Shawn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:21, Terry Lambert wrote:
You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary
format changed For No Good Reason(tm).
Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be more ABI compliant
with the 'standard'?
I will believe that when they
Shawn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 01:42, Terry Lambert wrote:
I do know that even if they remove the bridge, they are unlikely
to provide enough documentation to boot and run natively on the
hardware without having IBM code setting up the bus arbitration
and other bits that are currently
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
It is simply swapping when it shouldn't.
Opening Mozilla, Opera, Netscape, DrJava, jEdit, Emacs, PrBoom, XBubbles,
and Nautilus at the same time on a 233Mhz machine should fill up the memory
(160Mb) but instead it has decided to use the swap disk for a measly 50Mb
TB --- 2003-07-26 05:34:55 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2003-07-26 05:34:55 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 05:36:55 - building world
TB --- cd
geeze terry would you mind unhijacking this topic?
The topic is
Should we have an suptr() and fuptr() to match suword() and fuword()?
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
[tonnes of absolutly irrelevant stuff]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
dude, I have a third of my memory free!!
Dude, there's a difference between free and available.
Dude, what makes you think that the swap in use doesn't refer
to pages that are also in main memory, but marked clean because
they've already been written to a backing store,
after cvsup'd from 5.0R to 5.1R and get error at installworld
thx any info.
c++ -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DIN_GLIBCPP_V3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++
-I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++
-I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/gcc
Julian Elischer wrote:
geeze terry would you mind unhijacking this topic?
The topic is
Should we have an suptr() and fuptr() to match suword() and fuword()?
I'm not the one who posted the question without changing the
subject line; please read the thread history.
In answer to your
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
That's a very interesting question.
Which might get answered since some industrious folks aligned with a
certain other open source operating system are in the process of
If your system is spending a lot of time moving data to and from swap when
it is not memory-starved, or if it is stalling memory allocations that it
should be able to fulfill from free RAM, that's a concern.
That is exactly it. I emphaises th words when it is not memory-starved .
It isn't
I've spent the last couple of days tracking down a problem starting X
on a Dell Inspiron 5100. I've got as far as discovering that the
video BIOS is not being completely mapped: it's 60 kB long, but only
48 kB are being mapped into memory. To make matters worse, the
machine doesn't have a serial
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ahmed Al-Hindawi writes
:
If your system is spending a lot of time moving data to and from swap when
it is not memory-starved, or if it is stalling memory allocations that it
should be able to fulfill from free RAM, that's a concern.
That is exactly it. I emphaises
TB --- 2003-07-26 06:37:48 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-07-26 06:37:48 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 06:39:54 - building world
TB --- cd
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:08:29AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
In answer to your question, my answer is still:
How do you intend to deal with 32 and 64 bit address spaces
on the same machine, if all you have is one function for the
copyin and one for the copyout?.
Or is there no
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 05:32:17PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Can anybody point me in the right direction? Where should I be
looking for this? Is this memory mapped permanently, or is it only
during X startup?
The video BIOS is usually mapped by system BIOS into real memory to
begin
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 9:41:14 +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 05:32:17PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Can anybody point me in the right direction? Where should I be
looking for this? Is this memory mapped permanently, or is it only
during X startup?
The
TB --- 2003-07-26 08:07:23 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2003-07-26 08:07:23 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 08:12:23 - building world
TB --- cd
TB --- 2003-07-26 09:35:30 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-07-26 09:35:30 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 09:38:05 - building world
TB --- cd
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:22:00 -0700
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be more ABI compliant
with the 'standard'?
I will believe that when they upgrade their FORTRAN compiler
to be more compliant with 'the standard'.
Some standards
Le Saturday 26 July 2003 00:46, John a écrit :
.
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/freebsd-native.h:62:25: attempt to use
poisoned malloc /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/freebsd-native.h:63:25:
attempt to use poisoned calloc
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/freebsd-native.h:64:25: attempt to
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:57:04PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
Hi all
I have made a liveCD of FreeBSD Current and it boot's and looks like it
run ok..
The only problem i am haveing is with the md system.. it
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:32:40PM +1000, Mark Sergeant wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 21:09, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:57:04PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
Hi all
I have made
TB --- 2003-07-26 10:52:27 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-07-26 10:52:27 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 10:54:34 - building world
TB
thanks for all the help guys,
I appreciate it. And sorry for using the word dude; I got a little
agitated because people always expact them selves to be superior than
youself because you are the one asking the question and they are answering!!
Thanks anyway
Hi,
Is there any way to disable ISAPNP from probing in -CURRENT short of
writing a patch to do so? It is causing some delay when booting Bochs.
Thanks
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
That's a very interesting question.
Which might get answered since some industrious folks aligned with a
certain other open source
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my FreeBSD5.0 server to FreeBSD current. My
make buildworld fails with the current CVS checkout during stage
3: cross tools. I use a GENERIC kernel on i386 and I followed the
procedure as described in the FreeBSD handbook.
