No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here. We have never
enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration
before. This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too.
Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default is a bad idea.
On the other hand, I
On 04/04/10 23:01, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here. We have never
enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration
before. This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too.
Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default is
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4bb95564.1070...@freebsd.org:
do On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
do Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
doin 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
do
do ob The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
do ob see no
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:42:52PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4bb7e224.6020...@freebsd.org:
do As we've discussed previously, you and I have a lot of disagreement on
do some of these principles. I'm going to outline my responses in some
do detail,
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
what needs to be
I think it's clear at this point that you and I have some pretty serious
disagreements about how this thing should look. I think that's
unfortunate, since you have a lot of good ideas, I just think some of
them are wrong. :) Seriously though, I hope we can find a way to come to
agreement.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for
On 04/04/10 22:42, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4bb7e224.6020...@freebsd.org:
If people want to disable IPv6 GUA assignment in per-AF manner, it
should be done by per-AF global knobs for $ifconfig_* because the GUA
assignment involves $ifconfig_* knobs only
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4bb95564.1070...@freebsd.org:
do On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
do Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
doin 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
do
do ob The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
do ob see no
On 04/05/2010 00:21, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:13:40 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
in 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
Gentlemen,
I think this is converging on a good,
John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote
in 20100405083056.ga8...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za:
jh These questions actually start more questions for me. :-) Maybe we should
jh also think from the user perspective and list a few use cases and what a
jh user need to put in rc.conf to make that work?
jh
jh
Hi,
the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g.
KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches
(say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat layer for top/ps/).
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, jhell wrote:
Hi,
reading the thread in thread view I had wondered why your reply had
been ignored until I realized that it was the last to come in. So
I'll use it to reply to, especially as I like it.
I have no idea (unless I'll read them) about the guts of various shell
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:00:54PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Hi,
It seems that fxp(4) has a long standing races between controller
and driver. The exotic RFD handling of controller is race prone as
we had seen old ethernet controllers. I could easily reproduce this
by rebooting system
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:45:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:45:08 -
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc
-I. -I/src/sys
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
In file included from /src/sys/fs/coda/coda_fbsd.c:49:
/src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:97: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'CodaFid' /src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:199: error: expected ')' before
'*' token
Sorry all -- I'll commit a fix for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My laptop manufacturer decided not to have AHCI included in the BIOS for
this device, so I've been looking at what needs to happen in order to
make this work.
On this device, the BIOS doesn't even initialize BAR(5), so I need to
start at that point
20 matches
Mail list logo
