Re: Synaptics PS/2 TouchPad

2003-11-14 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2003-11-14 11:24:07 (+1030), Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:54, Philip Paeps wrote: I've recently started work on getting psm to support Synaptics TouchPads more fully: virtual scrollbars, up/down buttons, multiple finger detection, etc. I have

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Matt Smith
Marco Wertejuk wrote: Just for a short note: cfsd (ports/security/cfs) should be recompiled as well after those statfs changes. And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) postfix did this every time it received a mail until I recompiled it: pid 4049 (smtpd), uid 1003:

Re: making a release

2003-11-14 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:18:05AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: Scott Long wrote: I use the following all of the time: cd /usr/src/release ; make release BUILDNAME=5.1-CURRENT CHROOTDIR=/usr/release CVSROOT=/usr/ncvs Quick question: is it ok to do make -jn release ? No, it's not. But

Teach '-m' option of bsdlabel(8) to sunlabel(8)

2003-11-14 Thread Makoto Matsushita
I'd like to try to bulid FreeBSD/sparc64 on i386 box, but due to the lack of bsdlabel(8)'s '-m' option (set machine archtecture) on sunlabel(8), newfs(8) cannot work. Question: Anybody working on teaching '-m' option to sunlabel(8)? -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita

Re: Teach '-m' option of bsdlabel(8) to sunlabel(8)

2003-11-14 Thread Makoto Matsushita
Self followup... matusita I'd like to try to bulid FreeBSD/sparc64 on i386 box, but matusita due to the lack of bsdlabel(8)'s '-m' option (set machine matusita archtecture) on sunlabel(8), newfs(8) cannot work. I'm confused something. The fact that newfs(8) on i386 cannot newfs a filesystem

Re: xscreensaver bug?

2003-11-14 Thread Terry Lambert
Craig Boston wrote: Absolutely worst case, the root user could log in remotely, gdb your screen saver, type foobar as the password, and then hack the authentication function return value to say yes, that's the correct password for [EMAIL PROTECTED], and get in without needing to have

Re: Unattended reboot was Re: signal 12's everywhere on Currentwith update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/11/13 14:02), Eric Anderson wrote: I'm not having any luck - I'm started to feel like I'm missing something here :) I cvsup'd yesterday afternoon, and did my usual make buildworld, kernel, install kernel, single user mode, then make installworld - except it bombed on the

Re: xscreensaver bug?

2003-11-14 Thread Terry Lambert
Eugene M. Kim wrote: Terry Lambert wrote: I'm new in FreeBSD. I found that after I lock screen with xscreensaver, I can unlock it with the root's password as well as my normal user's password. I don't think it is a good thing. Is it a bug? It is intentional, although you can eliminate it

interruptNG/ataNG breaks laptop boot.

2003-11-14 Thread Ian Freislich
Hi I have a rather old Dell laptop that I'd like to run current on. A few months back current booted, but the PCIC stuff was broken so I had to back out. I thought I'd give it another try this week. After it probes the disk and GEOM does some stuff it stops responding to keyboard with the

Fwd: propgagate_priority() crashes: recursive msleep() ??

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
(Aplogies if this message is a duplicate: The original is AWOL for quite a while now) Hi, I'm getting a crash in propagate priority, as mentioned by a few people recently. Bug reports and comments about it seemed to have dropped off, so given that I can reliably reproduce it, I was trying to

using HEAD's /etc/rc.d/jail on RELENG_5_1

2003-11-14 Thread Joan Picanyol
Hi, I'd like get the enhancements of version 1.6 of /etc/rc.d/jail in RELENG_5_1, but I need some help/clarification: 1.- Is there any know pitfall? 2.- What's the safest easiest way to do it? assuming the answer to 2.- is patch your source and upgrade 3.- What's the one liner to create the

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jonathan Fosburgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background but I see every new object file in form of a picture freeze. Also every other disk access seems to block

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: ...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of

Re: Unattended reboot was Re: signal 12's everywhere on Currentwith update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Eric Anderson
Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/11/13 14:02), Eric Anderson wrote: I'm not having any luck - I'm started to feel like I'm missing something here :) I cvsup'd yesterday afternoon, and did my usual make buildworld, kernel, install kernel, single user mode, then make installworld - except it

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Brent Jones
If this is true, perhaps the build man page should be updated. Here's what the man page has to say on the topic: The ``approved'' method of updating your system from the latest sources is: make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO make

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brent Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : If this is true, perhaps the build man page should be updated. : Here's what the man page has to say on the topic: : : The ``approved'' method of updating your system from the latest : sources : is:

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Richard Coleman
Someone just needs to bring the build(7) man page up to date with the handbook. Also, I noticed that build(7) still lists the installmost build target. I believe that was removed. I would file a PR except that my man pages always suck. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brent Jones wrote: If

RE: Fwd: propgagate_priority() crashes: recursive msleep() ??

