Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in
devicestat.h:
...
funny thing is i found the following in scsi_pass.c:
Guys,
what do you think about the following change?
The idea is mark TSC as the best timecounter when it's invariant and
synchronized
between cores.
Unfortunately I don't have code to auto-detect the synchronization and keep
relying on the corresponding tunable. I thought about auto-setting it
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let
tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
dir(s).
i ran a test via
make toolchains
make MAKE_JUST_KERNELS=yes tinderbox
and nothing seemed to go wrong with the extra
Hi--
On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
what do you think about the following change?
The idea is mark TSC as the best timecounter when it's invariant and
synchronized
between cores.
Unfortunately I don't have code to auto-detect the synchronization and keep
relying on the
On Thursday 07 April 2011 01:12 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Guys,
what do you think about the following change?
The idea is mark TSC as the best timecounter when it's invariant
and synchronized between cores. Unfortunately I don't have code to
auto-detect the synchronization and keep relying on
On 4/7/11 10:12 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Guys,
what do you think about the following change?
The idea is mark TSC as the best timecounter when it's invariant and
synchronized
between cores.
Unfortunately I don't have code to auto-detect the synchronization and keep
relying on the corresponding
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let
tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
dir(s).
i ran a test via
make toolchains
make
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will
let
tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will
let
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to
on 07/04/2011 23:00 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
Although it looks okay, please don't commit it just yet. I am working
in this area actively. Also, if the Intel's claim is true, i.e.,
TSCs reset to zero when APs start, we cannot use TSC as a timecounter
hardware until all APs are
on 07/04/2011 13:59 Alexander Motin said the following:
Any objections? Or SCSI/IDE there expected to mean command set?
Sorry for saying something potentially stupid, but... do we actually have any
reason to make that distinction from any practical point?
--
Andriy Gapon
12 matches
Mail list logo
