On Monday 26 April 2010 03:01:39 Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/25/10 00:00, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 02:55:16 Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/24/10 17:54, Bruce Cran wrote:
# if_bridge doesn't have a link-local address by default, so add one
ifconfig_bridge0_ipv6=fe80::2%bridge0
Am 22.04.2010 20:43, schrieb Marin Atanasov:
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the patch, Qing!
It works fine. However I've noticed one thing, after I start mpd5 and
connect to my home network:
kernel: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
Not very sure if this is
Marius Strobl wrote:
As noted earlier, pc98 and sparc64 need ada(4)/CAM ATA to perform
geometry translation as done by ad_firmware_geom_adjust() for ad(4),
which the following patch hooks up to both:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/ata_disk_firmware_geom_adjust.diff
You preferred to
Andrew Reilly wrote:
Was this the result of the umass/da driver having a different
synthetic geometry calculation routine than the SATA driver?
ATA and SCSI disk drivers indeed have different geometry calculation
algorithms. ATA fetches geometry from DEVICE IDENTIFY data, while SCSI
seems just
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery table.
** Resolving unreferenced inode list.
** Processing journal entries.
** 0 journal records in
on 26/04/2010 16:42 dikshie said the following:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
0/0 I guess. Floating point allows that :-)
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
# kgdb -q /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VBOOK/kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.12
...
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
246 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) x/s panicstr
0xc07c2160
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie diks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery table.
** Resolving unreferenced
On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
Marius Strobl wrote:
As noted earlier, pc98 and sparc64 need ada(4)/CAM ATA to perform
geometry translation as done by ad_firmware_geom_adjust() for ad(4),
which the following patch hooks up to both:
On 4/26/10 1:11 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 22.04.2010 20:43, schrieb Marin Atanasov:
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the patch, Qing!
It works fine. However I've noticed one thing, after I start mpd5 and
connect to my home network:
kernel: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after
I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool technology.
However, before we move forward with this, we need to have a plan for
the various issues that have come up. The plan needs to be specific,
have owners for key items, warnings about ownerless == obsoleted, and
target dates.
I think
On 24 Apr 2010, at 20:42, Pegasus Mc Cleaft k...@mthelicon.com wrote:
Hello Hackers Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a
separate set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:33:27AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool technology.
However, before we move forward with this, we need to have a plan for
the various issues that have come up. The plan needs to be specific,
have owners for key
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool technology. However,
before we move forward with this, we need to have a plan for the various
issues that have come up. The plan needs to be specific, have owners for
key items, warnings about
In message: 20100426181209.gb3...@garage.freebsd.pl
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:33:27AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool technology.
: However, before we move forward with this, we need
Weongyo Jeong wrote:
The corollery is that it doesn't work first time on reboot. ??I need
to either '/etc/rc.d/netif restart' and if that panics the machine,
destroy wlan0 and then restart netif.
Then wlan0/bwn0 associates correctly with this device.
If you're a CURRENT user
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:19:46PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: 20100426181209.gb3...@garage.freebsd.pl
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:33:27AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool
On 25 apr 2010, at 09.51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 09:30:12 Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I have the newly released macbook pro 13 (7,1). (swedish keyboard) And it
seems that I have some problem with the USB-keyboard driver. The keyboard
seems to work more or less
Hello, Pawel.
You wrote 26 апреля 2010 г., 23:10:12:
You most likely got it right, I'm just saying creating separate GEOM
class for each metadata format is wrong direction. :)
Does ataraid translations and checksuming (in case of RAID5) now or
it configures chipsets only?
All these
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
Thank you for the report with stack. That was very helpful. I know how
to fix this bug but it will take me a day or two as my primary test
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling.
I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs
9-CURRENT r207195 (i386).
Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
So what is the public opinion: Is the lack of ataraid(4) fatal or we can
live without it?
Hardware mirroring is very important to me. It's the only solution I'm
aware of for realtime protection from drive failure in systems that boot
multiple
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling
23 matches
Mail list logo
