Hi,
On 25/05/2010 05:45, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:05:53 -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira
li...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I recently reinstalled my FreeBSD 8-STABLE box to move from
i386 to amd64. The hardware hasn't changed (except for an increase
from 4GB
Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
example:
http://www.h5l.org/releases.html
), there are patches for heimdal vulnerabilities
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:59 +, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com said:
Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
largely untouched since May 2008?
I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
components that depend on it to learn how to use either
On 06/06/10 12:32, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Beyond that, Free is one of the few UNIXen I cannot talk to (or from!)
using Kerberos for things like SSH, rlogin, rdist, etc. We're woefully
behind Solaris, Linux, even Windows, when it comes to integrated
GSSAPI/K5 SSO authentication.
... and it's
On 06/06/10 12:46, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
... and it's not going to get any better till someone steps up and
volunteers to improve it. Can we count on you?
I've brought this up at least three times over the past 10(+?) years,
and been blown off every time. So yes, I'm volunteering, again.
(And yes, this is a bit of an irony considering that I used to be the
maintainer of the base-system Kerberos code in the long-ago krb4
days. But my job requires me to administer MIT Kerberos, so I need
the MIT kadmin utility and not the Heimdal one.)
Aren't the reasons for the Heimdal
... and it's not going to get any better till someone steps up and volunteers
to improve it. Can we count on you?
I've brought this up at least three times over the past 10(+?) years, and
been blown off every time. So yes, I'm volunteering, again. Can I count on
you?
--lyndon
I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos
implementation from ports. (I'd also love for the ancient and broken
base version of libcom_err to go away -- there's no knob to turn it
off, and the shared library
Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
Jos
On Jun 6, 2010 12:28 PM, Garrett Wollman woll...@bimajority.org wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:59 +, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com said:
Is anybody planning to...
I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 01:33:10PM -0400, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD. We are going
to import clang/LLVM sources and put those into contrib/llvm
needs respective rewrite to use new features. Other
architectures are untouched, but if any of them may benefit from this
functionality - it should be possible to share most of the code.
Latest patches can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/et.20100606.patch
Known issues:
- i8254 timer
11 matches
Mail list logo
