On 10/10/11 03:18, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antarn...@pozo.com wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
2011/10/9 Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang.
That could be mine, ports/160544 ?
I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is there a project afoot to update the system
On Friday 07 October 2011 08:32:40 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 7 October 2011 13:55, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen this before?
This is _not_ plug/unplug the active storage device, or another
storage device. This is when doing IO on a storage device (whether the
ok, I'll do some more detailed testing in the next few days.
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
GPT must have backup copy in last sector by standard ...
In that case, shouldn't it refuse to install on any provider that is
not in fact a disk, so as not to create configurations that cannot
work properly?
MBR doesn;t have any additional metadata. How
Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
GPT _must_ be placed twice -- at first and last sectors
(really, more than one sectors). By standard. Secondary
copy must be at end of disk. Period.
Then, by standard GPT cannot coexist with GLABEL. Such setup
should be disallowed, or at least big
John j...@freebsd.org wrote:
... gpart should show warning message if user is trying to put
GPT on non real disk devices.
...
This also seem to prevent something useful like:
# camcontrol inquiry da0
pass2: HP EH0146FAWJB HPDD Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
pass2: Serial Number
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com mentioned:
Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it.
Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its
location?
This
On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com mentioned:
Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it.
Since when can anyone just commit stuff to
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
tools to work with:
http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
You need to do the equivalent of
On Sun, October 9, 2011 13:39, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, October 8, 2011 20:03, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
The pkg-message tells them to do that.
ops, haven't seen it though. all the ports cleaned by the
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
tools to work with:
On 10/10/2011 15:00, Nali Toja wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
On 10/09/2011 09:29, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:52 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org said:
dougb In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on
10.0
dougb because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
dougb there
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
tools to
On 10/10/11 15:30, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sun, October 9, 2011 13:39, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, October 8, 2011 20:03, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
The pkg-message tells them to do that.
ops, haven't
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Hartmann, O.
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com mentioned:
Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
something??? Erwin
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:04:19 -0700
Stanislav Sedov s...@freebsd.org mentioned:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com mentioned:
Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it.
On Mon, October 10, 2011 18:38, Phil Oleson wrote:
On 10/10/11 15:30, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sun, October 9, 2011 13:39, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, October 8, 2011 20:03, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
The
Hi!
On a newly installed development machine I installed
subversion-freebsd
from ports and ended up with a huge dependency chain.
If you're just using it for FreeBSD you can un-check all
the OPTIONS. If
you might want to use the http:// protocol to check
something out the
neon
20 matches
Mail list logo
