2012/3/11 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru:
On 11.03.2012 23:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
This is awesome!
Is it just read-only, or does it allow creation/destruction of LDM volumes?
It is read-only, but you can partially destroy LDM metadata on given disk.
LDM keeps information about all
On 12.03.2012 11:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
partitions. Actually, it is possible make better LDM support in conjunction
with GEOM_RAID, but i think we don't need it :)
Hah, I wouldn't say no to being able to modify (correctly) LDM metadat.a
i'd also love to see say, read/write Linux LVM
On 3/12/12, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/3/11 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru:
On 11.03.2012 23:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
This is awesome!
Is it just read-only, or does it allow creation/destruction of LDM
volumes?
It is read-only, but you can partially destroy LDM
On 11. Mar 2012, at 23:55 , Michael Butler wrote:
I noted some thing odd when executing the following ..
/home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list
sudo: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:2644: Failed assertion:
(run-regs_mask[elm] (1U bit)) == 0
Abort
Adding '-t' as a
On 11/03/2012 10:35, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi, All
i wrote GEOM_PART_LDM class. It provides basic support of Logical Disk Manager
partitioning scheme [1]. Since LDM metadata is not documented i used several
articles found in the web and linux implementation as reference [2].
Seems ok,
On 2012-03-12 00:55, Michael Butler wrote:
I noted some thing odd when executing the following ..
/home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list
sudo: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:2644: Failed assertion:
(run-regs_mask[elm] (1U bit)) == 0
Abort
Adding '-t' as a parameter
Dear all,
I'm currently having some trouble with the dynamic loader.
I have the libc compilled with MALLOC_DEBUG flag to detect double free.
When i run this piece of code (attached file) thought GDB, i have this
assertion :
Assertion failed: ((run-regs_mask[elm] (1U bit)) == 0), function
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote:
Dear all,
I'm currently having some trouble with the dynamic loader.
I have the libc compilled with MALLOC_DEBUG flag to detect double free.
When i run this piece of code (attached file) thought GDB, i have this
assertion
Hi.
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened
simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that
at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and SandyBridge Core
i7s) with enabled Intel Turbo Boost in BIOS it is not use it by default,
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi.
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've
found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and
SandyBridge
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've
found that at least two of my desktop systems
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
opened simple access to the Intel
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander
On 03/12/12 22:22, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened
simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that
at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and SandyBridge Core
i7s) with
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:38:16 +0200
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 22:22, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org пишет:
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander
On 03/12/12 22:45, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened
simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that
at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 -
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-12 16:20:00 -
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, matt sendtom...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/08/12 01:28, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:29:16 +0200, Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios wrote
Hi,
2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on
GNU/Linux, so I would assume it will be the same
22 matches
Mail list logo