RE: mps module compilation issue on FreeBSD-9 amd64

-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Desai, Kashyap Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 2:45 PM To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: gi...@freebsd.org; Kenneth D. Merry; McConnell,

mps module compilation issue on FreeBSD-9 amd64

Hi, I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver (this is a latest driver from LSI). Here are the steps I followed. CASE-1 1. remove mps directory from sys/dev and sys/module and overwrite those two directories with my latest code. 2. go to sys/module/mps and run

Retiring non-mpsafe filesystems (was: Re: svn commit: r227333 - in head: . sys/amd64/conf sys/arm/conf sys/conf sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/kern sys/mips/conf sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sp

Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org writes: In one month I'm going to disable VFS_ALLOW_NONMPSAFE by defaults in order to see how well the users do with this option down. At the present times this means that from 1st March you won't be able to mount smbfs or ntfs volumes, for example. Hmm, wasn't

Re: Does anyone try kib's Sandy Bridge PCID patch (pcid.2.patch)?

在 2012年1月30日 下午2:36，Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com 写道： On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:15:51AM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote: I have two boxes, one is AMD Athlon 610e 2.4G with FreeBSD-current patched with pcid.2.patch? It works well without other issue and it seem the pcid patch does not affect

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-01-30 09:29:29 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 09:29:29 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-30 09:29:29 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 09:29:39 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 09:29:39 -

[HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

Hi, pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the ports tree (disabled by default). 1/ Why pkgng? Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain, and they lack features: - missing metadata - no upgrade support - no repository

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

Cool ! wen 2012/1/30 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org Hi, pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the ports tree (disabled by default). 1/ Why pkgng? Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain, and they lack

Re: Does anyone try kib's Sandy Bridge PCID patch (pcid.2.patch)?

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:08:13PM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote: ?? 2012??1??30?? 2:36??Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com ?? On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:15:51AM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote: I have two boxes, one is AMD Athlon 610e 2.4G with FreeBSD-current patched with pcid.2.patch? It

revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

First, I think that this proposal/discussion could have been more useful before the 9.0. Maybe the RE would be interested in adding another item to their pre-release checklist: ask developers about what could be dropped and what should be added to the Safe Mode settings in a new (.0) release.

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: Hi Baptiste, This looks great! On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: Sample output of pkg info: $ pkg info -f libreoffice: Name : libreoffice Version: 3.4.4

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

Hi Baptiste, This looks great! On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: Sample output of pkg info: $ pkg info -f libreoffice: Name : libreoffice Version: 3.4.4 Origin : editors/libreoffice Prefix : /usr/local

FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD is not a bit-value

Hello! sys/bus.h documents the following semantics for FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD: /**  * @brief Driver interrupt filter return values  *  * If a driver provides an interrupt filter routine it must return an  * integer consisting of oring together zero or more of the following

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something like raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please create an issue on the github :)) regards, Bapt I just created issue #128,

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:59 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: o hw.ata.ata_dma, hw.ata.atapi_dma - I am not sure if there have been any significant problems with ATA DMA recently. Maybe these could be removed? I still have to work with hardware that requires ata_dma disabled. It seems to be

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something like raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please create an issue on

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:59 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: o hw.ata.ata_dma, hw.ata.atapi_dma - I am not sure if there have been any significant problems with ATA DMA recently. Maybe these could be removed? I still have to work with hardware

Re: FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD is not a bit-value

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 22:50 +0600, Max Khon wrote: Hello! sys/bus.h documents the following semantics for FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD: /** * @brief Driver interrupt filter return values * * If a driver provides an interrupt filter routine it must return an * integer consisting of oring

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

On 01/28/12 15:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: P.S. As an aside, the provision in projects/jailconf/'s jail(8) that it's not possible for 'jail -r' to remove all jails _unless_ the '*' syntax is used seems unusual to me: I expect 'jail -r foo bar' to remove those two jails regardless of whether any

Re: posix_fadvise noreuse disables file caching

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 10:08:10 am Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wednesday 25 January 2012 17:29:22 John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, January 20, 2012 2:12:13 pm John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:39:42 am Tijl Coosemans wrote: I recently noticed that multimedia/vlc generates

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

Jamie Gritton wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:38:16 -0700: On 01/28/12 15:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: P.S. As an aside, the provision in projects/jailconf/'s jail(8) that it's not possible for 'jail -r' to remove all jails _unless_ the '*' syntax is used seems unusual to me: I expect 'jail -r

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:37 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:45 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:45 -

