Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (from Sun, 02 May 2010 07:38:57 +0200 (CEST)): When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA. I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread Ben Kelly
On May 3, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (from Sun, 02 May 2010 07:38:57 +0200 (CEST)): When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA. I would

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread sthaug
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling, then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on. Fully agreed. I see no reason why these sould be coupled. It does not look like it is a prerequisite to have SU enabled when you want to enable SUJ. So I

exclusive sleep mutex mskc0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc32c3690) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/msk/if_msk.c:3589

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated to current yesterday and got the following 'witness_warn' panic upon executing 'reboot': suspending ithread with the following locks held: exclusive sleep mutex mskc0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc32c3690) locked @

Unable to establish HE gif0 tunnel

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated a border gateway yesterday from a Feb 23 kernel to a May 2 version kernel/world, and lost my connectivity to my gif0 HE tunnel. I've been using the following in /etc/rc.conf successfully for some time to establish the tunnel: # Hurricane

m_getjcl and packet cache

2010-05-03 Thread Fabien Thomas
Hi, I've posted on -net but in case people will have some feedback on this before commit. There is two solutions, let every driver get a test for MCLBYTES and call m_getcl (and then add support for at least igb, em, ixgbe) or integrate the fast path in m_getjcl. I've chosen to

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-03 Thread Ganbold
AK-san, PseudoCylon wrote: Thank you very much. However it still panics when I tried to use bridge. Please try this. http://gitorious.org/run/run/trees/master/dev/usb/wlan (if_run.c and if_runvar.h have been updated.) Sorry I haven't test on bridge (only with nat). It did panic

Re: ports and PBIs

2010-05-03 Thread Kris Moore
On 05/01/2010 00:29, James Butler wrote: Genuine (possibly stupid) question -in PBI land, what happens if package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start one or the other? Which one gets to claim port 631? -James Butler That is a problem we are dealing with right

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

2010-05-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:18:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: Marius Strobl wrote: As noted earlier, pc98 and sparc64 need ada(4)/CAM ATA to perform geometry translation as done by ad_firmware_geom_adjust() for ad(4), which the following

SUJ deadlock

2010-05-03 Thread Fabien Thomas
Hi Jeff, I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock. It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait. The backtrace is the following: (kgdb) bt #0 sched_switch (td=0xc52d84c0, newtd=0xc4d88980, flags=260) at

Re: ports and PBIs

2010-05-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote: On 05/01/2010 00:29, James Butler wrote: Genuine (possibly stupid) question -in PBI land, what happens if package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start one or the other? Which one gets to claim port 631?

Re: New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-05-03 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-04-28 15:44:29 (+0300), Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: I'm glad to present new driver (mvs) for several series of Marvell SATA controllers (PCI-X, PCIe and SoC-integrated), to work with CAM ATA infrastructure. Driver supports following Marvell chips: ... 88SX6042,

Re: exclusive sleep mutex mskc0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc32c3690) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/msk/if_msk.c:3589

2010-05-03 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 07:01:56AM -0700, Mark Atkinson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated to current yesterday and got the following 'witness_warn' panic upon executing 'reboot': suspending ithread with the following locks held: exclusive sleep mutex mskc0

Re: SUJ deadlock

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/03/10 12:38, Fabien Thomas wrote: Hi Jeff, I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock. It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait. I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way

Re: SUJ deadlock

2010-05-03 Thread Fabien Thomas
Hi Jeff, I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock. It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait. I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better than what I was able to garner. I was only able to tell via ctrl-t on a

Re: Unable to establish HE gif0 tunnel

2010-05-03 Thread Chris Ruiz
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated a border gateway yesterday from a Feb 23 kernel to a May 2 version kernel/world, and lost my connectivity to my gif0 HE tunnel. I've been using the following in

Re: SUJ deadlock

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote: Hi Jeff, I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock. It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait. I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better than what I was able to garner. I was

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/03/10 06:19, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling, then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on. Fully agreed. I see no reason why these sould be coupled. It does not look like it is a prerequisite to have SU enabled

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-03 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message From: Ganbold ganb...@gmail.com To: PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu ganb...@mobicom.mn Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 8:54:11 AM Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless Thanks a lot, works

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-03 Thread Ganbold
PseudoCylon wrote: - Original Message From: Ganbold ganb...@gmail.com To: PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu ganb...@mobicom.mn Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:44:20 AM Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it alone, or it will be set at install time and then not twiddled at all. :) Speaking of

Re: exclusive sleep mutex mskc0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc32c3690) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/msk/if_msk.c:3589

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
On 5/3/2010 12:55 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 07:01:56AM -0700, Mark Atkinson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated to current yesterday and got the following 'witness_warn' panic upon executing 'reboot': suspending ithread with the following

Re: Unable to establish HE gif0 tunnel

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
On 5/3/2010 1:33 PM, Chris Ruiz wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated a border gateway yesterday from a Feb 23 kernel to a May 2 version kernel/world, and lost my connectivity to my gif0 HE

Re: Unable to establish HE gif0 tunnel

2010-05-03 Thread Mark Atkinson
On 5/3/2010 6:23 PM, Mark Atkinson wrote: On 5/3/2010 1:33 PM, Chris Ruiz wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated a border gateway yesterday from a Feb 23 kernel to a May 2 version kernel/world,

Re: Unable to establish HE gif0 tunnel

2010-05-03 Thread Doug Barton
Before I forget, I can't find the key that you signed this message with on any key servers; FYI. On 05/03/10 07:16, Mark Atkinson wrote: I updated a border gateway yesterday from a Feb 23 kernel to a May 2 version kernel/world, There have been numerous changes to IPv6 related stuff, both in

Non-SUJ deadlock in -current

2010-05-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
I have updated a vmware guest to -current from about 48 hours ago to play with SUJ but before I got that far, I ran into a deadlock trying to upgrade some ports. It gets part-way through a configure and then stops. VTY switching works but none of the getty's will echo input. Ctrl-T on the active

Re: New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-05-03 Thread Alexander Motin
Kristof Provost wrote: I've done a quick test on my Orion (88F5182) based device. It seems to be working fine. It detects a SATA hard disk, reads/writes, ... I wasn't able to mount a filesystem from the disk but that could have been me. What kind of problems? Could you confirm it? --