2003-11-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Nov-2003 Peter Edwards wrote: (Aplogies if this message is a duplicate: The original is AWOL for quite a while now) Hi, I'm getting a crash in propagate priority, as mentioned by a few people recently. Bug reports and comments about it seemed to have dropped off, so given that I

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Edmund L. Wong
Could someone bring me up to speed on this thread? I just joined current and I also updated this morning and have all kinds of issues. THanks, Ed --- Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone just needs to bring the build(7) man page up to date with the handbook. Also, I noticed

Ultra5 ATA issues

2003-11-14 Thread Doug White
Move to -current and drop wilko. On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: Jesper Skriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good! Maybe you can fix -current on them :)

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Richard Coleman
Sure. I can do that. Some structures in statfs changed size. So you need to rebuild and install your kernel before you update the world. The instructions in the handbook should work just fine. 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel KERNCONF=NAME_OF_KERNEL_FILE 3. make installkernel

Re: Ultra5 ATA issues

2003-11-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I replaced the default seagate with a Maxtor, but I don't have to demote to PIO on 5.1-REL. I'll try disabling DMA on it today. i'm also trying to iterate ata-lowlevel.c to see if I can find a specific break point. 45 minute kernel compiles don't help.

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Edmund L. Wong
Thanks Richard. So unfortunately, I was an idiot and ran installworld without rebuilding and installing a new kernel (the one I have was built on Nov. 1). Now everything coredumps, including rm, ls, etc. I cannot make installworld, installkernel, buildworld or buildkernel. I am able to get

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Edmund L. Wong ]-- | | I am able to get myself to a single-user prompt as | root, but not much else. Does anyone have any | suggestions as to how I can salvage this? Or will I | have to reinstall anew? Boot from a live/fixit CD/floppy, and mount your drives and

Re: Teach '-m' option of bsdlabel(8) to sunlabel(8)

2003-11-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 06:07:17PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: Self followup... matusita I'd like to try to bulid FreeBSD/sparc64 on i386 box, but matusita due to the lack of bsdlabel(8)'s '-m' option (set machine matusita archtecture) on sunlabel(8), newfs(8) cannot work. I'm

Re: Fwd: propgagate_priority() crashes: recursive msleep() ??

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
John Baldwin wrote: On 14-Nov-2003 Peter Edwards wrote: (Aplogies if this message is a duplicate: The original is AWOL for quite a while now) Hi, I'm getting a crash in propagate priority, as mentioned by a few people recently. Bug reports and comments about it seemed to have dropped off,

pcm audio problems

2003-11-14 Thread Guido Falsi
Hi! I'm running a very recent -current(13 november) and am having problems with audio. I;m running on a Gigabyte 7VM400M Mother board, the boot message about pcm is the following: pcm0: VIA VT8235 port 0xe400-0xe4ff irq 11 at device 17.5 on pci0 pcm0: Avance Logic ALC650 AC97 Codec This has

Re: Unattended reboot was Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread masta
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm building new kernels as I write this. My next question is: One of the machines I'm building on is remote and was last rebuilt just before the change. What would be be better sequence for making the change after a fresh cvsup ?

exclusive sleep mutex sigacts

2003-11-14 Thread Steve Kargl
John, I believe you've already seen the assertion fire, so this may be redundant info: kernel: checking stopevent 2 with the following non-sleepable \ locks held: kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sigacts r = 0 (0xc4a25aa8) locked \ locked @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_trap.c:260 Note the assertation

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: ...my sparc machine reports

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background but I see every new object file in form of a picture

Re: Unattended reboot was Re: signal 12's everywhere on Currentwith update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Eric Anderson wrote: I'm not having any luck - I'm started to feel like I'm missing something here :) I ended up at a very similar stage that you are in. I then did: cp /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/install /usr/bin/install chmod 555 /usr/bin/install cd /usr/src/bin/sh make install cd

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: ...my sparc machine

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jonathan Fosburgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote: This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you give me an example including what applications you're running and what you're compiling? I haven't tried

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-11-14 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-14 19:41:58 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-14 19:41:58 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-11-14 19:41:58 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:33:06 + From: Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marco Wertejuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match Marco Wertejuk wrote: Just for a short note: cfsd

Re: HEADSUP: if_xname changes incoming

2003-11-14 Thread Janet Sullivan
Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:27:35AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: I will be commiting the if_xname changes momentairly. If you experience any problems with this commit, please let me know ASAP. I'll send an all clear once I've sucessfully built a world/kernel from CVS.

