On 03/01/2012 16:03, K. Macy wrote:
I understand the switch. Uptime is important in any production
network. However, it seems like it may have been too easy to turn it
off because no one has made any effort to help me debug the issues. By
analogy your guidance for ports usability problems
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012
18:58:34 +0400):
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
You can download from
http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/
The files are
- i386_SMALL
- i386_SMALL_loader.conf
-
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012
18:58:34 +0400):
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
You can download from
On 02/25/12 15:55, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
Maybe some spam filters ate my mails so I am replying to current@.
Could anyone help to commit it?
Sorry, I had vacation. Committed.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Jia-Shiun Lijiash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I've submitted a PR for this:
Apparently you've missed all the times that I've given that exact advice. :)
But your analogy is severely flawed. Flowtable was an experimental
feature that theoretically might have increased performance for some
work flows, but turned out to be fatally flawed. The ports system is an
Kernel can't boot is a common idea.
I did the tests for each geom_part and described it in PR.
Some transcription:
boot stops (on usb detect) - boot stops, not hangs, you can push
Pause/Break and surf through system boot messages.
Devin Teske devin.teske at fisglobal.com writes:
...
So I would welcome discussions involving development of something better
(and am
willing to help).
...
Not exactly sure what service safemode start should do (BSD doesn't have the
same concept of runlevels as Linux does; so it's
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Fri, 2 Mar 2012
13:24:01 +0400):
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012
18:58:34 +0400):
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander
Adrian Chadd wrote:
This is totally reproducable? Can you switch back/forth?
Yes.
On 29 February 2012 04:24, deeptec...@gmail.comdeeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
As of r232144, SeaMonkey (a web browser) runs rather slowly and is
constantly eating 100% CPU time. Before r232144, SeaMonkey would
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:25:15PM -0600, you (Ismael Farf??n) sent the
following to [freebsd-current] :
Also, I just found this, I don't know if there is a better way of
updating src/sys
http://www.rhyous.com/2009/12/25/how-to-download-freebsd-current-or-freebsd-stable-using-svn/
I would
2012/3/2 marco marco+freebsd-curr...@lordsith.net:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:25:15PM -0600, you (Ismael Farf??n) sent the
following to [freebsd-current] :
Also, I just found this, I don't know if there is a better way of
updating src/sys
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 03/02/2012 03:44, K. Macy wrote:
Apparently you've missed all the times that I've given that exact advice. :)
But your analogy is severely flawed. Flowtable was an experimental
feature that theoretically might have increased performance for some
work flows, but turned out to be fatally
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation. So it has
increasingly become an OS where changes are being lobbed over the wall
by developers who don't run systems that those changes affect. That's no
way to run a
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
Last few weeks I've been working on DTrace port for MIPS architecture. I
believe that project reached the stage when it's ready for public
review/testing before going into the tree.
Patch and some information could be found here:
On 03/02/2012 10:46, K. Macy wrote:
You understand my point but then fail to or choose not to see how it
applies to you when it creates problems for you personally.
No, I already pointed out the distinction between new, experimental
features; and essential components of the FreeBSD operating
No, I already pointed out the distinction between new, experimental
features; and essential components of the FreeBSD operating system.
It's Ok for you to disagree with that distinction, or with its
importance. But what you're suggesting is that if users don't help
developers debug cool new
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:01:25 -0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
I bet it is old enough :)
I'm on 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227950 and when Seamonkey can't reach some
document it get 100% cpu. one time I even attach to it and
On 02.03.12 20:08, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:01:25 -0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
I bet it is old enough :)
I'm on 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227950 and when Seamonkey can't reach some
document it
Doug Barton wrote:
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation. So it has
increasingly become an OS where changes are being lobbed over the wall
by developers who don't run systems that those changes affect. That's
On 03/01/12 21:24, matt wrote:
bringing up igb0 is currently causing my 10-CURRENT box to become very
non-responsive (as though downclocked to some 100 KHZ...very, very, very
slow).
cmdwatch 'vmstat -i' shows the interrupts get assigned for igb0, and
about 1 second later the machine is
Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:01:25 -0800
Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
I bet it is old enough :)
I'm on 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227950 and when Seamonkey can't reach some
document it get 100% cpu. one time I
A truss snippet from running with an older-than-r232144 kernel:
clock_gettime(4,{29653.159790037 }) = 0 (0x0)
write(12,\M-z,1) = 1 (0x1)
clock_gettime(4,{29653.160165225 }) = 0 (0x0)
gettimeofday({1330716922.220648 },0x0) = 0 (0x0)
on 02/03/2012 20:21 Doug Barton said the following:
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation.
