Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang

2011-03-14 Thread Martin Matuska
After my recent patches to HEAD not anymore. I have also a SSSE3 patch and a general gcc 4.2 update patch pending. Dňa 12.03.2011 09:42, Jakub Lach wrote / napísal(a): Core i7 based procesors run slower with -march=core2 (new option) on the system compiler than with -march=nocona Sorry

Re: ZFSv28, zfs list behaviour and sysutils/freebsd-snapshot

2011-03-14 Thread J. Hellenthal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:17, mikael.urankar@ wrote: Hi, I'm using sysutils/freebsd-snapshot to make periodic ZFS backup snapshot and this soft is broken since the upgrade of my pool to ZFSv28. After some debugging it appears that zfs list behaviour

Re: `panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long' on HP DV8

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Matthew Jacob m...@feral.com wrote: On 3/13/2011 5:03 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 04:41:58PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: Yes they are. The full messages from the failed boot would be helpful. Looks like we have ATA in CAM now, so it's

Re: ZFSv28, zfs list behaviour and sysutils/freebsd-snapshot

2011-03-14 Thread Urankar Mikael
On Mon 14 March 2011 at 02:44:16AM -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:17, mikael.urankar@ wrote: Hi, I'm using sysutils/freebsd-snapshot to make periodic ZFS backup snapshot and this soft is broken since the upgrade of my pool to ZFSv28. After some debugging it appears that

Deadlock on stable fixed on head

2011-03-14 Thread Fabien Thomas
I'm debugging a deadlock on FreeBSD that is not on head but on 7.3, 8.2... Maybe someone will have an idea on what patch fixed it. Context: 1 - On a UP machine (Multicore without SMP option or UP with SMP). 2 - When using device apic (more on this later) 3 - Using DEVICE_POLLING (more on this

Re: `panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long' on HP DV8

2011-03-14 Thread Olivier Houchard
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:01:38AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following panic trying to boot March 5 snapshot on HP Pavilion DV8 notebook (8.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel seems to boot on the same hardware just fine): run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60

HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead of sysinstall on install media. A big thank you is in order to everyone who provided advice, criticism, and testing for this project over the last few months! Along

Re: `panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long' on HP DV8

2011-03-14 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:14:31AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:01:38AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following panic trying to boot March 5 snapshot on HP Pavilion DV8 notebook (8.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel seems to boot on the same hardware

[CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment

2011-03-14 Thread Aleksandr Rybalko
Hello, all. I am pleased to present support for Ralink RT3050F/RT3052F MIPS SoC's for FreeBSD. This patches add support of 1. GPIO/Interrupt/System/UART controllers + internal bus http://my.ddteam.net/files/2011-03-14_RT305xF_support.patch 2. RT305xF embedded ethernet controller

[CFT][patch]cfi driver support for NOR flash arrays

2011-03-14 Thread Aleksandr Rybalko
Hi, all. proposed patch add support of NOR flash arrays to cfi driver http://my.ddteam.net/files/2011-03-11_cfi_flash_array_support.patch Supported arrays split by address (example: first on offset 0, second on offset 0x40) and interleaved (example: two devices with 16bit width, mapped to

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, March 14, 2011 10:13:30 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead of sysinstall on install media. A big thank you is in order to everyone who provided advice,

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 03/14/11 10:44, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, March 14, 2011 10:13:30 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead of sysinstall on install media. A big thank you is in order to

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: Changes to release(7) - Release builds work and look slightly different now, so everyone who snapshot tinderboxes will likely find them breaking shortly. The nearest analog to the old

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 03/14/11 10:38, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: Changes to release(7) - Release builds work and look slightly different now, so everyone who snapshot tinderboxes will likely find them

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, March 14, 2011 11:56:14 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 03/14/11 10:44, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, March 14, 2011 10:13:30 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4d7e228a.4090...@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn writes: I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead of sysinstall on install media. A big thank you is in order to everyone who provided advice,

[TESTING]: boot2 compilation with -mregparm=3

2011-03-14 Thread Roman Divacky
Hi, This patch: http://lev.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2-mregparm.patch makes boot2 to be compiled with -mregparm=3 (which shrinks it some). It changes CFLAGS to include -mregparm=3 and also rewrites sio.S to use register passing. This survived my testing in qemu and jhb@s review.

svn commit r219563

2011-03-14 Thread Olivier Smedts
Hello, Since r219563 (I think, didn't have this problem a week ago), 9-CURRENT shows me a warning when I run su : Mar 14 22:49:59 q su: in pam_sm_authenticate(): (pam_group) neither luser nor ruser specified, assuming ruser % uname -a FreeBSD q.gid0.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0

Re: HEADS UP: sysinstall is no longer the default installer

2011-03-14 Thread Dan Mack
On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I just committed (r219641) changes that make the release infrastructure (src/release/Makefile) use bsdinstall by default instead of sysinstall on install media. A big thank you is in order to everyone who provided advice, criticism, and

Re: [ath] AR9285/AR2427 users - please test -HEAD

2011-03-14 Thread Vinícius Zavam
2011/3/13 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi all, I've been working on AR9285 and AR2427 specific fixes. I seem to have fixed the issues I've seen with my AR9285 and AR2427 (and my AR2427 actually performs better under FreeBSD than Linux. Hah!) Just to be clear - the AR2427 support now

Re: [ath] AR9285/AR2427 users - please test -HEAD

2011-03-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! Thanks for the information. Please (re) include the chipset details, and what's in dmesg for ath0. Please also re-run sysctl dev.ath.0.sample_stats=1 (and check dmesg) after doing a few transfers; that'll give statistics on the TX side after it's actually done some TX'ing. Thanks, Adrian

Re: [ath] AR9285/AR2427 users - please test -HEAD

2011-03-14 Thread Vinícius Zavam
2011/3/14 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi! Thanks for the information. Please (re) include the chipset details, and what's in dmesg for ath0. Please also re-run sysctl dev.ath.0.sample_stats=1 (and check dmesg) after doing a few transfers; that'll give statistics on the TX side after

Re: [ath] AR9285/AR2427 users - please test -HEAD

2011-03-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
Cool, so you're also seeing the hilariously garbage results when transmitting low-rate packets (11b rate.) Cool. I'll investigate that. adrian 2011/3/15 Vinícius Zavam egyp...@googlemail.com: 2011/3/14 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi! Thanks for the information. Please (re) include