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kirk McKusick writes: And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) ... This is why we make this change now so that it will be in place for the masses when 5.2 is released :-) Can't we bump the libc version so that dynamically linked, non-system binaries can

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:33:06AM +, Matt Smith wrote: Marco Wertejuk wrote: Just for a short note: cfsd (ports/security/cfs) should be recompiled as well after those statfs changes. And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) postfix did this every time it

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote: This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you give me an example including what applications you're running

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Matt Smith
Bruce Cran wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:33:06AM +, Matt Smith wrote: Marco Wertejuk wrote: Just for a short note: cfsd (ports/security/cfs) should be recompiled as well after those statfs changes. And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) postfix did this every

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Kirk McKusick writes: And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) ... This is why we make this change now so that it will be in place for the masses when 5.2 is released :-) Can't we bump the libc version so

Re: xscreensaver bug?

2003-11-14 Thread Eugene M. Kim
Terry Lambert wrote: Eugene M. Kim wrote: Terry Lambert wrote: I'm new in FreeBSD. I found that after I lock screen with xscreensaver, I can unlock it with the root's password as well as my normal user's password. I don't think it is a good thing. Is it a bug? It is intentional, although you

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Daniel Eischen writes: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Kirk McKusick writes: And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far) ... This is why we make this change now so that it will be in place for the masses when 5.2 is

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-11-14 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-14 21:11:44 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-14 21:11:44 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-11-14 21:11:44 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-11-14 21:50 +, Matt Smith wrote: The only thing I've found a problem with so far is postfix as I've mentioned. Matt. While attempting a portupgrade of postfix, I realized ruby core dumps after the statfs stuff too (even after I rebuilt it). I'm a bit puzzled, anyone else

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without the knowledge of the underlying filesystem on

Re: HEADSUP: if_xname changes incoming

2003-11-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0700, Janet Sullivan wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:27:35AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: I will be commiting the if_xname changes momentairly. If you experience any problems with this commit, please let me know ASAP. I'll send an

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Munish Chopra wrote: On 2003-11-14 21:50 +, Matt Smith wrote: The only thing I've found a problem with so far is postfix as I've mentioned. While attempting a portupgrade of postfix, I realized ruby core dumps after the statfs stuff too (even after I rebuilt

upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

2003-11-14 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hi :) I just upgraded with cvsup to CURRENT. I read UPDATING to make sure I would have no problem, but maybe I misunerstood something. Here is what I did: $ cvsup blablabla... $ make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL make install kernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL $ reboot (in single user mode) $ make

Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-14 Thread Josef Karthauser
I've been a bit out of touch with developments recently. I was wondering whether it's possible to mirror root partitions across two drives yet? I seem to remember that this was something that geom could help with, but I've no idea as to whether it's a reality yet. Does anyone know? Joe --

Re: Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josef Karthauser writes: I've been a bit out of touch with developments recently. I was wondering whether it's possible to mirror root partitions across two drives yet? I seem to remember that this was something that geom could help with, but I've no idea as to

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-11-14 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-14 22:16:37 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-14 22:16:37 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-11-14 22:16:37 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-14 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:09:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josef Karthauser writes: I've been a bit out of touch with developments recently. I was wondering whether it's possible to mirror root partitions across two drives yet? I seem to remember that

Re: Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josef Karthauser writes: I've got a machine with two drives 120gb drives, which is going to a colo. If I configure it to use one drive, will I at some point be able to remotely reconfigure it to say use the second drive as a mirror as the physical layer, i.e. if the

Re: Teach '-m' option of bsdlabel(8) to sunlabel(8)

2003-11-14 Thread Makoto Matsushita
brooks I don't think you can because our UFS on disk format is byte brooks order dependent. Someone probalby needs to import the NetBSD brooks endien-independence stuff. My friends told me that I can do with a help of geom_sunlabel, and it's right. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Sascha Holzleiter
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 22:46, Bruce Cran wrote: Either the new statfs, or something in a recent change in -CURRENT (since last week), has broken the nvidia driver. I've been using it now for over half a year with no problems at all. I installed the new kernel and world, rebuilt

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
Richard Coleman wrote: 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel KERNCONF=NAME_OF_KERNEL_FILE 3. make installkernel KERNCONF=NAME_OF_KERNEL_FILE 4. shutdown -r now 5. boot into single user mode 6. fsck -p 7. mount -u / 8. mount -a -t ufs 9. swapon -a 9.5 adjkerntz -i 10. make

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread peter . edwards
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without the knowledge of the underlying filesystem on

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 5:26 PM -0500 11/14/03, Robert Watson wrote: As soon as you recompile libc, applications expecting the old statfs() ABI get the new statfs(), and depending on where their smaller struct statfs is located, may stomp on memory they're using for something else (like critical data structures). But

