Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/03/2012 03:34 Devin Teske said the following: +1 on keeping the menu items loosely entwined (ACPI stands alone, but Safe Mode knows about ACPI but only acts on it when being enabled). Can you explain why? +1 for having both menu items and each doing its own thing without any

Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!

2012-03-01 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/03/2012 03:07 Kevin Oberman said the following: I disabled APIC with a tunable (hint.apic.0.disabled=1). The T43 has no BIOS setting to turn it off. I have some time and still have the computer and it is up and running 9-Stable. In theory, I am retired, but still work part-time job at

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-01 Thread Nikolay Denev
On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and 9.x) and a suitable loader.conf which: - tries to provide as much features as GENERIC (I lost one or two disk controllers, they are not available as a

Can't boot with geom_part_(gpt|mbr|bsd|ebr)

2012-03-01 Thread Pavel Timofeev
Hi! Just add to loader.conf these options geom_part_gpt_load=YES geom_part_bsd_load=YES geom_part_ebr_load=YES geom_part_mbr_load=YES and your kernel can't boot I have posted PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165573 ___

Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!

2012-03-01 Thread O. Hartmann
On 03/01/12 09:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0

Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
I think this is just right post to intrude :) I'm developing software, and making it in pretty good IDE - Intellij Idea. There's community and pro version. What good in this company - it gives access to Pro version for not-small open source projects. I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but

Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!

2012-03-01 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request for open source license. Are you requesting someone to create FreeBSD port for this

Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
2012/3/1 Eygene Ryabinkin r...@freebsd.org Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request for open source license. Are you

skype-2.1.0.81,1 problem in child proc

2012-03-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I'm using skype-2.1.0.81,1 in 10-CURRENT r226986, which works fine for chat and video calls; I encounter the following small problem: when a chat contains a URL one can open that URL with a browser; it seems that skype is launching a shell script /usr/local/bin/xdg-open which in turn

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-01 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: You can download from http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ The files are - i386_SMALL - i386_SMALL_loader.conf - amd64_SMALL - amd64_SMALL_loader.conf Where SCSI disk/etc?

Re: Can't boot with geom_part_(gpt|mbr|bsd|ebr)

2012-03-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/03/2012 09:27 Pavel Timofeev said the following: Hi! Just add to loader.conf these options geom_part_gpt_load=YES geom_part_bsd_load=YES geom_part_ebr_load=YES geom_part_mbr_load=YES and your kernel can't boot Thank you for the report. Could you please provide some technical

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:39 AM To: Devin Teske Cc: John Baldwin; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Scott Long; Devin Teske Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option on 01/03/2012 03:34 Devin

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:39:21 am Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/03/2012 03:34 Devin Teske said the following: +1 on keeping the menu items loosely entwined (ACPI stands alone, but Safe Mode knows about ACPI but only acts on it when being enabled). Can you explain why? +1 for having

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/03/2012 18:52 Devin Teske said the following: -Original Message- From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:39 AM To: Devin Teske Cc: John Baldwin; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Scott Long; Devin Teske Subject: Re: revisiting tunables

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Devin Teske wrote: -Original Message- From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:39 AM To: Devin Teske Cc: John Baldwin; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Scott Long; Devin Teske Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under

how to cross-build a single application ?

2012-03-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
What is the way to properly cross-build a single program (after having gone throught the 'toolchain' and possibly even a full 'buildworld') from the top-level directory of a FreeBSD source tree ? right now i do something like cd $SOURCE_ROOT make MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/my_obj_tree

Re: how to cross-build a single application ?

2012-03-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:24:13PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:38:19 +0100 Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: What is the way to properly cross-build a single program (after having gone throught the 'toolchain' and possibly even a full 'buildworld') from

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Scott Long [mailto:sco...@samsco.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:13 AM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Andriy Gapon'; 'John Baldwin'; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; 'Devin Teske' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option On Mar 1, 2012, at

Re: how to cross-build a single application ?

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:38:19 +0100 Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: What is the way to properly cross-build a single program (after having gone throught the 'toolchain' and possibly even a full 'buildworld') from the top-level directory of a FreeBSD source tree ? right now i do

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:07 AM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'John Baldwin'; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; 'Scott Long'; 'Devin Teske' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option on 01/03/2012 18:52

Re: how to cross-build a single application ?

2012-03-01 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:38:19PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: What is the way to properly cross-build a single program (after having gone throught the 'toolchain' and possibly even a full 'buildworld') from the top-level directory of a FreeBSD source tree ? right now i do something like

Updating /usr/src/sys to CURRENT

2012-03-01 Thread Ismael Farfán
Hello list Freebsd is not my main OS (yet), so I'm trying to update to CURRENT to try this lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-February/011445.html So I put this in my ports-supfile and updated *default release=cvs tag=. Here it says

Re: Updating /usr/src/sys to CURRENT

2012-03-01 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:26:38PM -0600, Ismael Farfán wrote: Hello list Freebsd is not my main OS (yet), so I'm trying to update to CURRENT to try this lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-February/011445.html So I put this in my ports-supfile and updated *default release=cvs

Re: Updating /usr/src/sys to CURRENT

2012-03-01 Thread Ismael Farfán
2012/3/1 Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:26:38PM -0600, Ismael Farfán wrote: Hello list Freebsd is not my main OS (yet), so I'm trying to update to CURRENT to try this lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-February/011445.html So I put this in my

Re: Can't boot with geom_part_(gpt|mbr|bsd|ebr)

2012-03-01 Thread Pavel Timofeev
I will make translation tomorrow. But you can see it by yourself, just edit your loader.conf =) 1 марта 2012 г. 20:08 пользователь Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org написал: on 01/03/2012 09:27 Pavel Timofeev said the following: Hi! Just add to loader.conf these options geom_part_gpt_load=YES

