Andreas Tobler andre...@freebsd.org schrieb:
On 28.03.12 00:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
also
Hello.
Is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT capable/ready to be run as a IPv6-only system? I
read some time ago that to be run still some portions of the IPv4-code
is needed to be compiled into the system/kernel.
Regards,
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
Is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT capable/ready to be run as a IPv6-only system? I
read some time ago that to be run still some portions of the IPv4-code
is needed to be compiled into the system/kernel.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:32:49PM +0200, Edward Tomasz Napiera?a wrote:
Wiadomo?? napisana przez Alexander Pyhalov w dniu 26 lip 2011, o godz. 15:32:
Hello.
I see in rctl man page, that I can limit cpu time in milliseconds, e.g.,
for jail. But I can't deny allocation of the resource
(...snip...)
Disable everything you can to reduce the attachable devices and see
if it will still boot. This will help identify which device if any
is causing the hang
Yes, I considered this. But even after having disabled everything
that's possible in the bios, the boot issue
On 27/03/2012 23:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Fixed the issue on my X61s, thanks :)
Sevan
___
TB --- 2012-03-28 13:21:16 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-28 13:21:16 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-03-28 13:21:16 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 13:21:59 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 13:21:59 -
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 09:39 pm, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 03/27/12 17:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached
patch. Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This
On Monday, May 09, 2011 2:24:37 pm David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:29:55 David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 18:28:06 John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:07:06 pm David Naylor wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Motin wrote:
David
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
[...]
and
10 remove that block :
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/workaround-to-boot-p5ne.diff
Yeah, the problem is that NVIDIA chipsets seem to have
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
[...]
and
10 remove that block :
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:24:13 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
[...]
and
10 remove
TB --- 2012-03-28 21:26:38 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-28 21:26:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-03-28 21:26:38 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 21:27:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 21:27:19 -
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:41:35PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:24:13 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at
On 03/28/12 06:40, Mark wrote:
(...snip...)
Disable everything you can to reduce the attachable devices and see
if it will still boot. This will help identify which device if any
is causing the hang
Yes, I considered this. But even after having disabled everything
that's possible in the
TB --- 2012-03-28 22:16:47 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-28 22:16:47 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2012-03-28 22:16:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 22:16:47 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 22:16:47 -
Am 03/28/12 13:33, schrieb Andrey Fesenko:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
Is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT capable/ready to be run as a IPv6-only system? I
read some time ago that to be run still some portions of the IPv4-code
is needed
TB --- 2012-03-28 23:09:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-28 23:09:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2012-03-28 23:09:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 23:09:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-28 23:09:01 -
18 matches
Mail list logo
