Rui Paulo wrote:
On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote:
Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not every
PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf -lvbc`
output in both working (Rui) and not working (Michael) cases.
ah...@pci0:0:31:2:
On 19 Apr 2010, at 07:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote:
Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not
every
PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf -
lvbc`
output in
i'm getting this error during `make buildworld`:
=== libexec/atrun (all)
clang -isystem /usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include/clang/1.5
-isystem /usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include
-B/usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/lib/
-L/usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/lib/
you have to use -O2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:29:07PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
i'm getting this error during `make buildworld`:
=== libexec/atrun (all)
clang -isystem /usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include/clang/1.5
-isystem /usr/obj/usr/local/src/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include
On 04/16/2010 09:51, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010
11:35:40 -0700):
Have you or anyone else ever used buildkernel successfully with
makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes in the conf file? Something as simple as
this does not work for me:
On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org wrote:
Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms
on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk
afterwards show
on 17/04/2010 19:31 Tim Kientzle said the following:
Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms
on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk
afterwards show nothing.
Should we allow it like linux does?
Are you claiming
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org wrote:
Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms
on
Hi
I'm testing ClangBSD in a VirtualBox client and ran into a panic on the client,
but I don't think it's clang-related. I haven't tried kernel debugging before.
I tried getting a backtrace as described in
2010/4/19 Erik Cederstrand e...@cederstrand.dk:
Hi
I'm testing ClangBSD in a VirtualBox client and ran into a panic on the
client, but I don't think it's clang-related. I haven't tried kernel
debugging before. I tried getting a backtrace as described in
On 4/19/10, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is apparently not
Roman Divacky schrieb am 2010-04-19:
you have to use -O2
thanks a lot. using -O2 worked. :)
i was also wondering: what's the reason gcc is still being used during step
Building an up-to-date make(1) and not clang?
cheers.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:29:07PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
i'm
On 04/19/2010 08:03 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/4/19 Erik Cederstrande...@cederstrand.dk:
Hi
I'm testing ClangBSD in a VirtualBox client and ran into a panic on the client,
but I don't think it's clang-related. I haven't tried kernel debugging before.
I tried getting a backtrace as
Have you seen this thread?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-April/025128.html
Quite a few fixes have gone into the -current and RELENG_8 branches.
Please try sync-up to the latest code before applying the patch.
-- Qing
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marin Atanasov
14 matches
Mail list logo
