Hi all,
once run growfs on a partition that had an UFS label, this label is
removed and it's no more possible to re-set it with tunefs.
Here is how to reproduce (tested on 8.3 and 9.0):
mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 10MB
gpart create -s mbr /dev/md0
gpart add -t freebsd -s 5MB /dev/md0
newfs -L
On 08/03/2012 22:20, George Neville-Neil wrote:
Howdy,
I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a patch
against HEAD
which I have now subjected to testing using tools/regression/fsx.
The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/head-fuse-1.diff
I would like
Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
this message days ago:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTA2NzM
I
On 09/03/2012 12:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
this message days ago:
On Friday 09 March 2012 00:54:19 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:43:42PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Last version is here:
https://code.google.com/p/google-summer-of-code-2011-freebsd/downloads/list
--HPS
___
TB --- 2012-03-09 14:59:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-09 14:59:04 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2012-03-09 14:59:04 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-09 14:59:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-09 14:59:04 -
On Mar 8, 2012, at 17:54 , Konstantin Belousov wrote:
I just took a very quick look, and the code has all usual bugs. E.g., the
filesystem is marked mpsafe, while insmntque() is performed before new
vnode is initialized.
The fuse was known to cause random kernel memory corruption, were the
On Thursday 08 March 2012 07:16 pm, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-07 05:51, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size
for boot2 is not enough to hold code generated by clang.
Reverting r232570 fixes it.
Please test the attached diff. Since it
On Mar 9, 2012, at 04:48 , Gustau Pérez wrote:
On 08/03/2012 22:20, George Neville-Neil wrote:
Howdy,
I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a
patch against HEAD
which I have now subjected to testing using tools/regression/fsx.
The patch is here:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:16:52 pm Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-07 05:51, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size for
boot2 is not enough to hold code generated by clang. Reverting r232570
fixes it.
Please test the attached diff. Since
I'm getting quite a few of these Rune-related errors during port
builds lately. I've tried following the advice from the list, but no
good, they still keep occurring. I even tried backing off to my last
known good buildworld/buildkernel (around Feb 23), and it still doesn't
help.
Also seeing
On 03/09/12 21:04, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I'm getting quite a few of these Rune-related errors during port
builds lately. I've tried following the advice from the list, but no
good, they still keep occurring. I even tried backing off to my last
known good buildworld/buildkernel (around
I might have missed the point but since a week now I can't build FreeBSD
10.0 CURRENT/amd64 with CLANG anymore.
Amongst other problems I was told that the code this momnet is incapable
to build properly with CLANG, but then several fixes where merged.
Building world ends up everytime at the
TB --- 2012-03-09 20:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-09 20:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-09 20:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-09 20:20:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-09 20:20:00 -
On 03/08/12 01:28, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:29:16 +0200, Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios wrote
Hi,
2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on
GNU/Linux, so I would assume it will be the same on FreeBSD with
webcamd and not worth the $30? (which also frees up
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:39:23 +0100
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 03/09/12 21:04, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I'm getting quite a few of these Rune-related errors during port
builds lately. I've tried following the advice from the list, but
no good, they still keep
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:38:22 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:39:23 +0100
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 03/09/12 21:04, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I'm getting quite a few of these Rune-related errors during port
builds
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:53:50 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
[snip]
Well, now, this is interesting. Just for curiosity's sake, I tried
building a new kernel with the fresh source tree I just fetched from
the svn repository, and it succeeded! Still can't build world,
though.
On 03/09/12 22:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:53:50 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
[snip]
Well, now, this is interesting. Just for curiosity's sake, I tried
building a new kernel with the fresh source tree I just fetched from
the svn repository, and
On 03/10/12 06:53, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:38:22 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:39:23 +0100
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 03/09/12 21:04, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I'm getting quite a few of these
20 matches
Mail list logo
