This patch is *VERY* experimental patch to implement rfc5862 which is on
the IETF standard tracks so it could be completely wrong or has a lot of
bugs on it or wrong approaches because I'm a really newbie on TCP stack.
This patch includes two features to support `Basic FRTO algorithm' and
Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
As part of work on a new installer, I would like to update the base
system dialog and libdialog to the newer one provided by Thomas Dickey
(http://invisible-island.net/dialog/, ports as devel/cdialog). This is
a much nicer, fuller featured
On Sat Feb 5 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
alex,
I think you are the kind of person to try out
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
thanks. this is the first time i hear of this project. i'll try to get it up
and running.
with fbsd :)
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:12:57PM +,
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which
On Saturday 05 February 2011 14:27:56 Donald Allen wrote:
I've discussed problems with FreeBSD and usb sata drives on this list
in the past (as recently as last September), and have given up on
FreeBSD as a result of the usb disk problems (I do my backups with usb
drives) and other usb-related
On Saturday 05 February 2011 16:18:56 Donald Allen wrote:
Does whoever is responsible for CAM/SCSI
know about this and do you know if there are plans to fix it? What is the
point of supporting USB devices (and we aren't talking about an odd-ball
device here; these are USB disks), when the
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
The attached patch is sufficient to allow a C++ program to use libzfs.
The motivation for these changes is work I'm doing on a ZFS fault
handling daemon that is written in C++. SpectraLogic's intention
is to return this work to
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.netwrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 14:27:56 Donald Allen wrote:
I've discussed problems with FreeBSD and usb sata drives on this list
in the past (as recently as last September), and have given up on
FreeBSD as a result
On 02/05/11 03:04, Anonymous wrote:
Nathan Whitehornnwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
As part of work on a new installer, I would like to update the base
system dialog and libdialog to the newer one provided by Thomas Dickey
(http://invisible-island.net/dialog/, ports as devel/cdialog). This is
On 2/5/11 8:28 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Hans Petter Selaskyhsela...@c2i.netwrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 16:18:56 Donald Allen wrote:
Does whoever is responsible for CAM/SCSI
know about this and do you know if there are plans to fix it? What is the
point
Hans Petter,
Could the USB mass storage layer not refuse to pass down some commands
and just return the proscribed error?
Yes, that's what I'm thinking would be the simplest solution. I just need an
overview which SCSI commands we should pass and not pass. Do you have an idea?
--hps
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.netwrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 16:18:56 Donald Allen wrote:
Does whoever is responsible for CAM/SCSI
know about this and do you know if there are plans to fix it? What is the
point of supporting USB devices (and we
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 14:27:56 Donald Allen wrote:
I've discussed problems with FreeBSD and usb sata drives on this list
in the past (as recently as last September), and have given up on
FreeBSD as a result of
On Saturday 05 February 2011 19:32:59 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On a more relevant topic it would also be nice if the following noise
(note the Medium not present errors) didn't end up in the syslog
every time I turned on my monitor (the monitor has built in card
readers and I rarely populate
On 2/5/2011 8:39 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
The attached patch is sufficient to allow a C++ program to use libzfs.
The motivation for these changes is work I'm doing on a ZFS fault
handling daemon that is written in C++.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 2/5/2011 8:39 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
The attached patch is sufficient to allow a C++ program to use libzfs.
The motivation for these changes is work
On 2/5/2011 3:06 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Perhaps IllumOS will accept these changes back? As I mentioned in the
change descriptions included with the patch, the header files already
show the intention of providing C++
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Justin T. Gibbs gi...@scsiguy.com wrote:
On 2/5/2011 3:06 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Perhaps IllumOS will accept these changes back? As I mentioned in the
change descriptions included with
19 matches
Mail list logo
