On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:30:04AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:57:16AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:24:58AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:24:47PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On 24.02.2012 12:37, Alex Keda wrote:
problem, first described:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-December/030528.html
on last days 2011 year, all work OK, without some custom kernel
new year - old problems =)
if I rename drm.ko - all OK.
with drm.ko - I have monitor off
Inviato da iPad
Il giorno 01/mar/2012, alle ore 03:01, Steve Wills ha
scritto:
>
> The failure I experienced was with web servers running 8.0 behind a F5
> load balancer in an HA setup. Whenever the failover happened, the web
> servers would continue sending to the wrong MAC address, despite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/12 13:17, K. Macy wrote:
> .
>>
>> I tried it, on both FreeBSD routers, web systems, and database
>> servers; all on 8.2+. It still causes massive instability.
>> Disabling the sysctl, and/or removing it from the kernel solved
>> the problem
On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:46 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:23:11 am Scott Long wrote:
>> I still think that it's useful to be able to disable ACPI. Just because
> ACPI works well on modern hardware doesn't mean that everything crummy from
> 2000-2007 suddenly disappeare
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/02/2012 00:18 Kevin Oberman said the following:
>> APIC is required for SMP, but works on many older, single CPU systems
>> and removes the massive sharing of IRQs common on non-APIC systems.
>>
>> OTOH, some ThinkPads simply won't boot
On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> >On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
> >>that would
> >>make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
> >>such as
> >
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 13:00 -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:18:13AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:18:45PM +, jb wrote:
> > > > Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writ
.
>
> I tried it, on both FreeBSD routers, web systems, and database
> servers; all on 8.2+. It still causes massive instability. Disabling
> the sysctl, and/or removing it from the kernel solved the problems.
Routing I can believe, but I'm wondering how close attention you paid
to the workload. T
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:18:13AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:18:45PM +, jb wrote:
> > > Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > ...
> > > > It's not a
> > > > directory or execu
Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
> ...
> Again, the problem here seems to be the use of 0661 in the lpr program,
> not the idea of negative permissions, not the new scan for the use of
> negative permissions.
This will go away after the fix below is applied.
> It's just an old bug in
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:18:45PM +, jb wrote:
> > Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
> >
> > > ...
> > > It's not a
> > > directory or executable file in the first place, so making it executable
> > > for everyone exce
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:18:45PM +, jb wrote:
> Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
>
> > ...
> > It's not a
> > directory or executable file in the first place, so making it executable
> > for everyone except the owner and group is not some sort of subtle
> > security trick, it's
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:18 +, jb wrote:
> Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
>
> > ...
> > It's not a
> > directory or executable file in the first place, so making it executable
> > for everyone except the owner and group is not some sort of subtle
> > security trick, it's just mea
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:57:16AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:24:58AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:24:47PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:07:43PM +, jb wrote:
> > > > Anton Shteren
Ian Lepore damnhippie.dyndns.org> writes:
> ...
> It's not a
> directory or executable file in the first place, so making it executable
> for everyone except the owner and group is not some sort of subtle
> security trick, it's just meaningless.
> ...
Is it meaningless ?
Example:
# cat /var/s
2012/2/29 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2012-02-28 22:22, Arnaud Lacombe pisze:
>
> FLOWTABLE on 8.x crashed BGP routers (kern/144917).
>
no crash dump, no backtrace, no follow-up whatsoever after 1 year and
2 years, what's your points ? You could really have chosen a better PR
>>>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting ~Lst (from Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:38:43 +0700):
>
>> 2012/2/28 Steve Wills :
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 13:21 +, jb wrote:
> jb gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > I would suggest (if you can) that you change the .seq permissions to 0664
> > and
> > watch what happens to it - the purpose is to narrow down who/what changed
> > its
> > mode.
> > Some history. logs. and some
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> I would suggest (if you can) that you change the .seq permissions to 0664 and
> watch what happens to it - the purpose is to narrow down who/what changed its
> mode.
> Some history. logs. and some ad hoc "watch script" would do it.
Take a look at "notify" feature (
As of r232144, SeaMonkey (a web browser) runs rather slowly and is
constantly eating 100% CPU time. Before r232144, SeaMonkey would start
up and run faster, and when it is not in use (is idling), its CPU
usage would slowly converge to 0.
I have a P4 processor [with HT], an r232012 world, and simil
Anton Shterenlikht bristol.ac.uk> writes:
> ...
> To the best of my knowledge the security warning started
> to appear recently. For the previous 2 years or so I haven't
> seen it. Now, I didn't modify the default security scripts,
> nor the lpd system. The file is created with this permissions
on 29/02/2012 00:18 Kevin Oberman said the following:
> APIC is required for SMP, but works on many older, single CPU systems
> and removes the massive sharing of IRQs common on non-APIC systems.
>
> OTOH, some ThinkPads simply won't boot with APIC. My old T43
> (Pentium-M) had this issue. I had t
Jason Hellenthal dataix.net> writes:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:54:20AM +, jb wrote:
> >
> > 0641 ? Are you sure ?
>
> Not at all ;)
>
> > > > > > > Checking negative group permissions:
> > > > > > > 70834 -rw-rx 1 root daemon 4 Feb 21 12:54:02 2012
> /var/spool/output/l
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:54:20AM +, jb wrote:
>
> 0641 ? Are you sure ?
Not at all ;)
> > > > > > Checking negative group permissions:
> > > > > > 70834 -rw-rx 1 root daemon 4 Feb 21 12:54:02 2012
/var/spool/output/lpd/.seq
--
;s =;
_
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:24:58AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:24:47PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:07:43PM +, jb wrote:
> > > Anton Shterenlikht bristol.ac.uk> writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This was discussed in questi
Jason Hellenthal dataix.net> writes:
> ...
> > > The file should not be executable, according to its purpose.
> > >
> > > So the lpr.c should be changed from
> > > if ((fd = open(buf, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0661)) < 0) {
> > ...
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165533
> ...
> Abov
27 matches
Mail list logo
