TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:04 -
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:16:57 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
Hi
The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do
it with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to
ifconfig_bge0 in rc.conf it does
Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote
in 201110190845.17950.jh...@meraka.csir.co.za:
jh On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:16:57 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
jh On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
jh Hi
jh
jh The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually
Xin LI delp...@delphij.net wrote
in 4e9dfd46.1040...@delphij.net:
de -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
de Hash: SHA256
de
de On 10/18/11 15:07, Hiroki Sato wrote:
de Hideki Yamamoto hyam...@gmail.com wrote in
de CAOEiK=_nEJ=9prg1y5fmdbbwyqxypd-3+nyomqa9asekkgh...@mail.gmail.com:
de
de hy
Mattia Rossi mro...@swin.edu.au wrote
in 4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au:
mr So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing inet6 to ifconfig
mr automatically?
No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed.
mr Does passing two options work, or do I have to pass them separately?
On 18. Oct 2011, at 22:30 , Mattia Rossi wrote:
On 19/10/2011 08:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
Hi
The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do it
with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 -
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 -
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 -
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:49 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:49 -
2011/10/17 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
Hello all.
I'm currently made set of scripts, which builds FreeBSD from svn sources,
and packing it in VirtualBox (*.vdi) compatible images.
It's working now, and producing something like
.. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
2011/10/14 David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:55:28AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
That's what most people think.
Could be. But to the extent that it's true, I have no reason to believe
that it's a perspective that is held uniquely (or even principally) about
2011/10/15 George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what most people think.
I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
longer. Six months, for example.
New STABLE branch is very
2011/10/15 Martin Sugioarto mar...@sugioarto.com
Am Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:55:28 +0400
schrieb Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
That's what most people think.
Hi!
I'm not thinking this. This is made up by users who only adapt slowly
to changes and features. Look at the whole crowd which
2011/10/15 Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net
MHO different OS releases (Unix or not) are usually at the state of
FreeBSD current regarding stability. FreeBSD late BETA and early RC
are usually very stable. Therefore the approximate one month period
between the first beta and the
On 19 October 2011 15:42, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
=) Thats why we don't have much people in FreeBSD. FreeBSD for users? or
developers?
The big problem is that these conversations are not wanted everyone.
Nobody cares. For example, Vadim Goncharov wrote big mail with
On 19 October 2011 16:04, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
kern/160678? A good example.
I give 5$ that this fix won't be in 9.0 RELEASE =)
I know a few other important PRs that won't be in 9.0 RELEASE.
Thats why I wrote initial email.
Kirk fixed it in -HEAD. I hope he'll get it tested
On 19 October 2011 19:38, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160943 (there is hope)
or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161123 (little hope. it's not
me, but there I was noisy.)
Just send the committer a polite, nicely worded email and
Pavel Timofeev schreef:
I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
longer. Six months, for example.
New STABLE branch is very important!
So is opening head up to allow developers to work on and commit new
code. As with many things in engineering,
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
On 19 October 2011 16:04, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
kern/160678? A good example.
I give 5$ that this fix won't be in 9.0 RELEASE =)
I know a few other important PRs that won't be in 9.0 RELEASE.
Thats why I wrote initial email.
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
On 19 October 2011 15:42, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
=) Thats why we don't have much people in FreeBSD. FreeBSD for users? or
developers?
The big problem is that these conversations are not wanted everyone.
Nobody cares. For
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 -
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 -
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I wanted to let you know that FreeBSD is booting again. I don't know
exatly what was the solution but here's what I did:
1. clean up the pool, now 90% of free space
2. buildworld with r226519 and Andriy's patch:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Reversing out SVN r226509 restores normal operation,
imb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
2011/10/19 Johan Hendriks joh.hendr...@gmail.com
Pavel Timofeev schreef:
I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
longer. Six months, for example. New STABLE branch is very important!
So is opening head up to allow developers to work on and commit new
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
On 19 October 2011 19:38, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160943 (there is hope)
or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161123 (little hope. it's
not
me, but there I was noisy.)
Just
I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me:
--- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.0 -0400
+++ mkmakefile.c2011-10-06 11:13:31.0 -0400
@@ -742,15 +742,16 @@
break;
.
During install, in the 'Add Users' part, why is it able to add the new
user 'peter' to a new group 'peter' [the default option], but when I try
to put user 'peter' into a more generic new group 'admin' it says group
does not exist - I figure group 'peter' also does not exist at this time.
Michael Butler i...@protected-networks.net writes:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Thanks for the report. Try r226546.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Michael Butleri...@protected-networks.net writes:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Thanks for the report. Try r226546.
Fixed - Thanks! :-)
imb
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
as a result of a make buildkernel make installkernel reboot all
on NFS I got this with a HEAD SVN source at r226465. I cannot dump
unfortunately and it seems I just killed the obj tree for this kernel
though it should be very close.
Oct 18 10:03:22 lion3
On 19. Oct 2011, at 16:00 , Rick Macklem wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
as a result of a make buildkernel make installkernel reboot all
on NFS I got this with a HEAD SVN source at r226465. I cannot dump
unfortunately and it seems I just killed the obj tree for this kernel
though it
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Michael Butleri...@protected-networks.net writes:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Thanks for the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Michael Butleri...@protected-networks.net writes:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/10/2011 18:54 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
Andry Gapon wrote:
Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
name
(i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of
panicing.
Hello,
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a followup
commit as well. I just need to know if
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Michael
On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On
On Tue Oct 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
hi there,
any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
/dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays
depend
on /dev/dvd.
IMO, go
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
Hello,
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
Yes, soonish. If people like
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Would you be able to
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:14:07 +0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :)
Adrian
Because we can't do duplex operations in that way. But if we use old
struct, we will be able send and receive in the same time. I don't know
if such
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
I pretty reproducible get the following (handtranscribed) panic
when sending an zfs snapshot to geli provider based on an USB
stick that disappears (due to a bug, or because it's unplugged):
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Hi there
After my upgrade from 285.03 to 285.05.09 I experience daily to bidaily
freezes on 10-current, with nvidia 8600gts.
I'm guessing they come from the nvidia-driver. I'm back to 285.03 (which
ran without fault) now to test if they persist.
mfg tobias
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:20:07
48 matches
Mail list logo
