On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:35:01AM +0100, Hugo Silva wrote:
Le Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:22:31 +0100,
Hugo Silva h...@barafranca.com a ?crit :
Hello,
I'm wondering. On a virtual machine (amd64 HVM+PV), it's crashing
every time. Not sure if this is SNAFU, as I had never used ufs
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Yes, using vfs_getnewfsid() does not solve the issue.
I noticed that Solaris looked up a fixed array vfssw[] exactly for
the purpose. I think a table like it is a good solution for fixing
fsid for each file system.
--
John De wrote:
Hi,
I have an nfs server running 9-current. Everything works as far
as nfs i/o operations are concerned.
From another FreeBSD box, nfs locking works great to the server
when addressed by both it's real ip address and it's aliased ip
address.
From a Linux system:
On 08/20/11 02:22, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
Maybe, everything is reported already, but I think, that better I'll
be second, that no-one notice this:
Manual partitioning chosen
(1) Installer offer me bunch of Partition schemes, but only MBR
and BSD have sense. Why
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:21 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/08/2011 01:07 Derrick Edwards said the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xbe00a45b6798
This address looks suspiciously like a result of bit flips.
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:21 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/08/2011 01:07 Derrick Edwards said the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xbe00a45b6798
This address looks suspiciously like a result of bit flips.
Hello, Nathan.
You wrote 21 августа 2011 г., 20:53:22:
GPT is bootable on all x86 systems, with either EFI or BIOS, and is now
Ok, I was not sure here.
(5) Partition creation dialog has button Options, but modify dialog
doesn't.
This is by design. The installer can't run tunefs, nor is
on 21/08/2011 20:47 Derrick Edwards said the following:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:21 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/08/2011 01:07 Derrick Edwards said the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xbe00a45b6798
This
On 08/10/11 18:17, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jonathan Andersonjonat...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Love the new installer, but I do have a very small criticism of the
guided partitioning screen: it's unclear at first glance which of the
available buttons (Create,
2011/8/21 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Nathan.
You wrote 21 августа 2011 г., 20:53:22:
GPT is bootable on all x86 systems, with either EFI or BIOS, and is now
Ok, I was not sure here.
The Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Table states that Windows only supports
GPT boot when
Sorry. This turned out to be an unrelated configuration problem due to my
strange zfs layout. The ATA_CAM driver is not implicated!
Thanks to all for their attention to this matter.
Alexander burchell
On Aug 12, 2011 2:39 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12.08.2011 22:33,
And if you want to run bsdinstall after installation for creating new
partitions on just mounted hdd it require root mount point. And I have to
set root mount point on existing partition.
--
View this message in context:
2011/8/21 Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com:
2011/8/21 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Nathan.
You wrote 21 августа 2011 г., 20:53:22:
GPT is bootable on all x86 systems, with either EFI or BIOS, and is now
Ok, I was not sure here.
The Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Table
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/18/11 18:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I inconveniently
forgot that geom can't grok
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Matt sendtom...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/18/11 16:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I inconveniently
forgot that geom can't grok secondary PC MBR
On 08/21/11 15:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/18/11 18:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I
On 08/21/11 15:53, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mattsendtom...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/18/11 16:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I inconveniently
forgot
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Ashley Williams ashley@gmail.com wrote:
walltimestamp and timestamp don't appear to be right in BETA-1:
# dtrace -qn 'syscall::exec*:return { printf(%Y
%s\n,walltimestamp,curpsinfo-pr_psargs); }'
On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
gpart does not support (well, anyway) changing the underlying partition table
format without committing changes. Replacing the partition scheme, which this
does, is such an operation.
Weird. I could always destroy tables, create new
On 08/21/11 14:41, Kevin Oberman wrote:
2011/8/21 Lev Serebryakovl...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Nathan.
You wrote 21 августа 2011 г., 20:53:22:
GPT is bootable on all x86 systems, with either EFI or BIOS, and is now
Ok, I was not sure here.
The Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Table states
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:17:12AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:31 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
? ?When loading if_alc as a module on my netbook and running
/etc/rc.d/netif restart, I can
On 08/21/11 18:11, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
gpart does not support (well, anyway) changing the underlying partition table
format without committing changes. Replacing the partition scheme, which this
does, is such an operation.
Weird. I
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/21/11 18:11, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
gpart does not support (well, anyway) changing the underlying partition
table format without committing changes.
Hi Rick,
Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote
in 59520805.118597.1313885734529.javamail.r...@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca:
rm Hiroki, could you please test the attached patch.
rm
rm One problem with this patch is that I don't know how to create a fixed
rm table that matches what systems would
On Aug 21, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
No, it's stupider than that. When you destroy a gpart without committing, the
GEOM itself lingers as a (none)-type partitioning. This of course makes
sense, since that ghost geom is what is maintaining all the state, but
sometimes
On 08/21/11 20:28, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
No, it's stupider than that. When you destroy a gpart without committing, the
GEOM itself lingers as a (none)-type partitioning. This of course makes sense,
since that ghost geom is what is
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Long story short, I was running a UP kernel on a netbook trying to
stimulate a crash and when I did dump, it would periodically fail
non-recursive mutex failure with the output shown below (I caught it
once, but
On Aug 21, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The regular partitioning editor only commits early in this particular case,
and asks about each subpartition tree separately with a big scary dialog
box. In the spirit of the autopartitioner, it makes one large scary dialog,
and always
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:26:45PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:48 PM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:17:12AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:31 PM, ?m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM,
Honestly - if you're relying on doing anything that isn't read-only w/
GEOM right until commit, I think you're doing it wrong.
If anything, you should write something which manipulates geom tables
in userland, and can have a geom database populated from the kernel.
All of your subsequent tools
Doing it that way is really, really error-prone, because you have to
guess (a) whether gpart will accept certain configurations and (b) how
it will handle requests. On some schemes, partititions have to be
aligned or sized in particular ways and have various limitations.
Depending on the
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:55 PM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:26:45PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:48 PM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:17:12AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011
I totally get it.
However, an installer is user-facing (here), as well as system-facing.
As much as I understand the logic behind it, it is still going to
surprise people to find that their partition tables are modified at
any point before that final commit.
Linux installers manage to do it. :-)
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
If anyone thinks using a fixed table to assign vfc_typenum for known
file system types is a bad idea, please let us know.
Fixed table sounds like a good plan.
Is there a reason
Quoting Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org:
I totally get it.
However, an installer is user-facing (here), as well as system-facing.
As much as I understand the logic behind it, it is still going to
surprise people to find that their partition tables are modified at
any point before that final
On 22.08.2011 4:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The larger problem is that this behavior means that destroying gparts
sometimes doesn't work at
all. For instance, if you have nested partitioning like MBR+BSD (or EBR) it
is not possible to
destroy the underlying MBR geom without committing the
36 matches
Mail list logo
