Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume

2012-05-15 Thread Peter Jeremy
I wrote: Thank you for that. Since I was in the process of upgrading my netbook (Acer Aspire One AOA-110 - Atom N270), I rolled your RELENG_8 patch on top of r235229. Unfortunately, the result hasn't been a complete success. On 2012-May-13 22:53:28 +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-05-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-05-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-05-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-15 10:08:09 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-15 10:08:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-05-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-15 07:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: ACPI 'driver bug: Unable to set devclass'

2012-05-15 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following: On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have a suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.

Re: ACPI 'driver bug: Unable to set devclass'

2012-05-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/05/2012 17:34 John Baldwin said the following: On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following: On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have a suspicion

Re: updating from r231158 to 234465: mounting from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a failed with error 19

2012-05-15 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, May 07, 2012 5:25:02 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton

Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume

2012-05-15 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-05-15 03:30:02 -0400, Peter Jeremy wrote: I wrote: Thank you for that. Since I was in the process of upgrading my netbook (Acer Aspire One AOA-110 - Atom N270), I rolled your RELENG_8 patch on top of r235229. Unfortunately, the result

Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume

2012-05-15 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, First of all, thank you very much for your work! I wanted to do it for very long time but I had no time to actually implement it. :-) Welcome! I also wanted to do this for very long time but I had no time and test machines ;) Recently I got Core Duo (Thinkpad X60) and Core 2 Duo (X61)

sockstat jid patch

2012-05-15 Thread Andrew Thompson
Hi, Here is a quick patch to limit the sockstat output to a specific jail id, this is useful to verify which sockets a jail has open. A jid of 0 will show the host system. This will result in an extra syscall per socket when -j is set but I do not think warrants a process cache. Any

Re: sockstat jid patch

2012-05-15 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Wed, 16 May 2012 15:12:50 +1200 Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Here is a quick patch to limit the sockstat output to a specific jail id, this is useful to verify which sockets a jail has open. A jid of 0 will show the host system. This will result in an extra syscall