On 29.12.11 01:04, Kirk McKusick wrote:
Rather than changing BKVASIZE, I would try running the cvs2svn
conversion on a 16K/2K filesystem and see if that sorts out the
problem. If it does, it tells us that doubling the main block
size and reducing the number of buffers by half is the problem.
On 2 Jan, Florian Smeets wrote:
On 29.12.11 01:04, Kirk McKusick wrote:
Rather than changing BKVASIZE, I would try running the cvs2svn
conversion on a 16K/2K filesystem and see if that sorts out the
problem. If it does, it tells us that doubling the main block
size and reducing the number of
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or something maybe?), and
2) add an option to suppress empty periodic emails entirely?
Sample:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:47:03PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 2 Jan, Florian Smeets wrote:
On 29.12.11 01:04, Kirk McKusick wrote:
Rather than changing BKVASIZE, I would try running the cvs2svn
conversion on a 16K/2K filesystem and see if that sorts out the
problem. If it does, it tells
Hi,
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have been
performed correctly. If it does not contain the section headings, the
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or something
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Holger Kipp holger.k...@alogis.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve .
The periodic scripts are badly in need of attention, so effort in
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve .
On 01/02/2012 14:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down
On 2. Jan 2012, at 22:51 , Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/02/2012 14:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic,
On 2. Jan 2012, at 21:56 , Holger Kipp wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have been
performed correctly. If
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
basedir_show_success variable controls the masking of this
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
On 01/02/2012 15:10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Looking at the scripts, there are bugs where all of the
beforementioned scripts would always be mute (because rc=0 is
explicitly set at the bottom), unless _show_success was set to YES.
Take a look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf
--
You
On 2. Jan 2012, at 23:09 , Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the
On 2 Jan, Don Lewis wrote:
On 2 Jan, Florian Smeets wrote:
This does not make a difference. I tried on 32K/4K with/without journal
and on 16K/2K all exhibit the same problem. At some point during the
cvs2svn conversion the sycer starts to use 100% CPU. The whole process
hangs at that point
I am running 9.0-RC3 on an Acer Aspire One D255E netbook. I have most of the
functionality I want with one major exception, when I enable ACPI my integrated
keyboard drivers aren't loaded. Without ACPI I can use my keyboard as atkbdc
and atkbd get loaded, (not psm though), but I have problems
I am running 9.0-RC3 on an Acer Aspire One D255E netbook. I have most of the
functionality I want with one major exception, when I enable ACPI my integrated
keyboard drivers aren't loaded. Without ACPI I can use my keyboard as atkbdc
and atkbd get loaded, (not psm though), but I have problems
I have a RELENG_9 machine that hangs when a snapshot is created on the
root fs (UFS, with SU+J). More accurately, all the processes show a
state of suspfs (with ^T) and no fs activity is completed from then
on. A hard reboot (power cycle) was the only way to proceed.
Here's some reference info
22 matches
Mail list logo