Do you care to back this up with facts?
Or are you going beyond constructive in your [self-]criticism of FreeBSD [OS,
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:52:06 +0100
Florian Smeets f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02.03.12 20:08, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:01:25 -0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
I bet it is old enough
On 3/2/2012 1:27 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/03/2012 20:21 Doug Barton said the following:
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation.
Do you care to back this up with facts?
You mean other than the very few
on 03/03/2012 00:24 Doug Barton said the following:
On 3/2/2012 1:27 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/03/2012 20:21 Doug Barton said the following:
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation.
Do you care to back
I set WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
evidenced by stuff installed on running system.
My main question is - how do I debug this? I
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:41:28PM -0500, Rotate 13 wrote:
I set WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
evidenced by stuff installed on
Hi,
We just released beta8 of pkgng, it comes with the usual fixes and some new
features:
pkg set is a new subcommand to modify the content of the local package database,
currently only modifying -a [01] the status wether the package as been installed
as a dependency or direct can be done.
pkg
On 2012-03-02 23:41, Rotate 13 wrote:
I set WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
evidenced by stuff installed on running system.
Have
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Rotate 13 rabg...@gmail.com wrote:
I set WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
evidenced by stuff
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:41:28 -0500, Rotate 13 wrote:
I set WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
evidenced by stuff installed on running
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:16:45 -0500, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
Does the datestamp on /usr/sbin/named reflect when you built the world
or could named have been left over from a previous install?
WITHOUT_BIND=yes doesn't delete named if its already installed (not
sure
if 'make
I've had the same problem with wireless.
For some users, wireless works flawlessly.
For other users, it's completely unusable.
Trying to get any kind of useful feedback from people has been
impossible at best. I've even had FreeBSD developers, sitting in the
developers IRC channel, say wifi is
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:48:12PM -0500, Rotate 13 wrote:
As for named running, if you do
sh /etc/rc.d/named restart
does it succeed? If so, the 'named_enable=no' flag must be set wrong.
sh /etc/rc.d/named restart gives exactly what you would expect
(Cannot `restart` named. Set
On 2012/3/3 1:01, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
Adrian
I am also running the seamonkey and can not reproduce the problem.
maybe he did hit the race window when I was committing the patches ?
can he update and install the world and kernel
On 2012/3/3 4:24, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
A truss snippet from running with an older-than-r232144 kernel:
clock_gettime(4,{29653.159790037 }) = 0 (0x0)
write(12,\M-z,1) = 1 (0x1)
clock_gettime(4,{29653.160165225 }) = 0 (0x0)
gettimeofday({1330716922.220648
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:26:08 -0500, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
fstat only shows the inode number of the file, e.g. [...]
Oops. I should have paid more attention (or installed sysutils/lsof)
before piping around output of an unfamiliar tool...
I don't recall seeing in your
On 3/2/12 12:21 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:01:25 -0800
Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
I bet it is old enough :)
I'm on 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227950 and when Seamonkey
On 3/2/12 4:43 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/3/3 1:01, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Ok. So it's that exact commit?
david, what did you break? :)
Adrian
I am also running the seamonkey and can not reproduce the problem.
maybe he did hit the race window when I was committing the patches ?
can he
On 3/2/12 10:21 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/02/2012 03:44, K. Macy wrote:
not sure who wrote:
Correct. However, I'm not sure the analogy is flawed. I am, to some
degree, guilty of the same sin. I now run Ubuntu and have never had a
single problem keeping my package system up date, in stark
42 matches
Mail list logo
