On Sunday 05 December 2010 07:21:03 Steve Kargl wrote:
It seems some recent change (as in the last 7-10 days)
has caused an instability in wlan0. Just a small
excerpt from /var/log/messages,
Dec 4 18:54:16 laptop kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP
Dec 4 19:11:16 laptop kernel:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
From using it for a long time in OpenBSD I always found it quite stable
and easy to use.
-Pierre
___
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Maybe because everyone who cares about in-kernel uses the FreeBSD
in-kernel ng_pppoe via mpd?
From
Pierre Lamy pie...@userid.org wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
From using it for a long time in OpenBSD I always found it quite stable
and easy to use.
Have you tried netgraph-based mpd?
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:34:46AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Sunday 05 December 2010 07:21:03 Steve Kargl wrote:
It seems some recent change (as in the last 7-10 days)
has caused an instability in wlan0. Just a small
excerpt from /var/log/messages,
Dec 4 18:54:16 laptop
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Maybe because everyone who cares about in-kernel uses the FreeBSD
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:30:16PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that has broken process accounting/timing.
laptop:kargl[42] foreach i ( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 )
foreach? time ./testf
foreach? end
Max ULP: 0.501607 for x in [-18.00:88.70] with dx = 1.067100e-04
69.55 real38.39 user
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Maybe
On 12/5/10 3:18 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that has broken process accounting/timing.
laptop:kargl[42] foreach i ( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 )
foreach? time ./testf
foreach? end
Max ULP: 0.501607 for x in [-18.00:88.70] with dx = 1.067100e-04
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
as I never got around to installing mpd and it did the job.
BTW, there is a rumor that mpd may become an 'in source' program too.
Not to paraphrase the muppet show, but...
'the question is... who cares?' :
--
This e-mail was sponsored by the letters 'please
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never
FreeBSD gohorns.x 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1 r216088: Thu Dec 2
23:20:14 CST 2010 r...@gohorns.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I have been getting a lot of ts_to_ct for months: are we supposed to
look for something or report anything about these?
I just noticed an NTP error
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/5/10 3:18 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that has broken process accounting/timing.
laptop:kargl[42] foreach i ( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 )
foreach? time ./testf
foreach? end
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/5/10 3:18 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that has broken process accounting/timing.
On 12/5/10 10:19 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/5/10 3:18 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12/5/10 10:19 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/5/10 3:18 PM,
On 12/5/10 10:24 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Julian Elischerjul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12/5/10 10:19 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.eduwrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:00:32PM -0800,
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 10:24:12PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
But couldn't it be libthr changes? There have been a handful of
those that have been committed recently by davidxu.
HTH,
There is no threading involved in the application. However,
it was David's recent changes that caused
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
If you can provide the source for the application you're running
above and instructions on how to compile it, I can at least give you a
bit of a head start :).
Thanks,
-Garrett
The app is statically linked. I can give you
20 matches
Mail list logo
