On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:50:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:224
#1 0x804f6d3b in kern_reboot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:447
#2 0x804f63e9 in panic (fmt=0x104 Address 0x104 out of bounds) at
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:51:05 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
Was trying to use gmirror(4) or zfs(4) today to get a machine in the
cluster setup with s/w raid and was completely flummoxed by the
intricacies of manual setup. Chances are, I just am not smart enough
to
wind my way though the various how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
on 08/12/2011 10:13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:50:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
(kgdb) bt #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:224 #1 0x804f6d3b
in kern_reboot (howto=260) at
On 07.12.11 22:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Sorry, forgot to mention that the above is with TSO DISABLED
(which is not the default). TSO seems to have a very bad
interaction with HWCSUM and non-zero mitigation.
I have this on both sender and receiver
# ifconfig ix1
ix1:
On 12/08/2011 09:35 AM, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:51:05 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
Was trying to use gmirror(4) or zfs(4) today to get a machine in the
cluster setup with s/w raid and was completely flummoxed by the
intricacies of manual setup. Chances are, I just am not smart
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:06:26PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 07.12.11 22:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Sorry, forgot to mention that the above is with TSO DISABLED
(which is not the default). TSO seems to have a very bad
interaction with HWCSUM and non-zero mitigation.
I have this on
from my last message:
I can't get cdrtools (cdrecord or readcd) to work on FreeBSD 9.0-RC2, and now I
see RC3 is available.
I tried options ATA_CAM in kernel config, removing device atapicam, but
still
readcd -scanbus or
cdrecord -scanbus
refuses to work, running as root.
camcontrol devlist
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results.
I don't know exactly where the problem is, but the high number of
read
Hi,
If someone want to look at I've added support for VIA south bridge watchdog.
It has been tested on VX900 but should works with VX800, VX855, CX700.
http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-watchdog-via-rev1
Posted rev2 :
On 12/08/2011 01:25, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I can't get cdrtools (cdrecord or readcd) to work on FreeBSD 9.0-RC2, and now I
see RC3 is available.
I tried options ATA_CAM in kernel config, removing device atapicam, but
still
readcd -scanbus or
cdrecord -scanbus
refuses to work, running as
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:27:03PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to establish the baseline performance for 10G throughput
over TCP, and would like to collect some data points. As a testing
program i am using nuttcp from ports (as good as anything, i
guess -- it is reasonably
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
I ran a bunch of tests on the ixgbe (82599) using RELENG_8 (which
seems slightly faster than HEAD) using MTU=1500 and various
combinations of card capabilities (hwcsum,tso,lro),
On 12/4/11 5:11 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/12/2011 17:30 m...@freebsd.org said the following:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Baldwin said the following:
Ah, ok (I had thought SCHEDULER_STOPPED was going to always be true when
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
And what problems did you run into?
More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
doesn't work. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
for the BIG RED WARNING that says why.
This guide worked
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
And what problems did you run into?
More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
doesn't work. See
Sean Bruno schreef:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
And what problems did you run into?
More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
doesn't work. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
for the BIG RED WARNING that says
On 08/12/2011 15:55, Sean Bruno wrote:
BSDInstaller and its predecessor Sysinstall don't have any code to
create or destroy zfs(4) or geom(4) volumes. So, the amount of exposure
to real users is approaching 0 in comparison to the number of people who
really do use FreeBSD.
I have my hands full
On 08.12.2011 14:11, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results.
I don't know exactly where the
On 08.12.2011 16:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
I ran a bunch of tests on the ixgbe (82599) using RELENG_8 (which
seems slightly faster than HEAD) using MTU=1500 and various
combinations of
Hello -current!
Recently on -arch@, we discussed adding the C99 keywords bool, true,
and false to the kernel. I now have patches to do this as well as fix
up some build issues.
The original thread was here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-November/011937.html
I split the
Dear -hackers,
can someone please enlighten me as to why maxio is not set by mps(4),
and, what would be a reasonable number to set it to if i felt inclined
to do so? default DFLTPHYS of 64K seems a bit low to me.
thanks,
max
___
Hi all,
Just wanted to report back that I found time to do more diagnostics.
ZFS/FreeBSD/etc are not to blame. ZFS / FreeBSD never reported any I/O
errors and scrubs always came up clean because one of the disks was
failing and had issues reading the disk but would eventually return
accurate
The third and what should be final Release Candidate build for the
9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. Since this is the
beginning of a brand new branch (stable/9) I cross-post the
announcements to both -current and -stable. But just so you know
most of the developers active in head and
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:33:04AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 08.12.2011 16:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
...
Jeff tested the WIP patch and it *doesn't* fix the issue. I don't have
LRO capable hardware setup locally to figure out
24 matches
Mail list logo
