks on laptops.

2003-06-13 Thread David Gilbert
While I thought it might be an isolated example, I have several laptops ... all of which lock up their ports when usb devices are connected. Typical messages include: usb3: unrecoverable error, controller halted and usb3: device problem, disabling port 3 ... which is an example from a new

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-06-13 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-14 04:00:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-06-14 04:00:15 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-14 04:03:14 - building world TB --- cd

Re: vinum and/or geom panic on alpha

2003-06-13 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 10 June 2003 at 14:05:11 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: fatal kernel trap: Stopped at g_dev_strategy+0x44:stq t0,0x20(v0) 0x20 t0=0x1a61da400,v0=0x0 db trace g_dev_strategy() at g_dev_strategy+0x44 launch_requests() at launch_requests+0x390 prologue botch:

LoR with buf system caused by pcm

2003-06-13 Thread Nate Lawson
Looks like my mp3 playback tried to acquire UFS lockmgr lock with the pcm lock held. Also, got a LoR w/ Giant through a page not present trap. Only the backtrace() is hand-transcribed due to it not being in dmesg. My system appears to be working fine and there was no crash. dmesg - pcm0: