On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:45:25AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 04/04/12 04:29, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:21:11PM +0300, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
I use one port from the Ports Collection, that works with
On 04/05/12 01:46, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:45:25AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 04/04/12 04:29, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
The SVN commit
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=228756
will
On (04/04/2012 06:38), David Wolfskill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:50:35PM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
...
tmpfs-32bit-size_max.patch.txt should fix the problem. I don't have i386
installations to test it myself.
Do you run PAE kernel? Could you try filling up /tmp at least to
On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:37:35 John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 2:24:37 pm David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:29:55 David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 18:28:06 John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:07:06 pm David Naylor wrote:
On
TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 09:34:41 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 09:34:41 -
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:28:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:28:15 -
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:43:04AM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
...
Summary: as before, I believe that the patch didn't hurt anything, but
it also doesn't restrict the usable size of /tmp to the specified size
(from /etc/fstab):
I've checked on i386 and patch worked as expected, but it
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:29:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 06:29:19 -
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:56:45 am Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch
This is the first update to FreeBSD's jemalloc in over two years, and the
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 4:40:32 am David Naylor wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:37:35 John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 2:24:37 pm David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:29:55 David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 18:28:06 John Baldwin wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch
* Are the symbol versioning specifications right, and are the
Hi folks,
Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the
`hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking
down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a
scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers
groups and let a variable
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...]
2012/2/17 Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org:
On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander
TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 17:29:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-04-05 17:29:32 -
On 05.04.2012 21:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...]
2012/2/17 Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org:
On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff
FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent
tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm
going to assume that this was a transient error unless something else
comes up.
Doug
On 4/5/2012 3:06 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2012-04-05
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:55:48AM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent
tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm
going to assume that this was a transient error unless something else
comes up.
On 4/5/2012 12:22 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent
tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm
going to assume that this was a
On 4/5/2012 3:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for confirming. I also forgot to mention that all the related
changes were made in the same commit, so I'm not sure what the issue
could have been.
The logs / progress are visible at http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/
It looks like pc98 i386 built
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:28, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
But as always, if someone comes up with an actual problem related to the
[BIND] update I'm happy to address it.
The MIPS tinderbox build is currently broken. This is related to a
binutils bug for which a workaround was
On 4/5/2012 12:39 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
You have not broken the MIPS tinderbox. It has been broken for a
couple of weeks now, and is a known problem, and hopefully will be
fixed soon.
*phew* Thanks for letting me know. :)
Doug
___
On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch
* Are the symbol
Quoting John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net:
On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:21 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
I updated a machine yesterday from 9-STABLE to 10-CURRENT
(r233631). Everything went smoothly with the update itself, but I
ran in to an issue with Python when rebuilding all of my installed
ports.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:39:00 -0700
Juli Mallett jmall...@freebsd.org mentioned:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:28, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
But as always, if someone comes up with an actual problem related to the
[BIND] update I'm happy to address it.
The MIPS tinderbox build is
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:05 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:02:13PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/12/12 15:04, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:57:52PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/12/12 14:18, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at
On 06.04.2012 00:20, Jaroslav Suchanek wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:05 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:02:13PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/12/12 15:04, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:57:52PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/12/12 14:18, Yuri
On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:56:45 am Jason Evans wrote:
* Will the utrace feature be missed? I removed it some time ago, mainly
because traces are impossibly large for most real-world use cases.
I will only speak to this one. I do still
Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net writes:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Thanks for confirming. I also forgot to mention that all the related
changes were made in the same commit, so I'm not sure what the issue
could have been.
The logs / progress are visible at
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host
environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of CURRENT
compiled from r233913 sources.
There is nothing special about the tinderbox host environment, it's a
quad-core Phenom
Stanislav Sedov s...@freebsd.org writes:
What I still cannot understand is that why my workaround doesn't work
on tinderbox and for some people builds. It should disable linking
agains libasn1 for libkafs5 completely on mips which is the source of
the problem in libkafs5.
The complete build
2012/4/5 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host
environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of CURRENT
compiled from r233913 sources.
There is nothing special about the
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:31 -0700, Alex Keda wrote:
On 16.03.2012 19:39, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to start merging mfi(4) from projects/head_mfi into -current
next week. The mfi(4) driver is stable and I don't know of any issues
with it now. I fixed a few issues that I
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:35:06 -0700
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com mentioned:
2012/4/5 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host
environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
Forgot a key piece of info. My VM that this works on is i386, not
amd64. I assume that's a trigger?
Frankly, I have no idea...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
TB --- 2012-04-06 01:36:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-06 01:36:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
36 matches
Mail list logo