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

On 01/30/12 10:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Jamie Gritton wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:38:16 -0700: On 01/28/12 15:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: P.S. As an aside, the provision in projects/jailconf/'s jail(8) that it's not possible for 'jail -r' to remove all jails _unless_ the '*' syntax is used

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-01-30 16:48:46 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 16:48:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-30 16:48:46 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 16:48:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 16:48:55 -

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:26:25AM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: On 01/28/2012 11:48 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:12:13AM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: Attached are 4 separate patches for each somewhat independent portion of the kernel work related to the

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

On 01/28/2012 11:48 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:12:13AM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: Attached are 4 separate patches for each somewhat independent portion of the kernel work related to the follow-fork implementation. Ok, as I said, I think that vfork-fork.patch is

[patch] nextboot(8) arbitrary kernel environment

I have a patch to allow nextboot(8) to set arbitrary kernel environment variables (not just the kernel dir and kernel_options). The usage becomes: Usage: nextboot [-e variable=value] [-f] [-k kernel] [-o options] nextboot -D and the new option is documented as: -e variable=value

Re: [patch] nextboot(8) arbitrary kernel environment

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 14:57 -0500, Ed Maste wrote: I have a patch to allow nextboot(8) to set arbitrary kernel environment variables (not just the kernel dir and kernel_options). The usage becomes: Usage: nextboot [-e variable=value] [-f] [-k kernel] [-o options] nextboot -D and

Re: [patch] nextboot(8) arbitrary kernel environment

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: Minor nit: -It is not the most thoroughly tested code. +It is not the most throughly tested code. The original spelling is the correct one. Nice catch, and thanks for the review. This came from an accidental revert of

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

Gdb needs to be able to read/write process memory between the time the child is forked and exec is called (in the vfork case). Without the change it causes a kernel panic when gdb tries to read/write process memory. Since my understanding of the kernel is a bit limited, it was the best I could

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:21 -

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:46 -

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:49 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 19:30:49 -

Re: Intermittent re0 phy failure

On 01/18/12 20:52, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote: On 01/18/12 19:54, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:48:47PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote: At random intervals, when re0 is without any significant load; idle for lengthy

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: [...] to use pkgng: echo WITH_PKGNG=yes /etc/make.conf make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean Some links: http://wiki.FreeBSD.org/pkgng http://github.com/pkgng/pkgng Note that on github you can find a

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

Someone with sparc build experience want to look at this and maybe see something I'm missing, this error makes no sense to me, these are defined in ixgbe_type.h and I see nothing architecture sensitive?? Jack On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.orgwrote: TB

FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64: revision 230789: usr/src/sys/modules/ixgbe/../../dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_osdep.h:109:19: error: typedef redefinition with different types ('boolean_t' (aka 'int') vs '_Bool'),typedef

The follwoing error occurs hwen trying to compile a kernel (make buildworld works fine): objcopy --strip-debug if_ixgb.ko === ixgbe (all) clang -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native -DSMP -DIXGBE_FDIR -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-01-30 21:30:51 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 21:30:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-01-30 21:30:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 21:30:58 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 21:30:58 -

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64: revision 230789: [...]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:55:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: The follwoing error occurs hwen trying to compile a kernel (make buildworld works fine): objcopy --strip-debug if_ixgb.ko === ixgbe (all) clang -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64: revision 230789: [...]

Yes, it was. Now if I can just figure out what's going on with sparc Jack On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:55:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: The follwoing error occurs hwen trying to compile a kernel (make buildworld works

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-01-30 22:38:09 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 22:38:09 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-01-30 22:38:09 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 22:38:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 22:38:14 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-01-30 21:43:21 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 21:43:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-30 21:43:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 21:43:28 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 21:43:28 -

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote: Set use_pkgng=yes in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.conf. Sorry, portmaster.rc. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote: The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng): https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L514 https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L528 Please, take the patch from here:

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-01-30 22:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-30 22:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-30 22:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-30 22:20:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-30 22:20:08 -

Re: Does anyone try kib's Sandy Bridge PCID patch (pcid.2.patch)?

在 2012年1月31日 上午12:43，Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com 写道： On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:08:13PM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote: ?? 2012??1??30?? 2:36??Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com ?? On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:15:51AM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote: I have two boxes, one is AMD Athlon

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote: On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote: The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng): https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L514

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the ports tree (disabled by default). 1/ Why pkgng? the name sucks though it would be good to fix it before it's built in everywhere. like windows NT, which it

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:16:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the ports tree (disabled by default). 1/ Why pkgng? the name sucks though it would be

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:27:20AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote: On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote: On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote: The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):