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:46:19 +0100, Sascha Holzleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 22:46, Bruce Cran wrote: Either the new statfs, or something in a recent change in -CURRENT (since last week), has broken the nvidia driver. I've been using it now for over half a year with no

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-11-14 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-14 23:17:16 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-14 23:17:16 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-11-14 23:17:16 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: panic on mount_cd9660

2003-11-14 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
As of yesterday's sources, this panic is precisely the same. Actually, it can be triggered by simply running cdcontrol -f acdX info with 2 different audio CDs in a row. And it doesn't happen with ATAPICAM devices cdX. GDB session transcript attached. On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Pav Lucistnik wrote:

NFSv4 Client code committed.

2003-11-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
The Citi project over at the University of Michegan has been nice enough to provide us with an initial implementation of a NFSv4 client. We still need locking, delegations and cypto. If anyone who's crypto friendly wants to help with the integration that would be really useful. Please email me.

Re: Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-14 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:32:10AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josef Karthauser writes: I've got a machine with two drives 120gb drives, which is going to a colo. If I configure it to use one drive, will I at some point be able to remotely reconfigure it to

exclusive sleep mutex ... /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:293

2003-11-14 Thread Cosmin Stroe
Hello, I'm getting the following messages on my console with a compile from today's (Nov 14, 2003) sources: Nov 14 19:38:26 syslogd: /var/log/debug.log: No such file or directory Nov 14 19:38:26 cosmin syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel checking stopevent 2 with the following

Two processes with PID == 0

2003-11-14 Thread Munehiro Matsuda
Hi all, I have wierd problem with -current from Fri Nov 14 19:58:02 JST and with SCHED_4BSD scheduler. There are two processes that have the same PID as 0!! Here's snippest from 'ps axl' output: UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS MWCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND 0 0 0 0 -16

Re: NFSv4 Client code committed.

2003-11-14 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: NFSv4 shares some code with nfs2 and nfs3, and required some minor modifications of the v2 and v3 sources so let me know if you experience breakage. I'm getting this on buildworld: === usr.bin/fstat cc -O -pipe

Re: NFSv4 Client code committed.

2003-11-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031114 20:00] wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: NFSv4 shares some code with nfs2 and nfs3, and required some minor modifications of the v2 and v3 sources so let me know if you experience breakage. I'm getting

Re: signal 12's everywhere on Current with update this morning.

2003-11-14 Thread Richard Coleman
Andy Farkas wrote: Richard Coleman wrote: 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel KERNCONF=NAME_OF_KERNEL_FILE 3. make installkernel KERNCONF=NAME_OF_KERNEL_FILE 4. shutdown -r now 5. boot into single user mode 6. fsck -p 7. mount -u / 8. mount -a -t ufs 9. swapon -a 9.5 adjkerntz -i Yep,

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-11-14 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-15 05:00:01 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-15 05:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-11-15 05:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

ATAng 'mode PIO4' to 'mode ???' regression

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
-current (cvsup'd about 3 hours ago) doesn't like my ATA disk anymore :( 5.1-RELEASE says (during 'boot -v'): ata0: pre reset mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=00 ata0-master: ATAPI 00 00 ata0-slave: ATAPI 00 00 ata0: after reset mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=00 ata0-master: ATA 01 a5 ata0: devices=01 ata0 at

checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
Help! These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: ... Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: checking stopevent 2 with the following non-sleepable locks held: Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sigacts r = 0 (0xc4656aa8) locked @

EISA AHA panic (ISRng related)

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
My EISA AHA2740's don't work no more :( If I 'dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null' with -CURRENT cvsup'd a few hours ago, I get this panic: ... kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at intr_execute_handlers+0x23: lock addl%eax,0(%edx) db where

console freezes

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
When messages are sent to console rapidly, console becomes unavailable :( My previous email complains of messages being spewed to the console. These messages stop after a few minutes and the console is dead. On another box of mine, same thing happens. Different messages get spewed to console

dc still reporting collisions

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
The dc(4) driver is still reporting collisions on 100 Mbit full-duplex links: grep dc0 /var/run/dmesg.boot dc0: Macronix 98715/98715A 10/100BaseTX port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xfbfdf000-0xfbfdf0ff irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:00:e8:89:b9:66 miibus0: MII bus on dc0

Re: Radeon 7500 w/ DRI locking on restart of X

2003-11-14 Thread Sean Welch
Eric, I updated my 5.1-RELEASE system to CURRENT dated today at approx. 9:10 CDT to give your changes a try. I had a bit of a fright at first with kernel panics right at the end of the boot sequence but it turned out I had forgotten to disable the ltmdm code -- the kernel module compiled under