Can anybody give me a clue how to fix this? Is
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote:
:
: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: : Can they now take they took relevant steps as a defence in a law court?
:
: That's a very interesting question.
:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:22:00PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Shawn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:21, Terry Lambert wrote:
You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary
format changed For No Good Reason(tm).
Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The reason I keep saying that is that nobody knows for sure. Nobody
: has reverse engineered anything, got sued and won (or lost). Just
However, there are one or two cases that are close to relevant working
TB --- 2003-07-26 16:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-07-26 16:00:01 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 16:02:27 - building world
TB --- cd
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: machine doesn't have a serial port, so I can't apply a kernel debugger
: to find out what's going on.
Does it have a firewire port?
Warner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello my name is David a i read your message with interest because i have a
mandrake linux distribution who don't want to be installed with my sil 0680
PCI card and i don't know if it exists a driver for this one
can you say me how you can make boot your system under linux with your card,
please
TB --- 2003-07-26 17:22:27 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2003-07-26 17:22:27 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 17:24:28 - building world
TB --- cd
Now, it has been fixed today with the new 6.2.040 patch.
Cheers,
Mezz
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:24:30 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:50 +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:14, David O'Brien wrote:
I'm
TB --- 2003-07-26 18:24:57 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-07-26 18:24:57 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 18:26:55 - building world
TB --- cd
Hi all,
I'm seeing the same 'kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: X total
allocated'
messages that a few other have reported.
Now, I understand that setting kern.vm.kmem.size larger is supposed to
help, but I'm using a 128M Celeron-650 i386 system with no unusual
devices (expect perhaps a
the following script starts psql without problems on 4.8 with linux base
6. with 5.1 and linux base 7 it looks like su hangs. scripts doenst
complete and ends with tty output stopped.
there is also something very strange: when starting pervasive in
forground mode i get a listener and it works.
A backtrace: (where and where full) for those who can decipher them
uma_core.c seems to have been the trigger.
(kgdb) where
#0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:240
#1 0xc032cc4c in boot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:372
#2 0xc032cfd7 in panic () at
Mark Blackman writes:
I'm seeing the same 'kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: X total
allocated'
messages that a few other have reported.
[snip]
From these symptoms, I'm speculating that one or more device drivers
are producing kernel memory leaks and either triggering the
Hi
Has anyone manage to load ver 5.x into the Compaq Presario 1370
notebook. I get kernel panic all the time
Regards
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
TB --- 2003-07-26 19:57:59 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2003-07-26 19:57:59 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 20:01:00 - building world
TB --- cd
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:18:01PM +, Dave Johnson wrote:
Hi
Has anyone manage to load ver 5.x into the Compaq Presario 1370
notebook. I get kernel panic all the time
Regards
Yes.
--
Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services *
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote this message on Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 10:04 +0200:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ahmed Al-Hindawi writes
Programs like cp(1) uses mmap(2) to copy things, so if you cp(1) a big
file, it is not uncommon for some programs to end up on swap. Until they
Only for files up to
TB --- 2003-07-26 22:56:58 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-07-26 22:56:58 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-26 22:58:54 - building world
TB
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:27:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
machine doesn't have a serial port, so I can't apply a kernel debugger
to find out what's going on.
Does it have a firewire port?
Yes.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:27:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: machine doesn't have a serial port, so I
I'm getting a wrong MD5 signature when downloading the miniinst image from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.1
Also, and this is really weird, the file sizes I see on a web browser are
different than what I get with a FTP client. Yes, I realize this is a
FTP URL but still,
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 18:44:43 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:27:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL
Dan Pelleg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm getting a wrong MD5 signature when downloading the miniinst image from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.1
Sorry, false alarm. This is just the plain-ol' ASCII transfer nonsense.
I did not expect fetch to trip me like this. Sorry
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 18:44:43 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:27:06 -0600,
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 19:47:50 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 18:44:43 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:45:10PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
These issues have been addressed in KDE 3.1.3 if you're patient enough
for Will to work out the kinks the ports will be updated in a week or
less.
The issue is not KDE related one, rather the base c++ headers trigger all
sorts
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Presuming that it's the ROM driver, I get this in the dmesg I posted:
: pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum
That's likely the problem. However, PnP BIOS information isn't the
same thing that the orm[sic]
Have you not been reading the mailing list? Right now you are
supposed to WERROR if you run into these.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Well, I had compiled options DDB into the kernel and today the kernel
panic'd... here is what I got. I ran the following in the db prompt.
trace, show reg, ps. Let me know if this is the kind of information
you need, and if there is anything else I need to provide... can I
re-compile the kernel
TB --- 2003-07-27 04:00:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-07-27 04:00:02 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-27 04:01:59 - building world
TB --- cd
Hopefully PHK has a chance to look this one over, but if anyone else
has any thoughts I'll take any opinions I can get. ;)
I was looking over the 5.2 TODO and got curious as to the changes
intended for GBDE to allow integration into the fstab / boot-time mount
procedure. Unfortunately I have a
59 matches
Mail list logo