Re: SUJ deadlock

2010-05-07 Thread Fabien Thomas
fixed/works a lot better for me. Applied and restarted portupgrade. Will tell you tomorrow. Fabien Le 6 mai 2010 à 00:54, Jeff Roberson a écrit : On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote: Hi Jeff, I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock. It seems related to

Re: Problem with reboot

2010-05-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com wrote: In message v2yda48cf211004280807r7e6089i3e0b9fef0e494...@mail.gmail.com, Dmit ry Krivenok writes: Hello! I have a trouble with my FreeBSD-CURRENT virtual machine running on VmWare ESX server. uname -a prints:

Re: Problem with reboot

2010-05-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com wrote: In message v2yda48cf211004280807r7e6089i3e0b9fef0e494...@mail.gmail.com, Dmit ry Krivenok writes: Hello! I have a trouble with my

Re: SUJ update - new panic - ffs_copyonwrite: recursive call

2010-05-07 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: Hi While 'make buildworld' kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Hi Vladimir, I checked in a fix for this at revision 207742. If you can verify that it works for you it would be appreciated. Thanks! Jeff

Re: SUJ deadlock

2010-05-07 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote: fixed/works a lot better for me. Thanks Fabien, I just committed this. Thanks everyone for the assistance finding bugs so far. Please let me know if you run into anything else. For now I don't know of any other than some feature/change requests

Re: HEADS UP: 64-bit quotas going in to head today

2010-05-07 Thread Ivan Voras
On 05/07/10 02:36, Kirk McKusick wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav and I have been working on updating the FFS quota system to support both traditional 32-bit and new 64-bit quotas (for those of you who want to put 2+Tb quotas on your users). By default quotas are not compiled into the kernel. To

Re: Revision 205728: broken bluetooth mouse support

2010-05-07 Thread Kai Wang
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:58:13AM +0400, Alex Deiter wrote: Hi, Bluetooth mouse support is broken after Revision 205728: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=205728 When I move the mouse - cursor stays in same place but moves the current position of the console.

Re: Revision 205728: broken bluetooth mouse support

2010-05-07 Thread Alex Deiter
Hi Kal, Thanks a lot for your patch! I`m apply this patch and my bt mouse work fine again! For Hans: Which daemon is driving the BT mouse? bthidd patch for bthidd(8) works fine only WITH your patches for: lib/libusbhid/data.c sys/dev/usb/usb_hid.c sys/dev/usb/usbhid.h Thanks a lot!

if_re regression on RELENG_8

2010-05-07 Thread McLone
Hell Low. When Vista finally died on my girl's notebook, she asked me to install FreeBSD on it, so no more viruses. I installed RELENG_8_0/i386, to compile fresh RELENG_8/amd64 in hopes SUJ will be availible (2gb RAM is kinda too small for ZFS). I've built custom kernel (GENERIC with unneeded

Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

2010-05-07 Thread Gustavo Perez Querol
Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to read and work email and wireless stuffs. Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP. The patch made the machine to panic.

Re: ZFS Stability MySQL (Comments Requested)

2010-05-07 Thread Eirik Øverby
Hi, just chirping in; we've upgraded a bunch of old 6.x servers to 8.0 with ZFS. This is a pair of HP DL385 G1s (dual opteron, old stuff) with SmartArray controllers, which had absolutely horrible performance in both 6.0 and 8.0. The drive array gave us ~25 mbyte/s sustained, which is

Re: if_re regression on RELENG_8

2010-05-07 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:55:02PM +0300, McLone wrote: Hell Low. When Vista finally died on my girl's notebook, she asked me to install FreeBSD on it, so no more viruses. I installed RELENG_8_0/i386, to compile fresh RELENG_8/amd64 in hopes SUJ will be availible (2gb RAM is kinda too small

PT_ATTACH resumes suspended process

2010-05-07 Thread Ben Widawsky
If a debugger attaches to a suspended process, the process will be resumed, and backgrounded. This seems like the incorrect behavior to me based what I read in the man page. The tracing process will see the newly-traced process stop and may then control it as if it had been traced all along. The

Re: if_re regression on RELENG_8

2010-05-07 Thread McLone
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: So the thing is, re0 stops working after sending any packet longer than 536 bytes. I tested via ping, -S (536-8) works, but (537-8) leads to watchdog timeout. The host cannot be software rebooted in ~80% cases after it

Re: if_re regression on RELENG_8

2010-05-07 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:53:34AM +0300, McLone wrote: On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: So the thing is, re0 stops working after sending any packet longer than 536 bytes. I tested via ping, -S (536-8) works, but (537-8) leads to watchdog timeout. The

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-07 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: Hello, I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it. I've noticed that when trying to enable a feature on a mounted filesystem tunefs gives a bogus