Re: Processes getting stuck in state tmpfs

2012-03-01 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
Could you test the patch attached. It's also available here as seperate commits: https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commits/tmpfs-rename Thanks, Gleb. On (23/02/2012 21:20), Florian Smeets wrote: On 11.02.12 11:20, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: On (10/02/2012 22:41), Florian Smeets wrote: Hi,

Re: Updating /usr/src/sys to CURRENT

2012-03-01 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:25:15PM -0600, Ismael Farfán wrote: What does your supfile contain?  I suspect it is missing the following line:  src-all tag=. Glen I'll add that and run csup again, thanks grep -v # /etc/ports-supfile-all *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Julian Elischer
On 3/1/12 8:52 AM, Devin Teske wrote: . Indeed, I've watched field engineers when exploring the menu options and their eyes light-up when they see that Safe Mode toggles ACPI off when enabled. Extrapolating on their surprise, they appear to have an Aha!-moment a ... they have all seen 'safe

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Julian Elischer
On 3/1/12 9:13 AM, Scott Long wrote: 1. There are a number of knobs that can be manipulated to help enable a non-booting system boot, which in turn gives a system administrator a fighting chance to figure out what's wrong. ACPI is (or was) one of these options, but there are several

Re: skype-2.1.0.81,1 problem in child proc

2012-03-01 Thread Juergen Lock
In article 20120301153409.GA2478@tiny you write: Hello, I'm using skype-2.1.0.81,1 in 10-CURRENT r226986, which works fine for chat and video calls; I encounter the following small problem: when a chat contains a URL one can open that URL with a browser; it seems that skype is launching a shell

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:jul...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:22 PM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Andriy Gapon'; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; 'Devin Teske'; 'John Baldwin' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option On 3/1/12 8:52

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:jul...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:28 PM To: Scott Long Cc: Devin Teske; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; 'Devin Teske'; 'John Baldwin'; 'Andriy Gapon' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option On

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote: I'm interested in which path you would choose amongst what I've seen mentioned thus far: a. Modifying the boot menu to offer fine-grain control over each aspect of Safe Mode (wherein perhaps the Safe Mode option becomes a hook for a

Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Julian Elischer
On 3/1/12 1:35 PM, Devin Teske wrote: Right, making the assumption that FreeBSD's safe mode will do the same thing as Windows' safe mode is a poor assumption. As you point out, all those things that Windows safe mode does, FreeBSD does not. X11 drivers are not affected by safe mode. Network

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Scott Long [mailto:sco...@samsco.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:43 PM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Julian Elischer'; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; 'Devin Teske'; 'John Baldwin'; 'Andriy Gapon' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

Re: gptzfsboot error using HP Smart Array P410i Controller

2012-03-01 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Hi! This is still happening with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE, as I have just discovered. The hack works like a charm, but seems kind of odd... :) Any progress in getting a real fix into the repository? Any risks with the hack - is it likely to believe that it will suddenly or sporadically fail? Cheers,

DTrace/MIPS port

2012-03-01 Thread Oleksandr Tymoshenko
Hello, Last few weeks I've been working on DTrace port for MIPS architecture. I believe that project reached the stage when it's ready for public review/testing before going into the tree. Patch and some information could be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/mips/dtrace/ I'd

RE: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option

2012-03-01 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:jul...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:52 PM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Andriy Gapon'; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; 'Devin Teske'; 'John Baldwin' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option On 3/1/12 1:35

Re: Processes getting stuck in state tmpfs

2012-03-01 Thread Florian Smeets
On 01.03.12 20:31, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: Could you test the patch attached. It's also available here as seperate commits: https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commits/tmpfs-rename The test that used to hang within a minute has now been running successfully for almost 2 hours. Looks good to

Re: how to cross-build a single application ?

2012-03-01 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (01/03/2012 18:52), Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:24:13PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:38:19 +0100 Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: What is the way to properly cross-build a single program (after having gone throught the 'toolchain' and

Re: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-01 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/29/2012 6:01 PM, Steve Wills wrote: On 02/29/12 13:17, K. Macy wrote: . I tried it, on both FreeBSD routers, web systems, and database servers; all on 8.2+. It still causes massive instability. Disabling the sysctl, and/or removing it from the kernel solved the problems. Routing I

Re: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-01 Thread K. Macy
Yes, that was part of it. On the web and db systems we had what I can only describe as general wackiness with systems suddenly becoming unreachable, etc. This was with a moderately complex network setup with a combination of different VLANs, multiple interfaces, etc. The FreeBSD routers would

Re: SeaMonkey eats the CPU as of r232144

2012-03-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
This is totally reproducable? Can you switch back/forth? Adrian On 29 February 2012 04:24, deeptec...@gmail.com deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: As of r232144, SeaMonkey (a web browser) runs rather slowly and is constantly eating 100% CPU time. Before r232144, SeaMonkey would start up and run

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
SunOS 4.x users will love you. :-) Adrian On 1 March 2012 02:27, Nikolay Denev nde...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and 9.x) and a suitable loader.conf which: - tries to

if_igb crashes system

2012-03-01 Thread matt
bringing up igb0 is currently causing my 10-CURRENT box to become very non-responsive (as though downclocked to some 100 KHZ...very, very, very slow). cmdwatch 'vmstat -i' shows the interrupts get assigned for igb0, and about 1 second later the machine is essentially non-responsive. anyone else

Re: skype-2.1.0.81,1 problem in child proc

2012-03-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, March 01, 2012 a las 10:13:14PM +0100, Juergen Lock escribió: I haven't really looked into this in detail but my guess is this is the Linux v4l2convert.so that is LD_PRELOAD'ed into skype for the benefit of cameras not able to provida yuv video. So I guess we'd need to