Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: This website should be brushed up or taken offline! It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 August 2011 19:47, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Justin Hibbits chmeeed...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: On 27 August

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

2011-08-28 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: This website should be brushed up or taken offline! It seems

Re: LOR 9.0 beta1

2011-08-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/23/2011 7:48 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Holger Kipp holger.k...@alogis.com wrote: Maybe already seen... This is within Parallels 6.0 VM on a Mac with OS 10.6.8 ... This is a well known LOR. There are a lot of well-known LORs in HEAD. This is a bug.

Re: if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, ... Well, the ath_hal code should be built in as part of the ath module. ath needs ath_hal to speak to the MAC/baseband/radio. There's no need for #ifdef's to guard them as .. well, they're needed. Ok. I'd like

Re: if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
that looks a bit special. On 29 August 2011 07:38, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to eventually split out the ath_hal again into a separate module and re-instate the separation between HAL and driver code (primarily to enforce cleaner code and more stable APIs.) Good to

Re: if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: that looks a bit special. On 29 August 2011 07:38, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to eventually split out the ath_hal again into a separate module and re-instate the separation between HAL and driver

Re: if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 29 August 2011 08:42, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: Which NIC is this for again? AR9285? Yup: Hm, the code which sets rs_antenna should set it to something valid (in ar5416/ar5416_recv.c) : rs-rs_antenna = MS(ads-ds_rxstatus3, AR_RxAntenna); and that's an 24 bit field.

Re: AW: Panic with 9.0 Beta 1 (arcmsr.c)

2011-08-28 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/24/11 08:18, Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote: After this messages there are no visible disks. A camcontrol rescan all leads tot he same timeouts. Is this problem still persist after updating to at least r224905? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-