All,
I have a zroot(mirror)+zmysql(raidz2) setup on a MySQL db box.
One drive failed (mfid3). We've since replaced it.
I can't for the life of me get zpool to replace it. I can't remember why
I used gpt instead of direct disks for the zmysql pool (but thats how it
is). I've tried all of the fol
On Wed Feb 2 11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
> > >
> > > 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec)
> >
> > Just curious - how
On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
> > so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
> >
> > 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec)
>
> Just curious - how will recoverdisk(1) perform? I haven't tried it
> mys
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:54:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:54:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:54:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:54:26 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:54:26 - /usr/bin/c
Hi!
> please not that this is an atapi drive, but i'm using ATA_CAM.
>
> so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
>
> 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec)
>
> ... this drive is capable of reading dvds at a speed of 16x. [1] tells me,
> that this means the enti
Pawel,
I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
-Christopher
___
freebsd-cur
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:16 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:13 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:14 - /usr/bin/c
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Alexander Best
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:54:41 +
> Message-id: <20110202195441.ga39...@freebsd.org>
Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i'd like to copy several dvds to my hdd. however my attempts so far haven't
> really been that successfull. b
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:54:41PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i'd like to copy several dvds to my hdd. however my attempts so far haven't
> really been that successfull. basically using dd(1) is just way too slow.
>
> this is my dvd drive:
>
> cd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
> so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
>
> 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec)
Just curious - how will recoverdisk(1) perform? I haven't tried it
myself but it uses m
hi there,
i'd like to copy several dvds to my hdd. however my attempts so far haven't
really been that successfull. basically using dd(1) is just way too slow.
this is my dvd drive:
cd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0
cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, AT
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 19:10:10 - /usr/bin/csu
On 2011-02-02 19:04, Konference wrote:
Is there support for new Intel H67 chipset (SATA) ?
I didn't find anything relevant on google
Maybe after Intel finishes its recall? :)
I don't think you want to use those chips...
___
freebsd-current@freeb
Hi,
Is there support for new Intel H67 chipset (SATA) ?
I didn't find anything relevant on google
Thanks for reply
Jiri///
/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
Any news or fix about this ?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
TB --- 2011-02-02 17:00:10 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 17:00:10 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-02-02 17:00:10 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 17:00:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 17:00:19 - /usr/b
TB --- 2011-02-02 16:47:17 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 16:47:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-02-02 16:47:17 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 16:47:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 16:47:27 - /usr
TB --- 2011-02-02 15:16:04 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 15:16:04 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-02-02 15:16:04 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 15:16:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 15:16:05 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-02 14:20:01 - /usr/bin/c
On 28 January 2011 15:14, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:43:38PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> That's FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (w/o debug).
>
>> It's observed for bash processes which end up in unbounded sleep
>> in [fifoow] wchan while executing the next script:
>
>> %%%
24 matches
Mail list logo